The Star Tribune reports that Al Franken holds a 48-vote lead over Norm Coleman, with thousands of withdrawn challenges having been added back in to the respective candidates' totals. This number would be roughly in accordance with the 35-50 vote lead projected by the Franken campaign.
The Star Tribune's reckoning appears to come from a spreadsheet (.xls) available on the Minnesota Secretary of State's website. The spreadsheet appears to show 3,191 challenged ballots resolved for Franken and 2,955 for Coleman -- a net gain of 236 for Franken, which would put him 48 votes ahead given Norm Coleman's 188 vote lead prior to the challenge phase of the recount process. An additional group of 542 challenges ballots were deemed to be illegal votes (undervotes, overvotes, etc.), or were assigned to third-party candidates.Challenged By Ballot Allocated To______
These are draft numbers, and as such are subject to change. Minnesota's Canvassing Board will meet again tomorrow morning to resolve a few odds and ends, apparently including the resolution of a small number of remaining challenged ballots.
__ Franken Coleman Other
Franken 66 2923 295
__ 2.0% 89.0% 9.0%
Coleman 3120 29 243
__ 92.0% 0.9% 7.2%
Both 5 3 4
__ 41.7% 25.0% 33.3%
Total 3191 2955 542
__ 47.7% 44.2% 8.1%
In all likelihood, however, Coleman will need to rely on the addition of rejected absentee ballots or the subtraction of so-called duplicate ballots in order to regain the lead from Franken. The former class of ballots will be resolved by the counties between now and December 31; the latter group may or may not be reviewed, depending on a ruling from the Minnesota Supreme Court anticipated tomorrow.
12.22.2008
Franken Maintains 48-Vote Lead
@ 6:25 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
37 comments
Norm has already declared 4 or 5 times that he has won. I don't know why we waste taxpayer money on this. Just take him at his word and move along. Stubborn people.
C'mon, Senator Franken! I hope it happens!
FIRST!!!!
First, I tells ya!
I am just so damn happy right now, I am downright irrational.
~ Latte
TYPO: "show 3,191 challenges ballots. . . ."
Should be challengeD ballots.
best news i have had all day. maybe since obama won!
well i guess now its on to court. any guesses for how long? coleman wont go down easy.
anyone think this forces coleman to OPEN those rejected absentees?
NATE: Huh? "which would put him 48 votes ahead given Norm Coleman's 188 votes ahead"
Do you mean "Coleman's 188 vote lead"?
Pursuant to the cop out MNSC decision, will the "5th pile" absentee ballots remain sealed until the parties "agree" to open them? If so, then Coleman will want to count every friggin one if he is behind and the duplicate b.s. doesn't confuse the CB into giving Coleman a lead.
On the other hand, there is room for a lot of gamesmanship (despite the MNSC's admonition not to act inappropriately -- a toothless gesture) if the result of each vote is known beforehand. (Of course, Coleman can try to cherry pick and only agree to military absentee ballots, I suppose.)
@STepper: there was an article in this morning's Star Tribune in which the counsel for Coleman implied that they might seek to increase the size of that "5th pile" -- presumably by looking at absentee ballots that were classified into one of the first 4 piles for some that might provide Coleman votes but were "misclassified" as ineligible.
If the Coleman campaign follows through with that we can expect to have every disqualified absentee ballot -- not just those in the 5th pile -- subject to a review.
So Theres this post and some guys like "FIRST" so im all like THIS IS GREAT NEWS! FOR JOHN MCCAIN!
and then theres this conservatroll and hes all complaining about the recount in minnesota and im like THIS IS GREAT NEWS! FOR JOHN MCCAIN!
and then Nate posts some poll numbers and im all like "THIS IS GREAT NEWS!" and Nate's like "Lemme guess...for john mccain, right?" and im all like actually i wasnt gonna say that..............FOR JOHN MCCAIN!
CUZ THIS IS MY UNITED STATES OF FIVETHIRTYEIGHT
AND THIS IS UNITED STATES OF FIVETHIRTYEIGHT
AND THIS IS UNITED STATES OF FIVETHIRTYEIGHT
Whoah! Easy on the egg nog!
