Comments on FiveThirtyEight: Politics Done Right: Most Americans Oppose Seating Burris, But Reid's O...

酒店經紀人, 菲梵酒店經紀, 酒店經紀, 禮服酒店上班, 酒店小姐兼職, 便服酒店經紀, ...

2009-10-09T08:16:03.602-04:00

酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
菲
梵,

自慰,女生自慰,美女,高潮,失戀,性高潮,女性高潮,G點,自慰,性,性感,性感內衣,內衣,性感內衣,...

2009-08-02T01:22:59.231-04:00

自慰,女生自慰,美女,高潮,失戀,性高潮,女性高潮,G點,自慰,性,性感,性感內衣,內衣,性感內衣,性感睡衣,情趣內衣,比基尼內衣,人妻少婦性感睡衣,
失戀,性愛,性感,情慾,調情,挑逗,慾望,情人節禮物,自慰器,

豆豆聊天室 aio交友愛情館 2008真情寫真 2009真情寫真 aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇 ...

2009-03-28T05:05:00.000-04:00

豆豆聊天室 aio交友愛情館 2008真情寫真 2009真情寫真 aa片免費看捷克論壇微風論壇大眾論壇 plus論壇 080視訊聊天室情色視訊交友90739 美女交友-成人聊天室色情小說做愛成人圖片區豆豆色情聊天室 080豆豆聊天室小辣妹影音交友網台中情人聊天室桃園星願聊天室高雄網友聊天室新中台灣聊天室中部網友聊天室嘉義之光聊天室基隆海岸聊天室中壢網友聊天室南台灣聊天室南部聊坊聊天室台南不夜城聊天室南部網友聊天室屏東網友聊天室台南網友聊天室屏東聊坊聊天室雲林網友聊天室大學生BBS聊天室網路學院聊天室屏東夜語聊天室孤男寡女聊天室一網情深聊天室心靈饗宴聊天室流星花園聊天室食色男女色情聊天室真愛宣言交友聊天室情人皇朝聊天室上班族成人聊天室上班族f1影音視訊聊天室哈雷視訊聊天室 080影音視訊聊天室 38不夜城聊天室援交聊天室080 080哈啦聊天室台北已婚聊天室已婚廣場聊天室夢幻家族聊天室摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室 520情色聊天室 QQ成人交友聊天室免費視訊網愛聊天室愛情公寓免費聊天室拉子性愛聊天室柔情網友聊天室哈啦影音交友網哈啦影音視訊聊天室櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集 123上班族聊天室尋夢園上班族聊天室成人聊天室上班族 080上班族聊天室 6k聊天室粉紅豆豆聊天室 080豆豆聊天網新豆豆聊天室 080聊天室免費音樂試聽流行音樂試聽免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看色情貼影片免費a長片本土成人貼圖站大台灣情色網台灣男人幫論壇 A圖網嘟嘟成人電影網火辣春夢貼圖網情色貼圖俱樂部台灣成人電影絲襪美腿樂園 18美女貼圖區柔情聊天網 707網愛聊天室聯盟台北69色情貼圖區 38女孩情色網台灣映像館波波成人情色網站美女成人貼圖區無碼貼圖力量色妹妹性愛貼圖區日本女優貼圖網日本美少女貼圖區亞洲風暴情色貼圖網哈啦聊天室美少女自拍貼圖辣妹成人情色網台北女孩情色網辣手貼圖情色網 AV無碼女優影片男女情色寫真貼圖 a片天使俱樂部萍水相逢遊戲區平水相逢遊戲區免費視訊交友90739 免費視訊聊天辣妹視訊 - 影音聊天網 080視訊聊天室日本美女肛交美女工廠貼圖區百分百貼圖區亞洲成人電影情色網台灣本土自拍貼圖網麻辣貼圖情色網好色客成人圖片貼圖區 711成人AV貼圖區台灣美女貼圖區筱萱成人論壇咪咪情色貼圖區 momokoko同學會視訊 kk272視訊情色文學小站成人情色貼圖區嘟嘟成人網嘟嘟情人色網 - 貼圖區免費色情a片下載台灣情色論壇成人影片分享免費視訊聊天區微風成人論壇 kiss文學區 taiwankiss文學區

成人網站,成人影片,av女優,h漫,成人網站,成人電影,a片,色情,成人影片,色情,成人電影,色情,...

