Comments on FiveThirtyEight: Politics Done Right: Reid Has Few Ways to Block Burris Appointment

酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店經紀, ...

2009-10-02T04:50:53.743-04:00

酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
菲
梵,

与本级人民政府统计机构统计调查取得的统计数据不一致的，再次同声传译提请全国人惠州翻译公司。大常委会...

2009-06-26T09:36:34.588-04:00

与本级人民政府统计机构统计调查取得的统计数据不一致的，再次同声传译提请全国人惠州翻译公司。大常委会商务口译审议的统计法修订草案明确规定：深圳翻译公司，国家广州翻译公司统计数据以同声传译设备租赁国家统计局公布的数据为准俄语翻译，
政府有关部门统计调查取得的统计数据，与本级人民政府统计机构统计调查取得的统计数据不一致的，县级深圳翻译以上地方深圳同声传译人民政府设立广州翻译公司独立的统计机构翻译公司，，乡、法语翻译
上海翻译公司镇人民政府设置统计工作岗位上海翻译公司
英语翻译，配备专职或者兼职同传设备
同声传译统计人员，深圳日语

翻译
同声传译设备租赁。。新疆租车，依法管理统计工作同声传译设备租赁，
法语翻译
同声传译同声传译，同声传译设备
珠海翻译公司，实施统计调查。深圳手机号码，
同声传译设备
表决器。会议设备租赁
广州翻译公司
汕头翻译公司，
无线导览
会议设备租赁统计人员应当具备与其从事的统计工作相适应的专业知识和业务能力。

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 ...

2009-04-16T01:46:00.000-04:00

豆豆聊天室 aio交友愛情館 2008真情寫真 2009真情寫真 aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇 ...

2009-03-28T05:21:00.000-04:00

豆豆聊天室 aio交友愛情館 2008真情寫真 2009真情寫真 aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇大眾論壇 plus論壇 080視訊聊天室情色視訊交友90739 美女交友-成人聊天室色情小說做愛成人圖片區豆豆色情聊天室 080豆豆聊天室小辣妹影音交友網台中情人聊天室桃園星願聊天室高雄網友聊天室新中台灣聊天室中部網友聊天室嘉義之光聊天室基隆海岸聊天室中壢網友聊天室南台灣聊天室南部聊坊聊天室台南不夜城聊天室南部網友聊天室屏東網友聊天室台南網友聊天室屏東聊坊聊天室雲林網友聊天室大學生BBS聊天室網路學院聊天室屏東夜語聊天室孤男寡女聊天室一網情深聊天室心靈饗宴聊天室流星花園聊天室食色男女色情聊天室真愛宣言交友聊天室情人皇朝聊天室上班族成人聊天室上班族f1影音視訊聊天室哈雷視訊聊天室 080影音視訊聊天室 38不夜城聊天室援交聊天室080 080哈啦聊天室台北已婚聊天室已婚廣場聊天室夢幻家族聊天室摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室 520情色聊天室 QQ成人交友聊天室免費視訊網愛聊天室愛情公寓免費聊天室拉子性愛聊天室柔情網友聊天室哈啦影音交友網哈啦影音視訊聊天室櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集 123上班族聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族 080上班族聊天室 6k聊天室粉紅豆豆聊天室 080豆豆聊天網新豆豆聊天室 080聊天室免費音樂試聽流行音樂試聽免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看色情貼影片免費a長片本土成人貼圖站大台灣情色網台灣男人幫論壇 A圖網嘟嘟成人電影網火辣春夢貼圖網情色貼圖俱樂部台灣成人電影絲襪美腿樂園 18美女貼圖區柔情聊天網 707網愛聊天室聯盟台北69色情貼圖區 38女孩情色網台灣映像館波波成人情色網站美女成人貼圖區無碼貼圖力量色妹妹性愛貼圖區日本女優貼圖網日本美少女貼圖區亞洲風暴情色貼圖網哈啦聊天室美少女自拍貼圖辣妹成人情色網台北女孩情色網辣手貼圖情色網 AV無碼女優影片男女情色寫真貼圖 a片天使俱樂部萍水相逢遊戲區平水相逢遊戲區免費視訊交友90739 免費視訊聊天辣妹視訊 - 影音聊天網 080視訊聊天室日本美女肛交美女工廠貼圖區百分百貼圖區亞洲成人電影情色網台灣本土自拍貼圖網麻辣貼圖情色網好色客成人圖片貼圖區 711成人AV貼圖區台灣美女貼圖區筱萱成人論壇咪咪情色貼圖區 momokoko同學會視訊 kk272視訊情色文學小站成人情色貼圖區嘟嘟成人網嘟嘟情人色網 - 貼圖區免費色情a片下載台灣情色論壇成人影片分享免費視訊聊天區微風成人論壇 kiss文學區 taiwankiss文學區

希望大家都會非常非常幸福~「朵朵小語‧優美的眷戀在這個世界上，最重要的一件事，就是好好愛自己。好好愛...