Does this include the 12 military overseas absentee ballots they found?
Can someone explain the duplicate ballot situation please? I understand that sometimes duplicate ballots are made by election officials either because original ballot would not scan or it's an email ballot from overseas. And, if I understand correctly, the original and the duplicate are supposed to be so marked and kept together. So, the problem is that there are duplicates without attached originals, or originals without attached duplicates, or, some combination of both. Coleman thinks both duplicates and originals were counted in recount, and wants some ballots uncounted. Did I get that basically right? If I did, then is Coleman trying to uncount dupe without attached originals or originals without attached dupes (seems like it cannot be both or otherwise you're missing valid votes)? How many votes are at issue? Is there any reason to believe there is a sysematic bias in the alleged double counted ballots?
Every absentee ballot should be reviewed - they deserve the same right to vote as people who voted on election day.
But lets get this review done faster and put a lid on this...
....though the course may change some time, rivers always reach the sea.
another mike-
Do a goole news search. The ballots from one precinct were likely double counted and it accounts for about plus 50 for Franken. Yup, plus 50.
LOL!
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/20/politics/main4679466.shtml
@another Mike- yeah, that's the basic situation.
@Stepper- It's worse than you think. Those envelopes are signed. Each side has partisan lists. So they have a very good idea of who will gets the votes in many if not most of the ballots, by party, not just by broad demographic category.
@ fred- I checked that link and it doesn't say remotely what you claim. It's Coleman's lawyer estimating that Franken may have picked up a net 50 state-wide from duplicates. As you should know from many previous posts here (esp. from ecarlson) the dups are scattered around many precincts. Likely Coleman dups (mostly Dakota county) haven't been tabulated. So I think we can take 50 as pretty much an upper bound for the Coleman gain if these are tossed. With Franken ahead by 48......
Yes Fred, a 50 vote shift is what Coleman is saying, but Coleman's pile is only part of the duplicate ballots out there. Franken was complaining about this much earlier and using a larger number that probably favored him in their demographics (Fox news has a perfect example). As Nate has already said, the duplicates are pretty close to random sample. So we can expect them to fall out more or less along the same lines as the vote itself. Is Coleman going to get 50 more votes from 500 in a random sample? The God's of statistics say no.
Of course, Coleman has no actual proof that ANY of these votes were double counted. Indeed they almost certainly won't, because the main reason for making a duplicate is that the original didn't scan properly!
Both points lead to Coleman not making up 48 votes and/or losing his challenge in court. Now, perhaps the latter outcome is what he expects and hopes for, because he can then cry foul head to federal court where he hopes THEY will overturn the vote and seat him.
I think I probably need to look at Coleman's actual petition to the MN Supreme court itself to make heads or tails of this issue. Anyone got a link? I'm googling but not finding.
oooooh - mbw attacking me instead Nate tonight!
It is one estimate of the votes.
The first dups were from one precinct, and it is thought by most that they were double counted.
We will all find out tomorrow.
the fact that this is only the BEST NEWS EVER FOR JOHN MCCAIN goes without saying, but bears repeating.
This is the great news for John McCain. Not as good as Ms Palin's future in-law being busted for felony possession, but still, best news ever.
~ Latte
PS: not sure if you saw MN Att General brief filed with the MN SC in re the duplicates law suit (www.theuptake.org has the details), and the Hennepin County Attorney supporting brief underlining some of Lori Swanson's points. The way I see it, wrong venue on top of everything else. The suit shall be tossed, and that is my precise mathematical analysis. I predict the suit will be dismissed between the hours of 5 and 6 PM tomorrow.
~ Latte
does anynone know how to tell from the spreadsheet which challenges were accepted and which were rejected? What do the codes in column H mean?
There is a Star Tribune web site that details the number of absentee ballots by reason (1 to 5) per county with the fifth group being those that are at issue. The site also shows the pre-recount vote totals for Franken and Coleman. As of Monday evening, 52 of the 87 counties have completed the review of the absentee ballots with a total of 723 ballots in the fifth group. If the "group 5" votes are split by the same percentage as the original votes in each county, Coleman would get 360 to Franken's 363. The URL is http://ww2.startribune.com/news/metro/elections/returns/2008/recount/absentee.html
Absentee Ballot Sorting - Has it restarted?
