11.02.2009

15 Clarifying Questions For Close Elections

In 1994, baseball statistics godfather Bill James developed the Keltner List, a series of 15 gut-check questions that he suggests should be asked of players who are close calls to enter the sport's Hall of Fame. In thinking through my "call" of New Jersey, which I'll issue later today, I realized that there are a similar set of questions that I pose to myself in the event of elections that are too close to call from the polling alone. Some of these questions are subjective, while others will require a little bit of research, but for the most part they should lend themselves to relatively clear answers.

As you look at these questions, think about how you'd answer them for New Jersey, or NY-23, or perhaps Barack Obama's election last November, or George Bush's in 2004. The way that I prefer to do this is to assign up to 3 points to either of the candidates (but never both) for each question, depending on the magnitude of their advantage -- no points need be awarded if the factor is inapplicable or neither candidate has a discernible edge. When I do this for New Jersey, I come up with a relatively clear answer, as you'll see later.

1. Which candidate's supporters are more enthusiastic?

2. Which candidate is liable to have the better turnout operation?

3. Is one of the candidates a challenger to an incumbent, who might benefit from the 'incumbent rule'?

4. Do the demographics of the undecided vote, or the weakly-attached third-party vote, favor either of the candidates?

5. Which candidate got the more favorable coverage in the morning newspaper, or on the local evening news, on the Sunday before the election?

6. Which candidate has the better 'elevator pitch', particularly as encapsulated by the commercials they're running in the 48 hours before the election?

7. Which candidate has a headwind at their back from the national political environment, or has a message that squares better with the national political mood? Which candidate's party is liable to have the better Election Night nationwide?

8. Does either candidate begin with a built-in lead from early or absentee voting?

9. Which candidate, if any, stands to benefit from upballot or downballot races?

10. Which candidate stands to benefit from cellphone-only voters, or other voters who may not be represented in the polls?

11. Has the polling in previous elections in the state, or in similar elections in similar states, tended systematically to underestimate the performance of either candidate's party?

12. Which candidate drew more people to their campaign appearances in the state over the last two weeks of the campaign?

13. Which candidate got more contributions from voters within the state over the last six weeks of the campaign?

14. Which candidate has run the more positive, optimistic campaign, and will leave voters feeling better about themselves as they exit the polling place?

15. Which candidate's party controls the state's electoral and judicial apparatus, in the event of a recount or otherwise disputed election?

39 comments

mob said...

unless i am missing somthing, isnt this somewhat flawed in that the questions do not have the same value of importance?

i dont believe that voter turnout is equal to favorable coverage in the morning newspaper.
unless of course the paper had a story on one candidate hiking the appalachian trail with eva braun, while, spending the money you stole from mother theresa, on crystal meth, on mothers day

keith said...

The other problem is that a lot of these factors are endogenous to the polling data.

joel said...

All this polling is assuming a fairly weak democratic turnout. I fgure it this way Virginia a blowout hopefully deeds keeps it under 10.
NY-23 I assume Hoffman will win but I think it will be closer than the PPP poll.
I need to see some more polls but I believe Corzine will still win. If Christie wins there it will be a clean sweep for the republicans and it may not mean much, I think all these elections are based on local issues but it will give republicans a few days to crow.

shiloh said...

FWIW #5, 8, 11 and 15 are in Corzine's favor, carry on.

Surprising anything is in Corzine's favor, oh yea, his opponent Christie is in Corzine's favor lol again election's are about individual candidates actually campaigning against each other and in NJ as is the case quite often, the lesser of (2) evils prevails.

Plus the devil who is known has the advantage over the devil who is unknown. ;)

Forget about it!

connut said...

this is a stupid list.

Mark Grebner said...

" Which candidate has a headwind at their back ...?"

The technical term for such a "headwind" is a "tailwind", at least in aviation or aviary matters.

Juris said...

@Mark: Nate should have just used the word "wind at his back."

Then again, given that the original meaning of "windy city" referred to the blathering of politicians, maybe it would be better to omit this criterion. All politicians are windy.