2009-03-07T04:01:00.000-05:00

希望大家都會非常非常幸福~「朵朵小語‧優美的眷戀在這個世界上，最重要的一件事，就是好好愛自己。好好愛自己，你的眼睛才能看見天空的美麗，耳朵才能聽見山水的清音。好好愛自己，你才能體會所有美好的東西，所有的文字與音符才能像清泉一樣注入你的心靈。好好愛自己，你才有愛人的能力，也才有讓別人愛上你的魅力。而愛自己的第一步，就是切斷讓自己覺得黏膩的過去，以無沾無滯的輕快心情，大步走向前去。愛自己的第二步，則是隨時保持孩子般的好奇，願意接受未知的指引；也隨時可以拋卻不再需要的行囊，一路雲淡風輕。親愛的，你是天地之間獨一無二的旅人，在陽光與月光的交替之中瀟灑獨行。

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,...

2009-01-16T04:52:00.000-05:00

DCM-The IL Congress can impeach before any court f...

2009-01-01T09:19:00.000-05:00

DCM-

The IL Congress can impeach before any court finding, or even trial. They do have to base it on something though, and will need their own fact finding in order to do that.

It won't take months, expect a vote in late January or early February.

MIGHTY MOUSELOL - what are the grounds for actuall...

2009-01-01T00:29:00.000-05:00

MIGHTY MOUSE

LOL - what are the grounds for actually impeaching Blago at this time ???

that he is an embarrassment ?

that he has been 'accused' of talking like a drunken sailor about maybe committing a crime at some point in the future ?

do not forget, he has not even been indicted YET - let alone found guilty of any crime by a judge or jury so he must be given the presumption of 'innocence' no matter how crass or trivial that might seem

Fitz seems not to be in any rush to indict Blago - in fact, didn't he just get a 90 day extention to even file an indictment ?

then comes a long pre-trial period, then a lengthy trial unless he plea bargains...

what, we could easily be talking 1-2 YEARS before Blago has enough of a legal record to actually justify a proven impeachable offense [as opposed to an accusation]

sorry, but once again, Ted Stevens IS still a SENATOR for a few more days - and he is a CONVICTED felon with multiple counts of graft while in OFFICE & there was never any move to even try to remove him because he claimed he was entitled to his full appeal process

Blago, even if found guilty of some charge [not likely the offer to sell the senate seat - but perhaps other charges], might also be entitled to his appeal or his term might end first since it is looking less likely that he will step down anytime soon and why should he give up his only leverage [even though Spitzer did]

IL may want to impeach him, but legal basis for it at this moment is tenuous at best

the Clinton impeachment process took much, much longer than you claim if you start the clock from when it was proposed & ran it until the actual senate vote that failed to confirm the house articles of impeachment

besides, that might be why Blago made the Burris appointment - he fulfilled his duty as the chief executive & did not fail to do his job as required [in fact, that might have been an impeachable offense for Blago - if he neglected his duties as governor & failed to make the required nomination]. Perhaps that was a 'trap' that the IL AG & legislature was trying to pin Blago into ???

Blago can drag out this entire affair pretty much as long as he wants to dare the US attorney to pursue him [will Fitzgerald even remain after Obama is POTUS ?]

besides, if it looks like Fitz has political aspirations [which the blogs are saying he does] then this whole affair might smack of opportunism by Fitz to try to game the IL political system for his own personal advantage & maybe even an 'open' senate seat as the GOPer candidate...

watch, that rumor has started growing online already, and IF indicted you can bet that Blago's legal team will smear Fitz with it which could stink it allup & create reasonable doubt or justify an entrapment defense...

DCM in FL said... what makes some posters think th...

2008-12-31T21:27:00.000-05:00

DCM in FL said...
what makes some posters think that an impeachment process for Blago would only take a few months ???

The fact that the impeachment and trial of Bill Clinton took a combined total of 61 days. The Illinois House started impeachment proceedings on Dec. 15. Gov. Eff-word will be gone around the middle of February, hopefully by the 12th, Lincoln's birthday.