When Colemn issued his challenge, the counties stopped sorting the absentee ballots into the 5 piles - the 5th piled was for WRONGLY rejected absentee ballots. The Court ruled against Coleman and said to count the wrongly rejected ballots. Have counties which had not sorted their rejected absentee ballots started sorting? If not, why not and when will they. The Court wanted them counted by Dec 31
Minnesota Public Radio says the Attorney General will have something to say about protecting privacy of absentee voters on Tuesday.Where can we find out how it is going? Time's awastin.
I wonder if Nate or someone could address something I've been pondering.
These "5th pile" absentees will only be opened and counted if both campaigns agree, right? Not having seen a MN absentee ballot in person, I imagine there's probably a signature or name/address or other identifying information on the outside of the ballot to tell WHOSE ballot it is.
Will the campaigns be able to see that info when they're debating what ballots to reject? Because I would imagine both sides have enough data banked from the campaign to know how likely it is that Absentee Voter X was a Franken (or Coleman) voter.
If indeed the campaigns will be able to know whose absentee ballots they're debating, I could see one side or the other refusing to accept a ballot simply because they know it's probably a vote for the other guy.
In other words, this could get ugly quick.
If the Coleman campaign follows through with that we can expect to have every disqualified absentee ballot -- not just those in the 5th pile -- subject to a review.
As they should, actually. Logistically, it's a nightmare, but how do we KNOW each and every county (87?) used the same exacting criteria on sorting the ballot envelopes into the five piles?
Not to mention the elephant in the room, how many absentee voters who cast "defective" ballots were allowed to correct such defects, in SOME instances, in SOME counties?
WV-castop-ketchup.
Keep on fighting Al! Having Al Franken in the Senate is a very very groovy thing and it must happen.
Nate, just to be pedantic, a 48 vote lead isn't "roughly in accordance with the 35-50 vote lead projected by the Franken campaign", it IS in accordance. 33 would be "roughly" as would 51, surely if they're going to project a 15 vote range, and the result is in the range, then they should get kudos for that.
Back on topic - man, this recount is glacially slow. I mean, thorough is good, but this is beyond thorough and on into ridiculous. There are only a few important decisions to make - general rules for what challenges will be accepted, and what to do with the fifth pile votes. Each day we see a bit more argy-bargy about these issues from the campaigns and a few hundred votes counted, and about once a week a decision from the canvassing board. How many people are working on this? And how do I get a job that pays that well for so little actual output?
This has probably been addressed before, but I'm tired of hearing Fox Noise complain about Franken voters being too stupid to know how to vote "correctly." I direct Fox Noise, and anyone else who is interested, to the voting instruction at the top of most MN ballots:
"To vote, completely fill in the oval(s) next to your choice(s) like this: [perfectly filled in oval]"
I've looked at 2400 challenged ballots, and if the voting instruction were enforced, at least half the votes for both Coleman and Franken would have to be tossed. Why? Because part of the oval is not filled in. Anything less than 100% filled in is technically not a vote. Marks beyond the oval are fine, if irrelevant.
So it looks to me like MN voters on both sides are...well, no. Looks to me like the "can't follow directions" complaints arise from a blindered class of anally retentives.
I think that if this thing stays close to nates 27 vote est. in the end then we need dunk Nate in the lake until he confesses he's a witch!
Stone em! Stone em!
Eric in Austin
A lot of the "stolen election" talk traces back to John Lott. Lott has been famously wrong before, and he's wrong about Coleman-Franken.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/11/17/franken/
http://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2008/12/22/5476/john_lott_wrong_again
http://www.minnpost.com/braublog/2008/12/19/5441/recount_how_lott_misleads
Someone asked about the actual petition from Coleman: the website for the minnesota courts -- mncourts.gov -- has a link to all the filings about the Senate Race. Having read it, I think Coleman's approach uses the presumption that the election judges acted correctly to presume how they acted incorrectly (and yes, I know that doesn't read right, but that's the illogical approach of the petition).