Quixote said...

The technical term for having the wind at one's back is "flatulence."

Bart DePalma said...

15. Which candidate's party controls the state's electoral and judicial apparatus, in the event of a recount or otherwise disputed election?

Only a Dem would have this on a list of factors to predict who will receive the most votes.

Unfortunately, this last factor may be the deciding factor in NJ as it was in MN.

James said...

And decisive in the 2000 presidential election of course. Unfortunately, the apparatus is partisan, and it's a factor.

Juris said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Juris said...

@Bart: who controls the vote counting apparatus is pretty much a bipartisan "bias." For every MN (btw the Supreme Court was GOP dominated there), there has been a Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004.

I'd rather have our vote counting done as it is in, say Brazil, than how it's done here.

Jacob said...

Looks like at least 9 of these factors lean toward Corzine, though it is hard to say which are most important. BTW, does anyone know the process for recounts in NJ? I know they have no elected Secretary of State.

Jacob said...

Some miserable @$$hole said...

"Unfortunately, this last factor may be the deciding factor in NJ as it was in MN."


Anyone who actually followed the MN recount would know that it was fair and transparent (and more importantly, bipartisan) as I will explain below:

The actual recount observation was conducted by a bipartisan panel consisting of two Republican judges, one independent judge, one Democratic Judge, and the Democratic Secretary of State. Every ballot was viewed by representatives of both campaigns and by an independent counter in a very transparent process.

This bipartisan panel ruled unanimously that Franken had won by 225 votes.

Under the challenger-friendly MN election laws, Coleman took his case to court, forcing the opening of thousands of disputed absentee ballots in the hope of claiming a lead, which the Contest Court (one Republican, one Democrat, one Independent) allowed. The ballots did not go Coleman's way.

This bipartisan panel ruled unanimously that Franken had won by 312 votes.

In a last ditch effort, Coleman appealed the case to the MN Supreme Court, with it's Republican-appointed majority, delaying the seating of Senator Franken by another two and a half months.

This bipartisan Court ruled unanimously that Franken had won by 312 votes.

Coleman then conceded that he had lost fairly.

Nam Vet Joe From Jersey said...

All recounts in NJ are handled in Hudson County---don't worry about.

dsimon said...

Bart: Only a Dem would have this on a list of factors to predict who will receive the most votes.


It's not a Dem/Repub thing, it's reality. Florida 2000 or Ohio 2004, anyone?

Even people working with the best of intentions can be biased by their affiliations. It happens when people analyze the same information and reach different conclusions on policy matters, and it happens when people are trying to make supposedly "objective" determinations as well.

Alex S. said...

PPP shouldn't have polled New Jersey over Halloween weekend, only taking 2 days instead of their regular 4 days for each poll. The other most recent polls (Monmouth, Quinnipiac, YouGOV) are all within the margin of error. And as far as I know, PPP doesn't weight their polls, making them vulnerable to irregular changes.

Pragmatus said...

Jacob…

BDP doesn’t deal in facts—he whines in spin. He and Pete Kent are very much alike; there are virtually no thoughts in their posts that are not tweaked (if not outright falsified) in hopes of putting a glossy GOP spin on everything. Reality does not factor into it. They are hoping for some magical transubstantiation, although instead of water-into-wine they’re aiming for fantasy-into-fact.

So far their track records aren’t very enviable, but there’s not much besides good old fashioned wishin’ and hopin’ in the GOP armamentarium.

markymark said...

Juris said
'@Mark: Nate should have just used the word "wind at his back."'
-----------------------------

Thats 4 words.

Us Marks have to stick together!!

markymark said...

My predictions for this election cycle.

Virginia- McDonnell will win. Reasonably easily,but perhaps not quite as hugely as some polls suggest, somewhere between 5 and 8 points would be my guess.

New Jersey- Corzine wins. But by a lot less than the Daggett vote.

NY23rd- I do think this is very much a toss up. My feeling is that the Scozzafava endorsement might just push Owens over the top.

shrinkers said...