Melissa-"Let’s just pretend to have it your way an...

2008-12-31T10:59:00.000-05:00

Melissa-

"Let’s just pretend to have it your way and the judges interpret the constitution literally."

What I said was "It is possible to believe that a document really does mean something constant, taking context into account, and that only one interpretation is correct and that past interpretations may have been wrong without believing in a literal interpretation." I spent the first two paragraphs of my post trying to say I don't read the constitution (or the bible) literally and that criticisms such as your entire last paragraph don't apply to my argument. Instead, I see them as having real meaning from when they were made, and not as being hollow shells to use when we want the benefit of authority and tradition but still feel like doing things our modern way.

I am too young and do not remember or know all of the specifics of the cases you cited. But, in general, my argument is that it takes more than a good, just policy outcome to make a good ruling. If what you said is true about Reynolds vs. USA, then the first amendment, from context, really, and always, meant and will mean polygamy is not protected as being part of free exercise of religion. It will take a regime of strict interpretation to protect that if the ruling segment of society changes its mind on polygamy's worth.

I personally believe that polygamy ought to be banned because of its effects on women and the founders did not protect it. But if the constitution said "polygamy shall be protected" I would have no other recourse then telling my congressman to amend the constitution, and would not presume to pressure a judge into ruling a constitutional clause away. If people did that, and succeeded, then the constitution would cease to regulate the government.

On Brown v. Board, I am not hung up on the constitution's use of the word school or not. Many areas are open to interpretation, (though not all). The policy outcome of segregated schools is terrible, but I don't know enough to say if it was illegal. It seems to me that it defies the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment. Same with Loving v. Virginia. But regardless, in this country education for blacks is still bad despite the ruling. It's pretty bad for everyone in public school actually. That doesn't make the current situation automatically unconstitutional. It certainly leaves the victory for justice in Brown sadly hollow. Perhaps the courts are not the most effective tool to use to change society when they are perceived as being biased (whether they are or not).

If you further popularize the idea that whatever you can get away with due to your high placed judicial position is ipso facto constitutional, that ideology will be used against you and even spread to non judicial branches. (Though I hear the pay is not very good for a prophet who predicts the past, I thought I'd throw that in. It applies to the future, too.)

I think I'm with just_looking. The other John who...

2008-12-31T10:35:00.000-05:00

I think I'm with just_looking. The other John who works for the Senate and others above convince me that the Senate can exclude him on the grounds that his appointment is an "election" and that they have the right to judge that.

That being said, the rules committee would need to actually find some evidence of corruption in Burris's appointment to actually vacate the seat, I think. But that's a political judgment, not a legal one.

For my fellow members of the bar,I discovered earl...

2008-12-31T10:33:00.000-05:00

For my fellow members of the bar,

I discovered early in my career that the overt act doesn't need to be a whole lot in most conspiracy settings. In the intervening years, the push for early (some would say premature) prosecutions of potential terrorists has weakened it further - it really doesn't have to be much of anything. Talk about blowing something up, and take a picture of a logical target to be blown up - that's been enough for juries and judges in the last few years.

Here, the complaint lays out Blago and Harris (among other things) speculating that the SEIU would be a good conduit for getting a trade off for appointing Obama. Blago delusionally also thought appointing Jarrett would be worth a Cabinet post (HHS, which if you knew Illinois record on Medicaid and Medicare would make you laugh). At the very least, we have independent confirmation from Jarrett that SEIU's president was approached by a Blago rep about sounding out her interest, and the idea that Blago thought he was in line for a cabinet post. The fact Jarrett didn't want the appointment and both Jarrett and the SEIU rep thought the HHS idea was laughable doesn't change the fact Blago/Harris approaching the SEIU rep was in furtherance of their (delusional) plan. The overt act doesn't have to be improper on its own, after all.

At first I thought Nate was correct. But having r...

2008-12-31T09:30:00.000-05:00

At first I thought Nate was correct. But having read the thread, there is a good argument that the Senate can judge the appointment in the same manner it judges an election. However, is the Senate required to make a factual case that the appointment was illegally obtained? Is it enough to argue that Blago is a bad guy?

The affect of Proposition 8 on exisiting marriages...

2008-12-31T09:14:00.000-05:00

The affect of Proposition 8 on exisiting marriages will be decided by the California Supreme court in the same case that it judges the constitutionality of Proposition 8.

Brown's brief argues that Proposition 8 is an amendment (not a revision), but that an amendment which abrogates fundamental rights is unconstitutional. That's weird because how can an amendment itself be unconstitutional based on its content (as opposed to the process used to enact it)?