2009-03-02T00:35:00.000-05:00

成人網站,成人影片,av女優,h漫,成人網站,成人電影,a片,色情,成人影片,色情,成人電影,色情,h漫,成人影片,成人電影,免費A片,色情,成人電影,成人影片,免費A片,色情,成人網站,免費A片,成人網站,色情,a片,成人影片,情色,免費A片,微風成人,情色,成人影片,微風成人,av女優

成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,色情網站,色情網站,色情網站,色情網站,av女優,av女優,av女優,av女優,色情,色情,色情,色情,h漫,h漫,h漫,h漫,sex,sex,sex,sex,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人電影,成人電影,成人電影,成人電影,av女優,a片,a片,a片,a片,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,av女優,av女優

av女優,av女優,色情,色情,色情,色情,h漫,h漫,h漫,h漫,sex,sex,sex,sex,情色,情色,情色,情色,a片,a片,a片,a片,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,av女優,av女優,av女優,av女優,色情,色情,色情

色情,h漫,h漫,h漫,h漫,sex,sex,sex,sex,情色,情色,情色,情色,辣妹視訊,辣妹視訊,辣妹視訊,辣妹視訊,080視訊聊天室,080視訊聊天室,080視訊聊天室,080視訊聊天室,美女交友,美女交友

美女交友,美女交友,情色視訊,情色視訊,情色視訊,情色視訊,哈啦聊天室,哈啦聊天室,哈啦聊天室,哈啦聊天室,ut聊天室,ut聊天室,ut聊天室,ut聊天室,聊天室,聊天室,聊天室

打卡鐘,情趣用品,吃到飽麻辣鍋,黃金回收,牙醫,跳蛋,指甲彩繪,植牙,影印機,賺錢,持久液,碎紙機,黃金,植牙,情趣用品,創業加盟,借錢,蒙古火鍋,當舖,情趣,賺錢,牙醫,鑽石回收,咖啡機,亞太電信,情趣用品,水晶指甲

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,...

2009-01-16T04:34:00.000-05:00

Why would a Secretary of State withhold his signat...

2009-01-12T18:05:00.000-05:00

Why would a Secretary of State withhold his signature? If the Senate rules are similar to those for admitting delegations to the Electoral College, it would be so that in event of a new governor making an appointment (after conviction of impeachment or an election), the new governor's choice would have the Secretary of State's signature, and thus would be assumed to be the official candidate. White has signed because Reid no longer wants to fight. The Illinois Supreme Court is correct to say that Illinois does not require a Secretary of State's signature, but in the circumstances the Senate's rules would have precedence, given the constitutional power to judge its elections and returns.

"Return" has an Eighteenth Century OED definition meaning "appointments", in exactly this context (an interrim appointment of an MP by an English County Sherrif is a "return"). It is clear that this power was given to the houses of Congress specifically to deal with corruption of electors or appointments, and there is nothing in the 17th amendment or the Adam Clayton Powell Jr. case that would block that power in this situation.

The Powell case dealt with an unquestioned election of a corrupt individual (who probably could have been expelled). It did not deal with alleged corruption in the appointment of a Senator by a Governor under the 17th amendment.

This is a little apples and oranges. I mean, the ...

2009-01-08T12:40:00.000-05:00

This is a little apples and oranges. I mean, the US won't be voting on the Senator from Illinois or any other state so the fact that they don't want him seated doesn't mean much. I would be interested (and I think Burris, Schakowsky, Hynes would be interested, too) in what the people of Illinois think about Burris as Senator.

In some ways this is the best result Reid can get, he "gets stuck" with another reliable democratic vote who he fought because of the corrupt process. And in 2010, a reform democrat will wipe Burris and the bad taste he and Blago leave away.

You can take Chuck Grassley off your list altogeth...

2009-01-07T18:22:00.000-05:00

You can take Chuck Grassley off your list altogether. His grandson told me he's running one more time then retiring. And Tom Vilsack will not challange him.

Democratic leaders are not going to seat Roland B...

2009-01-07T12:54:00.000-05:00

Democratic leaders are not going to seat Roland Burris immediately, but are waiting for the outcome of pending court cases and Burris’ testimony in the impeachment of Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich before signing off on his entry into the Senate.

All of this could unfold before the end of the week.

Well, the patented Democratic table pounding, followed by a complete surrender like the French army at Sedan is now fully accomplished! Hurrah!

Harry Reid is officially an expert at shooting himself in the foot over and over again.

Was there really a down-side to allowing Burris to litigate (and possibly win) in Federal court? NO!! The Senate refuses to seat him. He sues and wins. They shrug and seat him.

Republicans can't use this to tarnish Democrats because they can blame it on the courts. NO legal precedent is established that future scumbag Republicans can use to hard-ball refuse to seat some Democratic Senator (and they would if they were in the majority don't kid yourself).

Win-win-win. Sen. Dem's save face, Burris wins in Court and is seated, no bad precedent is created.

But, of course that would require Reid to actually be something other than a total doormat who folds at the first sign of pressure. He'd have to hold out for several months, not 4 days.

And that thought apparently left Reid and other key Democrats trembling in fear.

So, here's the actual plan:

One aide said one complicating factor to reaching a deal is the fact the Burris is scheduled to testify at Blagojevich's impeachment proceedings in Springfield on Thursday.