@markymark
NY23rd- I do think this is very much a toss up. My feeling is that the Scozzafava endorsement might just push Owens over the top.

This would be interesting. If Owens wins, I think the Republican establishment and the nutbat fringewing would each blame the other (rightly) for the 23rd going to a Dem for the first time in a century and a half.

The solution for the Republicans should be to pull together, and form a bigger tent. But I don't think that's the lesson they'd walk away with.

Regardless of whether Hoffman or Owens wins, though, the upside is that the Republicans have already lost that district so badly their candidate had to withdraw. This says something important about the nationwide status of the Republican Party, and that may be an important message going into the 2010 midterms.

Juris said...

OK, Mark. 4 words.

Now as for your last prediction, did you actually make one there? Is "toss up" allowed as a prediction?

As for me, I'll go McConnell, Corzine (partly the Obama factor), and Owens.

On the last race, has anybody analyzed the ground game, early voting, etc.? However, if there was a lot of early voting, then many Scozzafava votes may be locked in already, and recent polling may not be very telling if it hasn't accounted for early votes.

Trentonian Editor said...

How New Jersey settles recounts and the like,...

http://www.trentonian.com/articles/2009/09/30/opinion/doc4ac2ea0ac752e547609559.txt

Pragmatus said...

NY-23…

My guess—and it’s only a guess, based on gut instinct more than anything—is that Hoffman will be beaten badly. I think a lot of his “support” has been ballyhoo from the nutjobs, but in this I could be very wrong.

I still hope Hoffman wins, because it will do no damage to the Dem majority in the House (NY-23 was a GOP seat) but it will encourage the Freeptard lunatics to really assault the “ideological purity” of the entire GOP. Couldn’t happen to a nicer party. The political right will be pockmarked with bomb craters and strewn with wreckage within a year.

You only have to go here to see exactly what I mean.

Pragmatus said...

Department of Boo-Hoo…

Direct from the Freeper site, a plea for contributions—

“Free Republic is currently delivering over 1.2 million pageviews to over 230,000 visitors per day. That's 40 million pageviews to 7 million visitors per month or 120 million pageviews per quarter, 480 million pageviews per year. We currently have over 330,000 registered screen names on FR. Out of these millions of visits, hundreds of millions of pageviews, hundreds of thousands of registered FReepers and hundreds of thousands of regular lurkers only a relatively FEW actually donate the funds to keep FR alive.

(Bold mine.)

The GOP: the Party of No (Money for You).

Happy GOPer said...

Siena New York 23rd Congressional District Poll

Doug Hoffman (C) - 41%
Bill Owens (D) - 36%
Dede Scozzafava (R) - 6%

http://www.siena.edu/uploadedfiles/home/Parents_and_Community/Community_Page/SRI/SNY_Poll/23rd%20CD%20SNY%20Poll%20Release%204%20--%20FINAL.pdf

6p011168888bff970c said...

Looking at my sample ballot for NJ, I have a bad feeling that some people who want to vote for Daggett aren't going to be able to find him on the ballot, as they stand in the booth.

shrinkers said...

@Pragmatus
Direct from the Freeper site, a plea for contributions—

I think something the Freeper site doesn't take into account, is the staring-at-the-train-wreck effect. Of the millions of monthly visitors, a large percentage is likely to be people who are mouth-open gaping with disbelief at the stupidity of the site, and then giggling to their friends. These are not people likely to make contributions to keep the site open - it's entertaining, but there is better comedy elsewhere.

Mike said...

Jacob said...
Looks like at least 9 of these factors lean toward Corzine, though it is hard to say which are most important.
__________

It all depends; Corzine is the incumbent. Does that really help him and more than the fact he's the Democrat in a very blue state? If anything, it probably hurts him this time.

Nate was careful to note that there's up to 3 points available to a candidate with these questions. I think we'd probably all agree that at best Corzine gets 1 point, but that's vastly overstating things given his unfavorables.

Jacob said...

@ Mike

Very true, but Christie only benefits from 12, 13, 3, weakly from 1, and possibly from 7.