As to the underlying issue -- on election night, the judges were supposed to make duplicate ballots and mark the duplicate and original to match them (e.g. duplicate 1 and original 1, duplicate 2 and original 2, etc.). The originals were then supposed to go into a separate envelope and the duplicates were mixed in with the other ballots that were fed to the machine.
For the recount, the duplicates were supposed to be sorted out and matched with the originals from the "originals envelope," and then the originals were to be used to determine the votes.
Coleman wants to assume that the duplicates were made (as required by law) but either the duplicate or the original was not marked (even though that is also required by law).
Franken believes that you can't make that assumption. Three things could have happened -- 1) no duplicate was made; 2) either the duplicate or the original was not marked; or 3) either the duplicate or the original was misplaced. Determining which of these three is correct is a precinct-by-precinct process that is appopriate for an election contest, not a recount.
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,潤滑液,自慰套,威而柔,威而柔,威而柔,威而柔,自慰套,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套,潤滑液,威而柔,FleshLight,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,跳蛋,按摩棒,FleshLight,充氣娃娃,情趣商品,情趣網站,情趣網站,潤滑液,性感內衣,充氣娃娃,按摩棒,情趣精品,跳蛋,情趣網站,情趣商品,跳蛋,FleshLight,充氣娃娃,情趣內衣,情趣精品,按摩棒,威而柔,自慰套,成人玩具,Nexus,lelo,聰明球,後庭,後庭g點,g點,美國fleshlight,STU訓練大師,Fleshgirls,Toys Heart,Tenga,日本 Vibratex,日本Toys Heart ,日本Tenga,美國aneros,rudeboy,英國rudeboy,英國Rocksoff,德國Fun Factory,Fun Factory,英國甜筒造型按摩座,甜筒造型按摩座,英國Rock Chic ,瑞典 Lelo ,英國Emotional Bliss,英國 E.B,荷蘭 Natural Contours,荷蘭 N C,美國 OhMiBod,美國 OMB,Naughti Nano ,音樂按摩棒,ipod按摩棒,美國 The Screaming O,美國TSO,美國TOPCO,美國Doc Johnson,美國CA Exotic,美國CEN,美國Nasstoy,美國Tonguejoy,英國Je Joue,美國Pipe Dream,美國California Exotic,美國NassToys,美國Vibropod,美國Penthouse,仿真按摩棒,矽膠按摩棒,猛男倒模,真人倒模,仿真倒模,PJUR,Zestra,適趣液,穿戴套具,日本NPG,雙頭龍,FANCARNAL,日本NIPPORI,日本GEL,日本Aqua