Seating him Wednesday before those hearings could be problematic if embarrassing details emerge, the aide said.

So, Reid is forced to not collapse and surrender until after the Thursday impeachment hearings, when presumably nothing too incriminating about Burris will come out, thus enabling Reid to announce that he's withdrawing his opposition to seating Burris in light of the "evidence" that Burris is not personally "tainted."

That's a rather puny fig-leaf to cover a rather large fatuous ass, but it's nothing new to Senate Dems. Inventing pathetic and transparent excuses for waiving the white flag is part of their well developed culture.

Burris told Rachel Maddow two nights ago that afte...

2009-01-07T11:39:00.000-05:00

Burris told Rachel Maddow two nights ago that after his Dec. 14 comments, his colleagues upbraided him for opting out of the 2010 election. He's changed course and is now willing to run in two years.

Dick Durbin is on MSNBC right now affirming Nate's original interpretation of the law and pointing out that since senator became an elected position 90 years ago, there has "never ... never" been an ejection for grounds cited by so-called constitutional experts on this blog.

Doesn't the poll reflect the view that Senate posi...

2009-01-07T07:12:00.000-05:00

Doesn't the poll reflect the view that Senate positions should be filled by a special election -- not that people believe Burris is tainted? Unfortunately, the poll does not present realistic options. Would you prefer to drive to work or twitch your nose and arrive there in seconds? The vast majority would chose the latter option.

The special election is off the table, because Democrats feared a GOP victory. But this contradicts their argument that Blagojevich is so tainted that he is incompetent to serve as governor. Of course, this is just a bunch of political posturing anyway. The real deal: Blagojevich was already unpopular. The allegations against him provide his opponents with a convenient way to oust him. The allegations give Senate Democrats control over who gets to sit in the Senate -- which they would otherwise lack. And, ironically, it allows THEM to "bargain" (more subtly) than Blagojevich with prospective "buyers." If anyone believes that the moral indignation that the Democrats express over this reflects an honest position, then God bless you. Better than that: consider their positions on the Clinton impeachment - especially Reid: A Harry Reid Flip-Flop? Comparing His Views on Bill Clinton and Rod Blagojevich

Michael Henning said...Hey, I think Burris already...

2009-01-07T04:17:00.000-05:00

Michael Henning said...
Hey, I think Burris already said he wouldn't run for reelection.

In 1994, how many Republicans stated that they would not stay longer than 6 years in the House (the most 'popular' of the term limit proposals then in vogue), or 2 terms as Senator?

And how many stayed past their promise?

In politics, many times expediency beats promises. Burris impresses me as someone who would break a promise if political reality or political appearance makes it expedient to break a promise.

Josh said...If Reid lets [Burris] be seated and ho...

2009-01-07T04:11:00.000-05:00

Josh said...
If Reid lets [Burris] be seated and holds a vote to expel him, it would be bipartisan

The reason it would NOT be bipartisan is given in the next words of your post, specifically:
it would remove the issue from the headlines

The Republicans WANT it to stay in the headlines. They can obstruct the Democrats and President Obama's programs and legislation without appearing to be that obstructionist. The longer Burris is in the headlines, the less work they have to do to generate discord within the Democratic ranks in the Senate, not to mention in House, and the Democratic parties in each of the states, especially in Illinois.

It takes a 2/3 vote to expel. With 55 Democratic votes plus Saunders is 56. Would LIEberman vote for or against? Maybe 57. Would Franken be seated by then? Who knows.

And that is presuming that all Democrats would vote to expel. That, in and of itself, is not guaranteed.

With 98 current Senators, that means 66 votes are needed for the 2/3 vote, leaving a minimum of 9, maybe 10 or more, Republicans voting to expel.

Which 9, 10 or more Republicans would vote to expel?

The names I come up with are:
1.
2.
3.

In other words, none.

I found a source:"Mr. Burris said at a news confer...

2009-01-07T03:58:00.000-05:00

I found a source:

"Mr. Burris said at a news conference Saturday that he only wants to serve the remaining two years of Obama’s term, and would not plan to run for re-election. ... He also said he was 'appalled' by the evidence that has been presented against Mr. Blagojevich, and that he supported Ms. Madigan in calling for the Illinois Supreme Court to remove the governor from office."
--December 14, From The New York Times Caucus Blog

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/another-applicant-for-obamas-senate-seat/

Hey, I think Burris already said he wouldn't run f...

2009-01-07T03:38:00.000-05:00

Hey, I think Burris already said he wouldn't run for reelection. Not Sure on this, I'll get back with another post once I have sources, but I think Burris had publicly offered himself to be seated in early december, saying that he wouldn't run again, and that he had no ties to Blagojevich, hence making him a good placeholder choice.

I was opposed to him being seated, but now that Fe...