Corzine has a strong benefit from 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, and 15, with a marginal benefit from 6 and 14, and probably 9.

And it looks like 4 will go both ways.

It's hard to say which factors are most important though, and of course which other factors should be included (like favorable/ unfavorable in contrast to horse race numbers).

Ultimately this race still looks like a tossup.

Just John said...

The Republican Party: A Recent History

1980-2004: Party of Dough
2005-2008: Party of Doh!
2009-2010: Party of No
2011-20??: Party of Woe

But seriously, Christie has not shown himself to be superior to Corzine, so if turnout looks anything like previous elections, the D stays. If not, all bets are off.

Nobody knows what'll happen in NY-23. That's kind of been Nate's point all weekend.

Maine approves gay marriage 54-46. WA passes Ref. 71 60-40.

MidPointMan said...

"Nobody knows what'll happen in NY-23. That's kind of been Nate's point all weekend."

That is a generous spin on events. Nate should know what is going to happen, but has the blinders on these days.

It looks like the GOP / Conservatives will sweep the board tomorrow.

Hoffman now looks inevitable, which will accentuate his win, perhaps into the double digits.

This is what seems to have happened in Virginia as well. As it became clear that Deeds was going to lose, the gap widened.

Interestingly, we may be seeing the same trend play out in NJ.

All major polls show Corzine fading recently and Daggett as non-viable.

This will bump up Christie to +6 or +7 tomorrow.

If Democrats lose all three by a good margin, this may doom the public option in any form.

It may doom Health Care Reform entirely, though the media will do the best it can to push an alternative view of events.

Citizen Grim said...

My humble predictions:

GOP wins NY-23 by 5%
GOP wins NJ-Gov by 3%
GOP wins VA-Gov by 15%
ME declines gay marriage by 3%
WA passes Ref 71 by 9%

Yankees win in 6
NFC championship: Eagles/Saints
AFC championship: Steelers/Colts
Super Bowl: Eagles/Steelers
Finland wins Olympic Hockey gold

Citizen Grim said...

Err... not GOP in NY-23, but "independent." Whatev.

flwyd said...

I was about to say "If you have a headwind, it's not at your back," but then I imagined candidates A and B going in opposite directions. If A has a headwind, it's at B's back.

Just John said...

I'l tell you what mpm, Nate probably convinced himself ahead of time that a Conservative Party couldn't win and is interpreting the little data he has with that prejudice in the way.

But if some looney tunes extreme carpetbagger extremist like Hoffman DOES have a path to Congress, it has to be in an off-year election (check), the mainstream R has to drop out (check), the money has to flow into his coffers (check), outside influences have to be interested (check), the district has to tilt R (check), and turnout has to materialize (check????).

Perhaps his stars have aligned themselves just right this time.

shiloh said...

Bart DePalma said...

Unfortunately, this last factor may be the deciding factor in NJ as it was in MN.
~~~~~~~~~~


Still showing your sour grapes and being a sore loser re: MN, eh.

But it's a given for a winger like yourself 'cause how embarrassing for an incumbent Rep senator not to get 42% of the vote, but to add insult to injury, lose to a former frickin' comedian.

Yea, I'd be in denial too! lol

Let it go BDP, Franken is the Senator of Minnesota. Fairly elected by its citizens.

Ain't Democracy great! :)

shrinkers said...

shiloh,

Let's also remember that Coleman previously was beaten by a professional wrestler, and only won because he was running against a dead guy - who almost did beat him, and would have, if he hadn't been dead.

I live in Minnesota. The MN recount was, without doubt, the cleanest and most thorough, most transparent and most fair election contest of its kind anywhere.

Wingers like to compare it to Bush 2000 and Bush 2004, in an effort to make Bush's contests look reasonable. But the widespread nature of the fraud in FL and OH, coupled with the intense rightwing judicial activism in '00, render any such comparisons absurd on their face.

dsimon said...

MidPointMan: If Democrats lose all three by a good margin, this may doom the public option in any form.

I think that qualifies as the non sequitur of the day!