Style,美國WET,費洛蒙,費洛蒙香水,仿真名器,av女優,打炮,做愛,性愛,口交,吹喇叭,肛交,魔女訓練大師,無線跳蛋,有線跳蛋,震動棒,震動保險套,震動套,TOY-情趣用品,情趣用品網,情趣購物網,成人用品網,情趣用品討論,成人購物網,鎖精套,鎖精環,持久環,持久套,拉珠,逼真按摩棒,名器,超名器,逼真老二,電動自慰,自慰,打手槍,仿真女郎,SM道具,SM,性感內褲,仿真按摩棒,pornograph,hunter系列,h動畫,成人動畫,成人卡通,情色動畫,情色卡通,色情動畫,色情卡通,無修正,禁斷,人妻,極悪調教,姦淫,近親相姦,顏射,盜攝,偷拍,本土自拍,素人自拍,公園露出,街道露出,野外露出,誘姦,迷姦,輪姦,凌辱,痴漢,痴女,素人娘,中出,巨乳,調教,潮吹,av,a片,成人影片,成人影音,線上影片,成人光碟,成人無碼,成人dvd,情色影音,情色影片,情色dvd,情色光碟,航空版,薄碼,色情dvd,色情影音,色情光碟,線上A片,免費A片,A片下載,成人電影,色情電影,TOKYO HOT,SKY ANGEL,一本道,SOD,S1,ALICE JAPAN,皇冠系列,老虎系列,東京熱,亞熱,武士系列,新潮館,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,整型,水噹噹,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,珠海,下川島,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,婚友,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友,交友,交友,婚友社,婚友社,婚友社,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,越南新娘,外籍新娘,外籍新娘,台中坐月子中心,搬家公司,搬家,搬家,搬家公司,線上客服,網頁設計,線上客服,網頁設計,網頁設計,土地貸款,免費資源,電腦教學,wordpress,人工植牙,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,
豆豆聊天室 aio交友愛情館 2008真情寫真 2009真情寫真 aa片免費看 捷克論壇 微風論壇 大眾論壇 plus論壇 080視訊聊天室 情色視訊交友90739 美女交友-成人聊天室 色情小說 做愛成人圖片區 豆豆色情聊天室 080豆豆聊天室 小辣妹影音交友網 台中情人聊天室 桃園星願聊天室 高雄網友聊天室 新中台灣聊天室 中部網友聊天室 嘉義之光聊天室 基隆海岸聊天室 中壢網友聊天室 南台灣聊天室 南部聊坊聊天室 台南不夜城聊天室 南部網友聊天室 屏東網友聊天室 台南網友聊天室 屏東聊坊聊天室 雲林網友聊天室 大學生BBS聊天室 網路學院聊天室 屏東夜語聊天室 孤男寡女聊天室 一網情深聊天室 心靈饗宴聊天室 流星花園聊天室 食色男女色情聊天室 真愛宣言交友聊天室 情人皇朝聊天室 上班族成人聊天室 上班族f1影音視訊聊天室 哈雷視訊聊天室 080影音視訊聊天室 38不夜城聊天室 援交聊天室080 080哈啦聊天室 台北已婚聊天室 已婚廣場聊天室 夢幻家族聊天室 摸摸扣扣同學會聊天室 520情色聊天室 QQ成人交友聊天室 免費視訊網愛聊天室 愛情公寓免費聊天室 拉子性愛聊天室 柔情網友聊天室 哈啦影音交友網 哈啦影音視訊聊天室 櫻井莉亞三點全露寫真集 123上班族聊天室 尋夢園上班族聊天室 成人聊天室上班族 080上班族聊天室 6k聊天室 粉紅豆豆聊天室 080豆豆聊天網 新豆豆聊天室 080聊天室 免費音樂試聽 流行音樂試聽 免費aa片試看免費a長片線上看 色情貼影片 免費a長片 本土成人貼圖站 大台灣情色網 台灣男人幫論壇 A圖網 嘟嘟成人電影網 火辣春夢貼圖網 情色貼圖俱樂部 台灣成人電影 絲襪美腿樂園 18美女貼圖區 柔情聊天網 707網愛聊天室聯盟 台北69色情貼圖區 38女孩情色網 台灣映像館 波波成人情色網站 美女成人貼圖區 無碼貼圖力量 色妹妹性愛貼圖區 日本女優貼圖網 日本美少女貼圖區 亞洲風暴情色貼圖網 哈啦聊天室 美少女自拍貼圖 辣妹成人情色網 台北女孩情色網 辣手貼圖情色網 AV無碼女優影片 男女情色寫真貼圖 a片天使俱樂部 萍水相逢遊戲區 平水相逢遊戲區 免費視訊交友90739 免費視訊聊天 辣妹視訊 - 影音聊天網 080視訊聊天室 日本美女肛交 美女工廠貼圖區 百分百貼圖區 亞洲成人電影情色網 台灣本土自拍貼圖網 麻辣貼圖情色網 好色客成人圖片貼圖區 711成人AV貼圖區 台灣美女貼圖區 筱萱成人論壇 咪咪情色貼圖區 momokoko同學會視訊 kk272視訊 情色文學小站 成人情色貼圖區 嘟嘟成人網 嘟嘟情人色網 - 貼圖區 免費色情a片下載 台灣情色論壇 成人影片分享 免費視訊聊天區 微風 成人 論壇 kiss文學區 taiwankiss文學區
外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 ,
外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
菲
梵,
Post a Comment