Brown maybe on shaky ground as to his duties when he filed the brief against Proposition 8. I thought he was supposed to argue for it unless he is unable to find any reasonable argument in support of it. Certainly, it is reasonable that an amendment cannot be found constituional based on its content.

Deciding whether the House had the power to exclud...

2008-12-31T09:10:00.000-05:00

Deciding whether the House had the power to exclude Adam Clayton Powell by a simple majority vote Chief Justice Warren wrote “Further, analysis of the ‘textual commitment’ under Art. I, 5 has demonstrated that in judging the qualifications of its members Congress is limited to the standing qualifications prescribed in the Constitution.” (Powell v. McCormack, 395 US 486,550; available at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=395&invol=486) The standing qualifications are age, citizenship, and residency. The Court voted 7-1 on this case. Only Justice Stewart dissented, and that was on the grounds that the case had been made moot by the expiration of the 90th Congress which had excluded Powell.

Burriss’s appointment is certainly tarnished by the Blagojevich mess. However, the appointment conforms to Illinois law and the 17th amendment vacancy clause which does not give the Illinois Secretary of State the power to veto the appointment. Burris, like Powell, meets all the standing qualifications. There are no grounds to exclude Burriss.

No one had demonstrated that Burriss himself has broken any laws. How much would the ranks of Congress be thinned if it excluded every member chosen in an election tainted by someone else’s fraud or graft? If Burriss is legally at fault, that is the subject of a trial-like expulsion process after Burriss is seated. In a footnote to Powell CJ Warren noted “A further distinction between expulsion and exclusion inheres in the fact that a member whose expulsion is contemplated may as a matter of right address the House and participate fully in debate while a member-elect apparently does not have a similar right.” (Senate Rule 23 denies Burriss a right to appear on the Senate floor until he is sworn in.)

Clearly, the people of Illinois are the surest losers in this mess. The Democrats in the state legislature should be ashamed of themselves for not having passed a bill calling for a quick special election out of concern that a Republican might capture the seat. All they are doing is writing a scenario for a Republican to win the seat in 2010.

@ melissaI really don’t think that southern states...

2008-12-31T06:02:00.000-05:00

@ melissa

I really don’t think that southern states would had passed a law legalizing interracial marriages but if an activist judge interpret one of the southern state’s interracial marriage law as unconstitutional and couples interracially married but the people of that southern state successfully passed an amendment criminalizing interracial marriage afterward, should all interracial couples go to jail?

No.It couldn't happen because it would be unconstitutional under the "ex post facto" provision of the U.S. Constitution.This provision bans retroactive criminal laws.

@ melissaNo,you have it all wrong.I am in favor of...

2008-12-31T05:46:00.000-05:00

@ melissa

No,you have it all wrong.

I am in favor of same-sex marriage and against everything in Calafornia's Proposition Eight.Of course I agree with the Loving decision.(Is there anybody except the most rabid racists who doesn't.)

So you know me,,I am a straight male ultra-liberal atheist.

Welcome.

In other news, Blague's General Counsel has resign...

2008-12-31T04:54:00.000-05:00

In other news, Blague's General Counsel has resigned:

http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/1355168,blagojevich-general-counsel-resign-123008.article

@OpusBased on your choice of comments, should I co...

2008-12-31T04:43:00.000-05:00

@Opus

Based on your choice of comments, should I conclude that you disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Virginia state law in regards to interracial marriages? After all, the state and many southern states had passed laws that criminalized interracial marriages.

I really don’t think that southern states would had passed a law legalizing interracial marriages but if an activist judge interpret one of the southern state’s interracial marriage law as unconstitutional and couples interracially married but the people of that southern state successfully passed an amendment criminalizing interracial marriage afterward, should all interracial couples go to jail?

@BrianAm I right in assuming that you are a conser...

2008-12-31T04:30:00.000-05:00

@Brian

Am I right in assuming that you are a conservative who wants to have judges that interpret the constitution literally and often rant against the liberal activist judges? Anyways, I have been hearing this kind of stuff ever since brown vs. broad of education of Topeka. Let’s just pretend to have it your way and the judges interpret the constitution literally.

Since there is nothing in the constitution that talk about a state decision to promote segregation be it de facto or de juries, and the activist judges did not liberally interpret the 14th amendment, than that means that Kansas could have continue their segregation policy for decades just because the word school was not literally written into the constitution. Now, tell me that you would have supported segregation sponsor by the state because the constitution did not bestow the power to the federal government to intervene in their state policies.