2009-01-07T03:37:00.000-05:00

I was opposed to him being seated, but now that Feinstein is calling for him to be seated, I'm waffling.

Now I just think they should seat him, and then immediately hold a vote to expel him.

Everyone agrees the Senate can evict him once he is seated, and that would end the entire sordid affair.

I think that should be followed by the Illinois legislature taking the appointment power from Blago, and holding a special election.

Burris showing up, claiming "I am the Senator from Illinois, and getting turned away at the door isn't doing any favors.

If Reid lets him be seated and holds a vote to expel him, it would be bipartisan, it would remove the issue from the headlines, it would preempt Burris lawsuit and stop Blagojevich in his tracks.

We need to get the Blagojevich scandal back to local Chicago news for it to stop interfering with Obama's agenda.

Hi Mr. Silver. Love your site and hope to see more...

2009-01-07T01:55:00.000-05:00

Hi Mr. Silver. Love your site and hope to see more of you on The Rachel Maddow Show.

Betting other scandal/corrupt governors like Jim Gibbons are happy that Rod Blagojevich and Roland Burris are taking all national attention off on them.

Just curious, are there any polls about the Blagojevich-Burris scandal senate seat that focus just on Illinoisan voters rather the entire nation?

Nate, you've got to be kidding. There is no moral,...

2009-01-07T01:27:00.000-05:00

Nate, you've got to be kidding. There is no moral, ethical, legal, or even political rationale for a special election. It would be a big waste of money as well.

Bad ideas like this are the reason why Dems lose. Giving a freebie chance like this to republicans is crazy.

FREE ONLINE TV, MOVIES, MUSIC, VIRTUAL WORLDS, GOO...

2009-01-06T23:40:00.000-05:00

FREE ONLINE TV, MOVIES, MUSIC, VIRTUAL WORLDS, GOOD GAMES, AND FREE COLLEGE EDUCATIONS @ INTERNETSURFSHACK.COM

everyones fun little kabuki may blow up in our fac...

2009-01-06T23:35:00.000-05:00

everyones fun little kabuki may blow up in our face. Congrats. You have convinced the American public that burris shouldn't be seated and... Drumroll please...Harry Reid will be forced to seat him. More brilliancy from dems. I know why, but it still seems shortsighted to me.

Chris Cillizza takes the ambient political air tem...

2009-01-06T23:25:00.000-05:00

Chris Cillizza takes the ambient political air temperature at random points within five miles from the Capitol Dome and then reads it out as if it were immutable reality. It is simply nonsense that the U.S. Senate cannot successfully refuse to seat someone appointed by a governor who has been arrested by the FBI and accused by a U.S. Attorney of trying to extort bribes from prospective occupants of that Senate seat. Burris can sue if he wishes, but no federal court will go against the Senate in such a case. Hello? This is not just beanbag politics, friends -- it's the biggest political corruption case in decades. If Reid continues to resist Burris, Roland will be cooling his heels on the sidewalk until Blago is impeached and the Illinois lieutenant governor becomes acting governor and appoints a Senator who the state duly certifies.

Innocent bystander???? How is Burris an innocent ...

2009-01-06T22:48:00.000-05:00

Innocent bystander???? How is Burris an innocent bystander???

It was obvious from the first day of this scandal that anyone who took this nomination from Blagovitch was drinking from a poisoned chalice. Burris has to be a fool to think that he can accept the appointment without destroying his integrity.

The game is simple: keep Burris from the Senate until next Wednesday, and then watch the IL Legislature impeach Blagovitch and have the Lt. Gov. appoint someone else or start a special election. Blagovitch will never seat a senator, and the fact this is Obama's seat makes me ill!

There will be no special election in Illinois if f...

2009-01-06T22:40:00.000-05:00

There will be no special election in Illinois if for no other reason than Blago can sit on such a bill for 60 days before vetoing it.No Democrat in his/her right mind wants this poorly handled mess in the public eye for such a long period.

Burris will be seated shortly after the Writ of Mandamus is issued by the Illinois Supreme Court.

I think for a special election to happen Burris wo...

2009-01-06T21:30:00.000-05:00

I think for a special election to happen Burris would have to resign or be expelled, but I'm pretty certain the votes are there for that in the case of a special election law having been passed. The Democrats will support it because it is presumably at this point their plan and the Republicans will support it if they think Kirk has a shot at the seat.

"If the special election route is taken, even the ...

2009-01-06T21:16:00.000-05:00

"If the special election route is taken, even the worst case can't be that bad."

I don't see how a special election can happen. The current Gov of IL has appointed a person to fill the vacancy, despite what Sen Reid says, there is no longer a vacant IL senate seat. Even if the IL Lege tries to change the law & circumvent Blago's appointment, I don't see how a court sides on the side of the Lege, when Burris already has a valid appointment to the seat.