Now, what about interracial marriages, such as loving vs. Virginia? Should the SC voted in favor of the state of Virginia instead of the Loving, because there was nothing written literally into the constitution about interracial marriages? Should the Lovings be held as criminals under Virginia state law for interracially marrying because the constitution never literally wrote the word marriage into it and marriage is more of a state issue than a federal one? Should the federal government be powerless from intervening in southern states that criminalized interracial marriages based on a literal interpretation of the constitution?

Now in the case of Reynolds vs. USA, Reynolds argue that it was his first amendment right to practice polygamy since it must had fall under freedom of religion. The judges disagree with him and use Thomas Jefferson’s letters to said that the federal government can intervene in actions committed by an individual regardless of their religious beliefs if it harmful to society. If a judge were to literally interpret the constitution, which said in the first amendment that congress cannot prohibit the free exercise of religion, than Mormons can practice polygamy, Indians can burn themselves among their husband burn body, and cults can promote human sacrifices. After all, in the literal sense, they fall under the free exercise of religion and Thomas Jefferson’s letters is relevant to the case.

And since we are on the subject of literal interpretation, what about the bible? In the bible, it said that Joshua made the sun stood still in the sky. So according to a literalist, if the sun did stand still in the sky, than that must mean that the sun moves around the earth. Now, we all know that the sun does not move at all but it is the earth that moves around the sun. If the sun is the center of the solar system and if the earth moves around it, then the earth should force all those that inherited it to go spinning at 600 miles an hour. That did not happen. So this must means that the bible should not be read as a literal document just as the constitution cannot always be read in a far right wing literal sense.

personally, i think the term "elections" of senato...

2008-12-31T03:40:00.000-05:00

personally, i think the term "elections" of senator can be more broadly interpreted to include a governor's appointment... election as choice, that is.

Political paranoia!wv; brissi Has elements of the...

2008-12-31T03:08:00.000-05:00

Political paranoia!

wv; brissi Has elements of the Jewish circumcision ceremony.

Even lacking constitutional authority, it would be...

2008-12-31T03:00:00.000-05:00

Even lacking constitutional authority, it would be idiocy not to attempt to exclude Burris. In terms of electoral politics, people understand that something was forced by the court (they'll rail about "activist judges" and whatnot, but they would not blame the congressional democrats, which is what's important here). But they won't understand that the vote to seat Burris was based solely on whether he met the basic legal criteria. That's what will hurt in attack ads in 2010.

SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman ...

2008-12-31T02:45:00.000-05:00

SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.

This seems to be ex post facto and covers all same sex marriages regardless of when or where they occurred.,no?

SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman ...

2008-12-31T02:38:00.000-05:00

SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.

Comments on FiveThirtyEight: Politics Done Right: Reid Has Few Ways to Block Burris Appointment

酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店經紀, ...

与本级人民政府统计机构统计调查取得的统计数据不一致的， 再次同声传译提请全国人惠州翻译公司。大常委会...

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇 ...

豆豆聊天室 aio交友愛情館 2008真情寫真 2009真情寫真 aa片免費看 捷克論壇 微風論壇 ...

希望大家都會非常非常幸福~「朵朵小語‧優美的眷戀在這個世界上，最重要的一件事，就是好好愛自己。好好愛...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,...

DCM-The IL Congress can impeach before any court f...

MIGHTY MOUSELOL - what are the grounds for actuall...

DCM in FL said... what makes some posters think th...

Melissa-"Let’s just pretend to have it your way an...

I think I'm with just_looking. The other John who...

For my fellow members of the bar,I discovered earl...

At first I thought Nate was correct. But having r...

The affect of Proposition 8 on exisiting marriages...

Deciding whether the House had the power to exclud...

@ melissaI really don’t think that southern states...

@ melissaNo,you have it all wrong.I am in favor of...

In other news, Blague's General Counsel has resign...

@OpusBased on your choice of comments, should I co...

@BrianAm I right in assuming that you are a conser...

personally, i think the term "elections" of senato...

Political paranoia!wv; brissi Has elements of the...

Even lacking constitutional authority, it would be...

SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman ...

SEC. 7.5. Only marriage between a man and a woman ...

与本级人民政府统计机构统计调查取得的统计数据不一致的，再次同声传译提请全国人惠州翻译公司。大常委会...

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 ...

豆豆聊天室 aio交友愛情館 2008真情寫真 2009真情寫真 aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇 ...