12.08.2008

2010 Senate Rankings, Revised and Extended

Time to start over. Rather than giving you the third and final installment of our 2010 Senate Race Rankings, I'm going to re-do the project from scratch, ranking all 37 potential contests from top to bottom based on their probability of changing parties.

The reasons for this are twofold. Firstly, there's been quite a bit of news in any number of these contests, meaning that things we thought we knew a couple of weeks ago may no longer apply. And secondly, there are enough contingencies in so many of these races (Will so-and-so retire? Will so-and-so run for office?) that a more systematic treatment of them is in order. What I mean by this is that it's worth going through and calculating the conditional probabilities. In California, for example, the race will look much different if Arnold Schwarzenegger enters than if he does not, which means I'm going to show you something like this:

75%    Generic R vs Boxer (D)                       5%
25% Schwarzenegger (R) vs Boxer (D) 30%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 11.3%
What does this mean? The numbers along the left-hand column indicate the probability of various scenarios occurring. In this case, I think there's about a 25% chance that Schwarzenegger will run for the seat, and a 75% chance that he will not. The numbers in the right-handed column, then, represent the chances of the opposition party picking up the seat if each of these contingencies occurs; in this case, I think the Republicans have about a 30% chance of unseating Barbara Boxer if Schwarzenegger is the nominee, but only a 5% chance otherwise. I then multiply all these numbers together to give you the joint probability: Republicans have about an 11% chance of winning California's seat, combining those times that Schwarzenegger runs with those times that he does not.

Where, you might be asking, do all these probabilities (30%, 5%, 25%) come from? They're my educated guesstimates -- nothing more and nothing less -- based on a combination of approval ratings, the strength of each party's organization in that state, rumor, gossip, innuendo, and various other intangibles. You should not regard the numbers as being especially precise or meaningful; they are ballpark estimates, a codification of my subjective knowledge.

One final reminder and caveat: the races are ranked strictly in order of their likelihood of changing parties. This is not quite the same thing a ranking of the most vulnerable incumbents, because it accounts for potentialities like retirements, as well as inferences about the probable strength of the opposition candidates. In Iowa, for instance, I assign the Democrats about a one-in-four chance of picking off Chuck Grassley's seat, but nearly all of that stems from the (distinct) possibility that Grassley will retire -- his seat should not be especially vulnerable if he decides to run for re-election.

1. Kansas (R-Open; Brownback retiring)

Believe it or not, this might be the most likely seat in the country to flip parties. And it's all because of Governor Kathleen Sebelius, who announced Saturday that she was withdrawing herself from consideration for Barack Obama's cabinet. This comes as a mild surprise; the scuttlebutt I'd heard is that Sebelius, who is term-limited in 2010, would have liked the opportunity to serve in Obama's cabinet. Sebelius enjoys politics, and that she's turned the opportunity down suggests she has something else up her sleeve. Unless that something is becoming DNC Chair, that probably means a senate run.

Sebelius is no shoo-in if she runs -- Kansas hasn't elected a Democrat to the Senate since the Great Depression, and KS-1's Jerry Moran, who has already announced his intention to run for the seat, would be a credible opponent. But with her sky-high approval ratings, Sebelius is probably the favorite to win the seat. As Sam Brownback is likely to run for governor, it might also help her in terms of voter psychology if Kansans simply feel as though they're swapping the two, rather than turning a traditionally Republican seat over to a Democrat.

In the event that Sebelius has other plans, the Democrats' odds are daunting, as Kansas would likely revert back to its red-leaning steady state, though current lieutenant governor (and ex-GOPer) Mark Parkinson might have a fighting chance.
70%    Sebelius (D) vs Generic R                   60%
30% Generic D vs Generic R 5%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 43.5%
2. Pennsylvania (R-Specter)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Arlen Specter (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Rasmussen 12/2 60 35 +25
Quinnipiac 11/26 56 23 +33
Strategic Vision 11/1 53 34 +19
There are a lot of ways that Arlen Specter could lose his seat.

First, obviously, his health is not good.

Second, he could get primaried out. As the Democrats made fairly massive voter registration gains in Pennsylvania throughout 2008, what remains of the Republican primary electorate is the conservative base, and the very conservative Pat Toomey is threatening to challenge Specter again after having lost to him by just 2 points in the Republican primary in 2004.

Third, the Democrats might be able to beat Specter straight up. Although Specter's approval ratings remain strong, the fact that Chris Matthews has been able to poll close to him in some recent surveys suggests that much of that support is soft, making him vulnerable against the right Democrat (which might or might not be Matthews). Specter is in an unenviable position: if he obstructs Barack Obama's agenda, he'll anger Democrats in this structurally blue state, but if he sides with Democrats too often, he'll be vulnerable to a primary challenge.
60%    Generic D vs Specter (R)                  22.5%
40% Generic D vs Generic R 70%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 41.5%
3. Ohio (R-Voinovich)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: George Voinovich (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Strategic Vision 11/1 53 37 +16
SurveyUSA 10/18 51 39 +12
Quinnipiac 8/8 51 32 +19
This parallels the Specter race in certain respects, winnable either through retirement (Marc Ambinder has suggested that Voinovich might hang it up) or through a straight-up takeover (Voinovich is in fact a bit less popular than Specter). But there are a couple of mitigating factors. Firstly, there's no indication that Voinovich will face a serious primary challenge, which removes at least once concern for him. And secondly, if Voinovich retires, the Republicans have a fairly strong potential alternative in Rob Portman, who has suggested he might be interested in the position.

With that said, Voinovich still probably represents the Republicans' best chance of holding onto their seat. The structural advantages of incumbency are worth something, whereas Voinovich's mediocre approval ratings likely reflect the tough climate for Ohio Republicans in general right now rather than anything about Voinovich in particular; those cooties would probably transfer to any potential Republican alternative, in other words. Portman, meanwhile, while a capable administrator, is relatively unproven electorally.
60%    Generic D vs Voinovich (R)                  30%
20% Generic D vs Portman (R) 50%
20% Generic D vs Generic R 60%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 40.0%
4. Florida (R-Open; Martinez retiring)

I expected Florida to rank somewhere in the top two, but upon further review, Jeb Bush's potential entry into the race complicates things for Democrats, as Bush has star power that no Democrat in the state can match and as he left Florida's governorship with his popularity largely intact. Furthermore, I indeed think Bush is fairly likely to run, as among other things he might feel compelled to restore dignity to his surname.
67%    Generic D vs Bush (R)                       30%
33% Generic D vs Generic R 50%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 38.3%
5. Kentucky (R-Bunning)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Jim Bunning (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 10/18 40 44 -4
It's easy to understand why Democrats are salivating over this opportunity. Bunning nearly lost in 2004, a relatively good cycle for Republicans, against a fairly marginal Democratic opponent; he's now six years older and no more popular than he was before. Still, this is one state that moved away from Democrats in 2008 (although they retain a party identification advantage) and one state in which campaigning against Obama might pay dividends. Bunning's goal, in other words, is to turn this into a referendum on the President rather than a referendum on himself.

The Democrats' odds of a pickup improve significantly if Ben Chandler decides to enter, although Chris Cillizza thinks he's somewhat unlikely to. Republican odds might go up, frankly, if Bunning decides to retire, although for now he appears game for another go-around.
60%    Generic D vs Bunning (R)                    30%
20% Chandler (D) vs Bunning (R) 50%
10% Generic D vs Generic R 25%
10% Chandler (D) vs Generic R 50%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 35.3%
6. Nevada (D-Reid)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Harry Reid (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Research 2000 11/24 38 54 -16
Mason-Dixon 8/14 46 43 +3
I wanted to rank this race higher, since Reid's approval ratings are just awful, and are unlikely to be improved by the flak he'll take as the Majority Leader. But structurally speaking, the Republicans aren't in the position that they'd like to be in the Silver State. Nevada is turning blue very quickly, with the Democrats having made huge voter registration gains in 2008, and the Republicans have recruitment problems, as among their two most likely candidates, John Porter just lost his House seat, and as Lieutenant Governor Brian Krolicki was just indicted. The most probable outcome is an ugly, expensive win for Reid, although I give the Republicans' slightly better than a one in three chance of finding a compelling candidate somewhere and taking Reid down. Reid also might be vulnerable to a primary challenge, which could either help or hinder the Democrats' chances depending on the circumstances.
Probability of Republican Pickup                  35.0%
7. Missouri (R-Bond)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Kit Bond (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 10/18 51 42 +9
PPP 8/20 44 43 +1
I may have underrated this race originally, as various trial heats show any of several Democrats polling within the margin of error against Bond. Retirement is also a possibility. Still, Missouri is not quite the swing state it once was.
80%    Generic D vs Bond (R)                     27.5%
20% Generic D vs Generic R 50%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 32.0%
8. North Carolina (R-Burr)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Richard Burr (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
PPP 6/17 27 26 +1
SurveyUSA 11/2006 44 42 +2
Burr occupies North Carolina's buyer's remorse seat, which has changed parties five times in the past five elections; his tepid approval ratings suggest that he might not escape the curse. Still, Tarheel Democrats won't have the benefit of Barack Obama's coattails in 2010, nor are they likely to run into another campaign run as ineptly as Elizabeth Dole's.
Probability of Democratic Pickup                  25.0%
9. Iowa (R-Grassley)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Chuck Grassley (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 10/18 63 29 +34
Selzer 2/19 67 18 +49
This has moved up slightly on retirement rumors, and also rumors that Grassley might get a serious challenge (e.g. from Tom Vilsack or Bruce Braley) even if he doesn't drop out. I remain steadfastly unpersuaded that Democrats have much of a shot at winning this seat unless Grassley leaves it open; getting a +34 approval score with the way the US Congress is perceived nowadays is no small accomplishment. With that said, if someone like Vilsack were to form an exploratory committee, he might conceivably bluff Grassley into retiring (or at least into lining up with Barack Obama on cloture votes).
70%    Generic D vs Grassley (R)                    5%
30% Generic D vs Generic R 70%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 24.5%
10. New Hampshire (R-Gregg)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Judd Gregg (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Strategic Vision 10/28 53 37 +16
UNH 7/16 53 23 +30
Dartmouth 4/30 38 27 +11
With Jeanne Shaheen having defeated John Sununu on November 4th, Gregg is now the only Republican among New Hampshire's four-person congressional delegation, leading a lot of Democrats to assume that he will be their next victim. Gregg's approval ratings, however, are considerably stronger than Sununu's were, and the Democrats don't offer any opponent with Shaheen's name-brand. New Hampshire, moreover, maintains its libertarian streak, and Gregg's fiscal conservatism may play well in the current economic environment, although his having voted for the bailout could prove a liability.
Probability of Democratic Pickup                  22.5%
11. Delaware (D-Open; Kaufman retiring)

Republican hopes probably rely on At-Large Representative Mike Castle running for the seat, something which I haven't heard one way or the other about, but which might not be entirely implausible since Castle is too old to wait for a better opportunity. If Beau Biden throws his hat in the ring for 2010, as is somewhat likely, that might be a deterrent to Castle.
50%    Generic R vs Biden (D)                       5%
25% Generic R vs Generic D 7.5%
15% Castle (R) vs Generic D 50%
10% Castle (R) vs Biden (D) 40%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 15.9%
12. Colorado (D-Salazar)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Ken Salazar (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
PPP 8/6 39 36 +3
SurveyUSA 11/2006 56 36 +20
This remains one of the theoretically more viable pickup opportunities for Republicans, especially if the background political environment beings to swing in their favor, but Colorado is another state that's turning blue in a hurry, and there's no one Republican opponent that Colorado Democrats seem particularly worried about. Ex-Gov Bill Owens might be the closest thing to an exception, but he's declined his last couple of chances to run for national office.
Probability of Republican Pickup                  15.0%
13. Illinois (D-???)

It's hard to get good information on what Rod Blagojevich is likely to do with his senate appointment, although one source suggests that Blagojevich is inclined to pick an African-American. If so, Blagojevich would be taking a significant risk if he appointed Jesse Jackson Jr., who might be the plurality choice of Illinois Democrats, but who has little support outside of his base. That said, the Illinois Republican bench is incredibly weak, and even Jackson would probably be a favorite to win re-election.
70%    Generic R vs Generic D                     30%
30% Generic R vs Jackson (D) 10%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 15.0%
14. Texas (possibly R-Open or R-??)

This is Kay Bailey Hutchinson's seat. I'm going to put this on our radar screen because on Friday, Hutchinson launched an exploratory committee to challenge Rick Perry for governor, and is better than even money to resign from the Senate to pursue that opportunity; one TV station goes so far as saying that she's "confirmed" a bid for the governorship. This makes all the sense in the world for Hutchinson: she's quite likely to beat Perry in the primary, and if she prevailed in the general, would become a star of her party as governor of the largest red state in the land. If this happens, Democrats have a couple of potentially intriguing candidates: TX-17's Chet Edwards, and Houston Mayor Bill White, who was thought to be contemplating a run for governor but who could re-direct his efforts to the Senate as Hutchinson represents a more formidable opponent than Perry.
33%    Hutchison keeps Senate Seat                 --
67% Generic D vs Generic R 20%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 13.3%
15. Arizona (R-McCain)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: John McCain (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Research 2000 10/29 58 41 +17
SurveyUSA 11/2006 61 34 +27
This race was originally to have rated much higher, but Janet Napolitano appears to be out of the running after being nominated to head Homeland Security, whereas John McCain now says he'll be up for re-election. It is unlikely that an up-and-coming Democrat like Gabrielle Giffords would want to risk her stature by running against McCain, especially when Arizona also has an open governor's seat.

With that said, some Republican observers were surprised by the speed with which McCain declared his interest in the 2010 race. His relationships with the Senate Republican caucus are lukewarm, and McCain may find he has less interest in the banalities of the Senate after spending the better part of a year away from the chamber. Retirement, in other words, remains a possibility, in which case the race should draw a credible Democratic challenger, although popular Republican congressman Jeff Flake would likely be the favorite.
75%    Generic D vs McCain (R)                      5%
25% Generic D vs Generic R 35%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 12.5%
16. Arkansas (D-Lincoln)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Blanche Lincoln (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Arkansas Poll 10/11 54 20 +34
SurveyUSA 11/2006 55 37 +18
This is another race that I planned to rank higher originally, but the buzz I'm hearing is that Mike Huckabee is disinclined to be interested in the seat. In theory, this should be an intriguing seat to Republicans even if Huckabee does not run, as Arkansas is turning substantially redder. But since Lincoln's approval ratings are strong and since the Republicans just let Mark Pryor run unopposed, I wouldn't hold my breath.
90%    Generic R vs Lincoln (D)                     7%
10% Huckabee (R) vs Lincoln (D) 60%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 12.3%
17. California (D-Boxer)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Barbara Boxer (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 10/18 49 42 +7
PPIC 9/13 44 39 +5
Field Poll 5/22 48 31 +17
An Arnold Schwarzenegger entry would certainly attract a lot of fanfare, and a poll taken a year ago had him running even with Barbara Boxer. However, the Governator's approval ratings have since slumped significantly, and there's no tangible sign that he's interested in the position. Apart from Schwarzenegger, there isn't another obvious top-tier Republican opponent.
75%    Generic R vs Boxer (D)                       5%
25% Schwarzenegger (R) vs Boxer (D) 30%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 11.3%
18. North Dakota (D-Dorgan)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Byron Dorgan (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 11/2006 75 21 +54
Byron Dorgan is probably too popular to elicit a challenge from Governor John Hoeven, who just got re-elected and can afford to wait for a better cycle. If Hoeven were to run, however, we'd have a barnburner on our hands.
80%    Generic R vs Dorgan (D)                      2%
20% Hoeven (R) vs Dorgan (D) 45%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 10.6%
19. New York (D-??? née Clinton)

One rumor we've heard is that Rudy Giuliani is concerned about his ability to defeat David Paterson and might run for Senate instead if Paterson appoints a no-name candidate (e.g. anyone not named "Cuomo" or "Kennedy").
50%    Generic R vs Cuomo or Kennedy (D)            2%
35% Generic R vs Generic D 10%
15% Giuliani (R) vs Generic D 40%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 10.5%
20. Connecticut (D-Dodd)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Chris Dodd (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Hartford Courant 10/29 43 46 -3
Quinnipiac 6/28 51 34 +17
Ordinarily, an opponent with a negative approval rating would be a prime target, but among the two Republicans with some statewide cachet, Jodi Rell has no reason to leave the governor's mansion, and Chris Shays just lost his House seat and says he isn't interested in the Senate. I'm assigning a 10 percent probability of a Republican victory as a default, but they'll need to find a candidate first.
Probability of Republican Pickup                  10.0%
21. Oklahoma (R-Coburn)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Tom Coburn (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Sooner Poll 7/21 59 24 +35
SurveyUSA 11/2006 50 38 +12
Probably won't be competitive, but Democrats have a couple of contingencies to contemplate: (i) Democratic Governor Brad Henry is ridiculously popular and will be term-limited in 2010, although he had indicated in the past that he wasn't interested in running for the Senate; (ii) Coburn is less than 100% positive that he wants to run for re-election.
70%    Generic D vs Coburn (R)                      1%
15% Henry (D) vs Coburn (R) 30%
10% Generic D vs Generic R 10%
5% Henry (D) vs Generic R 50%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 8.7%
22. Wisconsin (D-Feingold)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Russ Feingold (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Strategic Vision 11/1 57 33 +24
SurveyUSA 10/18 53 43 +10
WisPolitics.com 6/9 59 29 +30
Feingold does not look at all vulnerable now, but there is a chance he could become so if the mood of the country changes. WI-1's Paul Ryan, who has a history of overperforming in his district, would probably need to be the challenger.
75%    Generic R vs Feingold (D)                    3%
25% Ryan vs Feingold (D) 20%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 7.3%
23. Hawaii (D-Inouye)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Daniel Inouye (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 11/2006 68 26 +42
Inoyue is a local institution and will not be defeated unless he retires or is unable to run for office, although that is not entirely unlikely since he'll be 86 years old by 2010. The Republicans will then need Governor Linda Lingle to run (who will be term-limited in 2010), who still might might be a slight underdog against Mazie Hirono or Neil Abercrombie in this very blue state. It's a longshot parlay for the GOP, but not inherently an impossible one.
75%    Generic R vs Inoyue (D)                    0.1%
12.5% Lingle (R) vs Generic D 45%
12.5% Generic R vs Generic D 5%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 6.3%
24. Alaska (R-Murkowski)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Lisa Murkowski (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Hays Research 3/11 63 33 +30
SurveyUSA 11/2006 54 41 +13
If there's action here, it's liable to be in the primary rather than in the general election. Most Republicans with aspirations for national office would prefer to be a governor rather than a senator. But Sarah Palin is potentially an exception, as Alaska's literal and figurative distance from Washington make it difficult for her to expand her network or her brand. Meanwhile, governance is likely to become substantially harder in Alaska if oil prices remain low, as the state relies on oil royalties for the bulk of its revenue.

Lisa Murkowski, in other words, is not being entirely paranoid when she's warning Palin to stay away from her seat. The potential opening for Democrats is if Murkowski is bloodied but not beaten by Palin, either surviving a tough primary challenge, or perhaps losing credibility by getting in a public spat with the 'Cuda. This is also, in theory, the sort of seat a third-party candidate might target.
80%    Generic D vs Murkowski (R)                 7.5%
20% Generic D vs Palin (R) 1%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 6.2%
25. Georgia (R-Isakson)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Johnny Isakson (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
PPP 11/24 30 25 +5
Strategic Vision 11/1 50 38 +12
Although Isakson's approval scores are not terrific, this race has been demoted significantly as a result of Saxby Chambliss' strong performance in Georgia's runoff this week. The Democrats, moreover, lack strong candidates in Georgia, and will need some time to build a bench.
Probability of Democratic Pickup                  6.0%
26. Louisiana (R-Vitter)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: David Vitter (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SMOR 4/2 52 32 +20
As we saw on Saturday night, the electoral environment is pretty brutal for Democrats in Louisiana right now, and unless I see polling to convince me otherwise, I don't see any reason to conclude that Vitter is anything other than what he seems, which is a fairly popular Republican incumbent in a red state. LA-3's Charlie Melancon, the only remaining Democrat to represent Louisiana in the House, is considered the most credible opponent, but unless he sees himself as a potential victim of redistricting (Louisiana is likely to lose a House seat once the Congress is redrawn in 2012), it would be a lot to ask him to give up his seat.
Probability of Democratic Pickup                  5.0%
27. Maryland (D-Mikulski)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Barbara Mikulski (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 11/2006 57 35 +22
If re-elected, Mikulski would become the longest-serving female senator in history, which might be the extra incentive she needs to steer her away from retirement; Republicans face long odds even if she quits.
85%    Generic R vs Mikulski (D)                    2%
15% Generic R vs Generic D 10%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 3.2%
28. South Carolina (R-DeMint)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Jim DeMint (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 2/19 49 37 +12
Although DeMint's approval ratings are marginal enough to create some wiggle room for a challenge, Democrats have a weak bench in South Carolina.
Probability of Democratic Pickup                  3.0%
29. Washington (D-Murray)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Patty Murray (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Strategic Vision 11/1 55 37 +18
SurveyUSA 10/18 55 35 +20
Murray is fairly entrenched, and Washington isn't really behaving as a swing state of late.
Probability of Republican Pickup                  2.5%
30. Vermont (D-Leahy)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Pat Leahy (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Research 2000 10/2007 67 29 +38
SurveyUSA 11/2006 71 25 +46
There's a small chance that Pat Leahy could retire, in which case Republican Governor Jim Douglas could run. Otherwise, the seat is untouchable.
90%    Generic R vs Leahy                        0.01%
6% Generic R vs Generic D 2%
4% Douglas vs Generic D 40%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 1.7%
31. Alabama (R-Shelby)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Richard Shelby (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 10/18 61 32 +29
The Democrats have some candidates like Arthur Davis that might be compelling in another state, but are highly unlikely to be viable in Alabama, especially against a popular incumbent like Shelby. Shelby could retire, which might give the Dems an outside chance, but likely not more than that.
85%    Generic D vs Shelby (R)                    0.5%
15% Generic D vs Generic R 5%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 1.2%
32. South Dakota (R-Thune)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: John Thune (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Mason-Dixon 10/14 64 34 +30
SurveyUSA 11/2006 61 35 +26
One day, At-Large Representative Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin might take a run at this seat, but she has no reason to do so now while Thune remains highly popular, especially when South Dakota will also have an open governor's seat.
Probability of Democratic Pickup                  1.0%
33. Indiana (D-Bayh)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Evan Bayh (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 2/4 58 32 +26
Bayh generally wins his races by large margins, and with Indiana turning bluer, this cycle is unlikely to break the pattern.
Probability of Republican Pickup                  0.5%
34. Oregon (D-Wyden)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Ron Wyden (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 10/18 54 34 +20
Davis/Hibbitts 12/2007 45 19 +26
Wyden is quite popular; any credible Republican opposition will gravitate toward the governor's seat instead, where Ted Kulongoski will be term-limited.
Probability of Republican Pickup                  0.2%
35. Utah (R-Bennett)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Bob Bennett (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Dan Jones 1/2007 67 18 +49
SurveyUSA 11/2006 58 32 +25
Bennett might retire, in which case the Democrats will find out that Utah is still Utah.
85%    Generic D vs Bennett (R)                  0.01%
15% Generic D vs Generic R 1%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup 0.2%
36. New York (D-Schumer)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Chuck Schumer (D)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
Marist 10/22 55 33 +22
SurveyUSA 10/18 60 31 +29
Quinnipiac 8/2 61 23 +38
As this seat is now protected both by a governor's race and by a second, more vulnerable senate seat, Schumer should face only token opposition.
Probability of Republican Pickup                  0.1%
37. Idaho (R-Crapo)
Approval/Favorability Ratings: Mike Crapo (R)
Poll Date Approve Disapprove Net
SurveyUSA 7/2007 61 26 +35
It's pronounced Cray-poh, so you can take your Larry Craig jokes elsewhere.
Probability of Democratic Pickup                 0.01%

Summary

Even if momentum has swung somewhat against the Democrats by 2010, they remain in a strong position to gain seats in the Senate. They are pretty much locked into reasonably competitive races in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Kentucky, Missouri, North Carolina and New Hampshire, will probably get one in Kansas, and could potentially get one in Iowa and perhaps even Texas or Arizona depending on retirements. By contrast, the only near-certain competitive Democratic seat is in Nevada; beyond that, the Republicans are looking at a series of second- and third-tier races like Colorado and Wisconsin, or races that require a white knight like Arkansas, California, North Dakota and New York. Overall, our guesstimate is that the Democrats will pick up 3-4 Republican seats and the Republicans 1-2 Democratic seats, for a net swing of 1-3 seats for the Democrats, potentially placing them beyond the 60-seat threshold. Democratic gains in the Senate, indeed, are possible or even likely even if they lose ground in the House. Although much of this simply reflects the staggered nature of US Senate seats -- it's Democrats who will have their backs to the wall in 2012 -- there are some deeper implications as well, which we will explore at a later date.

78 comments

phil said...

I suspect you'll see Reid's favorables climb sharply next year if Obama's successful in pushing his agenda through in January. That's the kind of thing that would bring annoyed Democrats home.

Kyle B. said...

I assume you were being ironic when you used the words "educated" and "guesstimate" consecutively.

Better than that, Nate. Better than that.

Bob from Illinois said...

Nate:

Perhaps you could employ some blog variant on the Delphi method to develop consensus probabilites here on some of the key variables. It would be good to see an active dialog on questions like whether Schwarzenegger would be likely to run.

Just a thought.

Keep up the good work.

Alex S. said...

Hey Nate, I wonder how much less likely you made a Chris Matthews-run by your article about his exploration committee ;-). I guess he wanted to keep it secret as long as possible to continue building his image on his show, but now had to face serious pressure to resign and he seems to have abandoned his plans for now. But well, the PA race will be less star-struck, but still one of the most interesting ones of the cycle. I consider it to be a pure toss-up. But I still want to suggest that registration gains don't always mean vote gains. Let's see if the Democrats can carry the Obama wave into 2010.

fred said...

Nate can go to a third party system and overcome mulie.

I like the idea of a blog post on each major variable. Schwarzenegger is a major variable - discussing him and his probabilities separate from the rest is a worthwhile endeavor and outside of election season it makes sense.

There is absolutely no probelm with using educated guesstimate. It expresses the thought perfectly, if you weant Nate to use the Chicago Manual of Style you should be reading the Economist and forget the internet.

Dmitry said...

STATLER IS AN ANNOYING FAGGOT.

Juris said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Juris said...

@Nate: I support the suggestion by Bob from Illinois. You don't want to replace the auction markets but it seems to me that you can draw on the wisdom of the crowds in some other ways (think of Tangotiger's defensive ratings, for example).

The "crowd" can tell you the probability that a given incumbent will retire (or move to some other office). The "crowd" can tell you the probability that certain challengers will run. You could do this for every Senate and House seat. This will give you some consensus 'priors' to use in your forecasting of a seat change.

To do that right, however, you'd have to have a system whereby people couldn't corrupt the estimates with multiple votes. Though perhaps if they voted no more than once per week, you could get updating information that way.

(An added virtue is that this could drive some traffic to your site.)

Stanz's Sidekick said...

I'm wondering, why would Michael Castle only be a coinflip against a Generic D? Given that he already represents Delaware at-large and easily wins re-election there, why would a Senate race as a quasi-incumbent be much different? One reason would be that a Senate seat is more valuable, but that shouldn't make *too* much of a difference?

Sam Cook said...

Thank you for giving me something to do instead of working on this research paper.

Statler N Waldorf said...

Do you really think McCain stands that strong of a chance of losing? I thought Napolitano was his only real threat

shawn said...

Will the 'Don't give Obama 60' issue have any credence by fall 2010, either pro (GOP comes up with a decent message and Obama is seen as getting too much power) or con (GOP is seen as blocking Obama's efforts to save America)?

Actually if Stephen Harper survives and comes up with a decent solution to the problems in Canada the GOP can take an entire playbook from him in 'conservative governing through economic difficulties.'

Pat said...

Hutchison is most certainly NOT a shoe-in to beat Perry in the Texas Republican primary. Perry is best at running for office and has successfully scared off Hutchison twice. Also, Texas has a weak-governor system; our Lt. Gov. wields most of the day-to-day power around the capitol. Unless the Texas governor is a superstar with a famous name (like "Bush") they typically don't accomplish much, or even get much credit for what they do accomplish. I doubt your claim that Hutchison would be a national R star especially with some of her mildly pro-choice views.

And Lincoln is safer than you can imagine. Arkansas may be trending red in presidential elections, but at the state level its overwhelmingly D. There are no statewide R officeholders.

Statler N Waldorf said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Kennyb said...

Nate, I have heard nothing about the possibility of New Hampshire's popular and newly relected Democratic governor, John Lynch, contending for Gregg's seat, but if I do, I'll let you know. It would change the dynamics, although he has a tough budget crisis to work through at present. Shaheen did the same thing, although losing to Sununu in her first go-around in 2002. Lynch similarly refuses to sepnd any political capital as governor, although he just may have a conservative mindset, as opposed to fearing any political backlash. And, of course, he will probably be a shoo-in for reelection in 20l0 if he wants to stay governor.

Cugel said...

The situation will be very different in 2010 than it is now.

1. The nation is in such deep crisis that Congress will have to take a LARGE number of important, and potentially controversial votes.

However those votes turn out, all incumbents are at some risk.

2. If Obama's policies prove popular, then those opposing them will suffer as "obstructionists." That generally causes some problems for the party out of power anyway since the President has the bully-pulpit and can go on TV at any time to denounce opponents as "partisan." Bush only lost this power by misuse. As he became wildly unpopular opposition to his policies carried no stigma, rather than the reverse. But, that's NOT the normal situation and won't be true if Obama is reasonably popular.

3. Missouri - you have probably underestimated the chances of a change-over. Red states are generally TOUGHER for Democrats to win at the Presidential level. Senatorial elections pose less challenge, yet Obama came within a few thousand votes in Missouri.

On the other hand, as we saw in Georgia, AA turnout might not be as great without Obama on the ticket, which would hurt any candidate's chances. But, a November general election is almost always better for turnout than a special election. Some people don't want to have to vote multiple times. That takes real dedication.

4. Colorado -- Salazar isn't wildly popular here, but he hasn't really done anything major to get crosswise with the voters, it's just generic Republican dislike of any Democrat. Colorado Republicans are MUCH more conservative than Independents and Democrats.

Thus, it's a LOT more important for Salazar to craft a moderate "bi-partisan" image that appeals to Independent voters than anything else and he's done that pretty well.

This race would have to be ranked a bit higher if Colorado Republicans had anybody to run against him but they don't.

Former Gov. Bill Owens isn't going to run, and Republicans have nobody else with statewide stature at this point.

They'd have to either run a state Senator or Legislator (with limited name recognition), or else find another billionaire businessman like Pete Coors.

The right-wing businessmen they've tried have all failed miserably, so, they're pretty much down to hoping that some state Senator from Colorado Springs will turn out to be a star (suddenly).

I'd put the chances of that at no more than 10%.

Perhaps, if the economy is in horrible shape in 2010, there'll be some payback.

But, that possibility is hard to assess right now. It would come down to whether people blamed Congressional Democrats for the bad economy or whether they thought that the Democrats were doing everything they could (passing the stimulus package for instance, which should create 2.5 million new jobs by then).

Amber said...

@Pat: Disagree on Hutchinson--Perry got less than 40% of the vote last time around, against a not-compelling career politician, a Democrat, and a comedian, so I really think Hutchinson will wipe the floor with him. He didn't scare her away last time so much as the party told her it was hers in 2010 if she didn't put up a primary fight, and she obliged. But they've got no credibility to try that again, and even if she loses the primary I think she'd be a compelling independent candidate in the general, as her more moderate views will play much better in Harris, Dallas, Travis, and Bexar counties (all of which went Obama).

As for the Senate seat, I'd suggest that Michael Skelly (really good fundraiser and lots of his own money, too) would have a better chance than Edwards. He was up against it in the rich white Houston 'burbs, but his technocratic message, not to mention money, would play better statewide, I think.

Larry Parker said...

Please, no SenaTerminator! I live in what he calles Kah-LEE-forn-EE-uh, and he needs to go. Thank God he was Constitutionally ineligible to become President, or you know that egomaniac would have run, and maybe won.

shma said...

Actually if Stephen Harper survives and comes up with a decent solution to the problems in Canada the GOP can take an entire playbook from him in 'conservative governing through economic difficulties.

You mean they'll whine and scream at the top of their lungs that the democrats are taking power undemocratically and then try and shut down the legislature?
The GOP is already doing the first with their ACORN blathering, and they can effectively accomplish the second with the threat of filibusters. Harper is reading their playbook, not the other way around.


And a question about these senate predictions: if the probabilities of Generic vs Incumbent, Generic vs Generic, etc. are nothing but guesses, then why even bother with the rankings? The rankings could move around significantly with only slight changes in these probabilities.

Mike said...

It would be interesting if the Ohio Democratic Party can convince Jerry Springer to run for the Senate seat in 2010. They've been trying to get him to run for some time now, but he is resistant to give up his show.

Juris said...

If Caroline Kennedy enters the Senate, that could be a draw to her relative-by-marriage Arnold S.

There is a certain attraction of celebrities to politics, and though Arnie can make a lot of money from films he can do more if he keep active politically.

BTW/ you never know, but Obama might appoint him to something after Arnie retires.

wv: litiselo (little village, for those of you who understand the meaning of selo in Russian)

judas_priest said...

One thing that has bothered me about your models is especially relevant here. You are figure chances down to the third significant figure (in this case, tenths of a percent), but the underlying data aren't anywhere precise enough to generate that kind of precision. Given the fuzziness of your "guesstimates" I believe that the lower limit for accuracy is +/- 5% (and it's probably wider than that).

Polls, which sometimes report their results to the third significant figure when they and +/- 3-4% in the second significant figure. It's sort of like estimating the cost of the bailouts at $700,100,000,000 rather than a straight $700 billion, even though we know that we are probably running at +/- $100,000,000,000.

humanist said...

Calculating by eye quickly it seems to me Nate is saying he predicts a 2.086 +D. Obviously it's absurd to try to get this kind of prediction, but on the other hand I think if you bother to be so specific about each and every case it's funny not to come up at the end with a number that sums it all up.

The fundamental point is that Nate believes that inertia alone, even in a Franken-less scenario, should bring in a 60 Senate - barely - in 2010.

Failure to bring in a historical Health Care brakthrough through this first Obama term would be a major setback to the Democratic brand. The Democrats won't let it happen and Universal Health Care shall arrive by 2012.

Zapunar Mckintard said...

litiselo is a village in Lithunia, Juris.

And don't talk so much crapo, Nate!

BlackGriffen said...

You've got a math error on Illinois, Nate:
70% Generic R vs Jackson (D) 30%
30% Generic R vs Generic D 10%
--------------------------------------------------------
Combined Probability of Republican Pickup 15.0%

The error: .7*.3+.3*.1 = .24, not .15. Only reason I was checking is that your explanation of how you calculated the joint probability is lousy. You say, "I then multiply all these numbers together to give you the joint probability," when what you really do is, "I then multiply the rows and then sum up the results to give you..."

Juris said...

@Zapunar: ah yes, with a name like Juris I should have known! Actually, I don't know what the word for village is in Lithuanian or Latvian, but those languages are deeply related to the Slavic languages.

@Judas Priest: I agree with the suggestion that the number of significant figures be reduced in these guestimates.

wv: parbilis (parboiled or parabolic)

Wayward Son said...

For Burr in NC, a lot depends on whether:

1. Mike Easley didn't run against Dole because he thought he couldn't beat her.

2. Mike Easley didn't run against Dole because he wanted to stay focused on NC government rather than spend time on an election.

or 3. Mike Easley didn't run against Dole because he has no interest in being a Senator.

If it's either of the first two, he will probably run in 2010 and beat Burr. If it is the third, he won't run, and most of the 2010 cycle for Dems in NC will be building name recognition for their candidate.

Statler N Waldorf said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Christopher said...

I, too, am optimistic about 2010 for the dems. However, the senate outlook for 2012 is grim, since many of the seats they "stole" in the 2006 sweep will probably swing back.

RufusRules said...

The California GOP is in deep doodoo right now, if this article is correct. Arnold's name in particular is mud as conservatives don't like him on social issues and nobody likes him on on economic issues. Unless he can get his mojo working again before 2010, my guess is he won't even run for Boxer's seat.

E said...

You're missing something in Louisiana. There is some likelihood that David Vitter will face a strong primary opponent. He has a lot of personal enemies in the conservative circles around New Orleans and a number of sexual rumors dogging him (in addition to the confirmed scandal in DC).

Already there are rumblings that someone in the GOP is looking to attract a former sex worker to be a primary opponent for Vitter.

The other possible options for the Dem opponent (though you're right that Melancon is the top choice) are Mitch Landrieu, Don Cazayoux, and Jim Harlan.

dbmcgaw said...

Nate - under the Maryland senate race, you said: "Combined Probability of Democratic Pickup" on Mikulsky's seat. I'm sure you meant "Combined Probability of Republican Pickup."

crapo said...

'a former sex worker', E? Not me, I hope.

Kennyb said...

Another take, same topic:

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002994197

"GOP Has a More Level Playing Field in 2010 Senate Races Filibuster-Proof?"

Mule Rider said...

Nate Silver,

You can keep trying to silence me all you want. I'll just keep coming back, you asshole.

And if worse comes to worse, I'll come to Chicago, find your ass, and beat you to a bloody pulp.

Don't underestimate me! I'll take you down a notch, you whiny liberal bitch.

phil said...

Christopher said...
I, too, am optimistic about 2010 for the dems. However, the senate outlook for 2012 is grim, since many of the seats they "stole" in the 2006 sweep will probably swing back.


Which ones? The close ones in 2006 were McCaskill, Whitehouse, Webb, Brown, and Tester. Whitehouse's safe for life, Brown's probably safe, and the others don't seem particularly vulnerable.

It's four years out, which is an eternity in politics, but there's no reason to think those seats are likely to flip back, especially with an incumbent Obama on the ballot again.

Ian Monroe said...

I think Nate is overestimating the significance of the gains in voter registration on a midterm election.

debeus said...

About the UT race; I know it's unlikely, but perhaps you should consider the chance that Bennett will retire and Jim Matheson will decide to run for the seat. It's unlikely that Matheson would give up his House seat, and even if he did, he still probably wouldn't win, but I think the chances are higher for him than for "Generic (D)"

Pinyan said...

"Missouri is not quite the swing state it once was."

Really? They just elected a Dem governor, the presidential race was decided by less than a point, and in 2006, we put McCaskill in the Senate.

WV: I think you undst the chance that Kit Bond will lose in 2010.

joel said...

Can`t think of a senate seat the dems won in 2006 that is in serious danger. McCaskill is pretty popular, Tester is doing a good job and is not a flaming liberal,Webb is not the most popular but he is an incumbent in the new democratic Virginia.
Brownis doing a good job. Once a senator becomes an incumbent it`s hard to get rid of them. I guess a lot is going to involve Obama if he is popular he will have long coattails but I expect the republicans to wander in the desert for a long time as long as they are the party of the white man and stay anti minority and immmigrant.
By the way I read that Matthews has re-signed with MSNBC so the whole senator thing was a distraction at best, still Spector may be in serious trouble especially in a primary.

markymark said...

A few quick thoughts,

1 Why would Giuliani not run against Schumer instead of Kennedy or Cuomo?

2 I think its a bit early to confidently make such predictions, but I do think that the GOP will fight a formidable campaign especially to oppose a 60 strong Dem Senate. I'd expect right now the Dems to end up with 55 seats in the senate at most from this distance, in 2011.

3 That being said I think that 2010's mid terms will be a huge referendum on the Obama Presidency, more than almost any other mid terms in recent history (possibly 2006 not withstanding).

Wayward Son said...

And 2012 will again be an Obama year of high AA turnout and GOTV perfection. Incumbency + interested base will be powerful weapons for the Democrats, regardless of the reddish tilt to some of the states.

hiyayaywhopee said...

As far as future posts go, I'd really like to see something about the Virginia governor's race next year, which right now is looking really, really open.

Buckeye said...

2 to 4 years are an eternity. Who would of thought Caroline Kennedy would run for political office? What if she does a good job as senator in New York? You would fall out of your seat today if someone said there will be a President Kennedy in 2017. I doubt that would happen, but so much time out things drastically changes these days.

Tom said...

Kansas #1? I know Sebelius is popular, but it's still Kansas. Even popular governors of the "wrong" party don't have a good record in Senate races. The only one of recent vintage that I can think of is Ben Nelson, and it took him two tries to get elected to the Senate.

In Louisiana, I wonder if Joseph Cao will challenge Vitter in the primary -- it's not like he has anything to lose (any Democrat not under federal indictment will beat him in LA-02 in 2010.)

mcc said...

Nate, I'd be curious to see this kind of analysis applied to the California governor's race. Do you plan to do a 2010 governors' rankings or anything of the sort?

Redshift said...

...and McCain may find he has less interest in the banalities of the Senate after spending the better part of a year away from the chamber.

He's never had much interest in the banalities of the Senate -- his attendance record has been terrible for years. Now, if can't get his pals in the press back to worshipping him after his vicious presidential campaign, then he might decide it's not fun any more.

Redshift said...

As far as future posts go, I'd really like to see something about the Virginia governor's race next year, which right now is looking really, really open.

Hear, hear!

Redshift said...

I think Nate is overestimating the significance of the gains in voter registration on a midterm election.

I don't. It's not just voter registration, it's voter identification. Typically, presidential campaigns don't get around to sharing much of the voter data they collect, but that's one of the things that was different about the Obama campaign -- it was well-integrated with the state party structure, and the data are flowing back. Sure, only a certain percentage of people vote in non-presidential campaigns, but it's an advantage to be deriving that percentage from a bigger base.

DrJubal said...

Bob Bennett confirmed over the weekend that he WILL run for re-election in 2010.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=5005953

Shaun Martin said...

Adding up the various percentages (and we all know it's early) implies that the Democrats can expect to pick up roughly 2 net seats in 2010 [expected swing to Dems of 3.6 seats and to Reps of 1.5 seats], which means there'd be a filibuster-proof Senate.

We'll see if it happens.

Alex said...

Nate - if you think the odds of a Democratic pickup in Idaho are 0.01%, you are overly optimistic. The odds of a Democratic pickup in Idaho are zero.

Secor314 said...

Nate,

Barack Obama not being on the North Carolina ballot in 2010 might not matter as much as you think. Kay Hagan outpolled both Bev Perdue and Barack Obama last month.

WaywardSon, I just don't think Mike Easley is the most popular statewide Democrat down here. He's about to leave office with a multibillion dollar deficit, the way his government has run the mental health care system is a joke, his wife has a very fishy contract with NC State, and the road project between Durham and Raleigh that required a complete repave didn't go over well.

Roy Cooper, who managed to fix the Mike Nifong mess in the Duke lacrosse investigation, would be my guess at the statewide Dem with the best chance to beat Burr. I have heard Heath Shuler has an interest in leaving the 11th District House seat to run for Senate as well.

Kaiguy said...

Looking at this data from a Utahn's perspective, there's one scenario that seems (vaguely) possible.

Jim Matheson is a very popular Representative - however, in 2010 there will be a census, and Utah will pick up at least one (maybe two) seats in the House. The republican legislature in Utah will divide Matheson's semi-liberal district yet again, and hope to gerrymander him out of the House.

This gives Matheson a possible incentive to run for the Senate seat, esp. if Bennett retires. I'm not saying the seat will switch, it just seems like the only scenario where it would.

Lastly though, senate run or no, the impending redistricting would seem to suggest that Matheson is going to start tacking right quickly.

Tarr said...

Your conditional probabilities are off in Illinois.

My long-term predictions:

2010: small Democratic gain in the Senate, bringing them to 60+, as Nate predicts. Small Republican gains in the House.

2012: the Obama effect holds off what would otherwise be a poor Democratic performance. Incumbents win the day, although Lieberman loses in a primary.

2014: Republicans make significant gains in both chambers.

David said...

Nate said: You should not regard the numbers as being especially precise or meaningful; they are ballpark estimates, a codification of my subjective knowledge.
Why, then, are you reporting numbers with such precision? Saying that the republicans have an 11.3% chance of picking up a California senate seat when 11.3 is just the output of an equation whose inputs are all ballpark estimates is terribly misleading.

Long Island Democrat said...

Nate,

You indicate in the comments that Jackson would be more vulnerable than other choices. But then you give a generic R 30% chance against generic D but only a 10% against others.

Perhaps the math error BlackGriffen referred to wasn't a math error at all, but a typographical error caused by you switching the probabilities.

Michael said...

As a New Yorker, I doubt that Giuliani has a 40% chance of winning a statewide election against a generic Democrat. He was a very divisive mayor who, though being given credit by loads of people for lowering crime, was hated by lots of New Yorkers until 9/11. I think you'll find that lots of New Yorkers are, on balance, glad he was Mayor at the time but consider him an asshole and won't vote for him for any other office. 2001 is receding ever further into memory, but Giuliani ran a terrible, hard-right campaign for President this year. In addition, a layer of sleaze has gathered around him since his Mayoralty, given the legal troubles of the unaccountably not vetted Bernard Kerik, and the fact that Giuliani moved official documents from his terms of office through a private foundation just before he left office (look here) adds to a general aura of shadiness that also encompasses his personal life. Add to everything else the fact that New York State is turning bluer, given the changeover of the State Senate. I'd give Giuliani maybe 30% against a generic Democrat. He could "win" a debate but be so much of an asshole that people vote against him.

Drew said...

I'd give him even less than that Michael. The Democrats would have to put up an absolutely horrendous candidate for Giuliani to have any realistic shot at taking this seat. It is almost unbelievable how a man who is generally considered to have been a fairly successful Mayor can be so reviled at the same time. I don't remember the last time I heard something positive said about Giuliani here in NY by any friend, family member, or acquaintance (cab drivers, college classmates, etc). Remember, this guy was ranked #1 on the list of 50 Most Loathsome New Yorkers in 2004.

chathamh said...
This post has been removed by the author.
chathamh said...

Considering your penchant for nuance and complexity, I'm surprised you engaged the Kansas question so simply.

The past two gubernatorial elections were Democratic victories, but they were surprisingly uncompetitive because the Republicans ran two candidates in the general election, a moderate and a conservative. If it happens again, which is always a possibility because the base is still conservative and the state gov. establishment is still moderate, I think the generic Democrat (Dennis Moore, anyone? Parkinson is not the only viable possibility) has a realistic chance.

In the Senate, the Republicans could also split. Both Jerry Moran and Todd Tiahrt, the likely primary competitors, have built-in advantages. Moran has a massive district, so he has more recognition throughout the state, but Tiahrt has Wichita (the biggest city in the state) and an impressively influential legislative history. If after one of the two wins, the other runs against him in the general election, Sebelius will almost assuredly win. If not, I think it will be a very competitive race, and I can't wait to contribute.

James said...

As a Washingtonian, I speak from experience when I say Patty Murray is totally safe. Though Republicans have a rising star in Attorney General Rob McKenna, he will probably seek the Governor's seat at some point as his predecessors have done.

nkpolitics1279 said...

Safe Seats
Alabama-(Shelby-R) if Shelby runs again.
Connecticut(Dodd-D)
Delaware(OPEN-Kaufman-D).
Georgia(Isakson-R)
Hawaii(Inouye-D)-if Inouye runs again.
Idaho(Crapo-R)
Indiana(Bayh-D)
Iowa(Grassley-R)-If Grassley runs again.
Maryland(Mikulski-D)If Mikulski runs again.
New York(Schumer-D)
North Dakota(Dorgan-D)
Oregon(Wyden-D)
Utah(Bennett-R)-if Bennett runs again.
Vermont(Leahy-D)-

Likely Incumbent
Alaska(Murkowski-R)
Arizona(McCain-R)if McCain is the GOP nominee.
Arkansas(Lincoln-D)
California(Boxer-D)
Colorado(Salazar-D)
Illinios(VACANT-Obama)
New York(VACANT-Clinton)
Oklahoma(Coburn-R)
South Carolina(DeMint-R)
South Dakota(Thune-R)
Utah(if Bennett retires-R)
Washington(Murray-D)
Wisconsin(Feingold-D)

Leans Incumbent
Alabama(if Shelby-R retires)
Florida(Bush-R vs Generic DEM)
Hawaii(if Inouye-D retires)
Kansas(Generic DEM vs Generic REP)
Louisiana(Vitter-R)
Nevada(Reid-D)
New Hampshire(Gregg-R)

Tossup.
Florida(Bush-R vs Sink-D)
Kansas(Moran-R vs Sebelius-D)
Missouri if (Bond-R)runs again.
North Carolina(Burr-R)
Ohio if (Voinovich-R)runs again.
Pennsylvania if (Specter-R)runs again.

Leans Takeover
Arizona(OPEN Seat)
Florida(Sink-D vs Generic REP)
Iowa(OPEN Seat)
Kansas(Sebelius-D vs Tiahrt-R)
Kentucky(Bunning-R)
Missouri(OPEN Seat)
Ohio(OPEN Seat)
Pennsylvania(OPEN Seat)

KY should be ranked number 1.
Bunning should be the most vulnerable incumbent looking at his narrow victories in 1998 and 2004 and his old age and extreme ideology. A Bunning's lose is similar to Santorum(extreme ideology), Burns(Old),and Allen(Controversial).
NC (Burr's vulnerablility is due to the anger of the General GOP party)- A Burr's lose is similar to

judas_priest said...

@juris

The linkage between the Baltic languages (esp. Latvian and Lithuanian) and Slavic, while there, are very weak. The two groups probably diverged more than 3000 years ago and they are almost certainly not mutually intelligible. Even Latvian (also called Lettish) and Lithuanian are not mutally intelligible.

My father's family came to this country from Latvia, having lived in what was then Libau and is now called Liepaja. They were, however, not ethnically Lettish. My great-uncle's brother-in-law, who was a member of the first Latvian parliament in 1919, survived WWII and the Holocaust and became a member of the first Israeli Knesset. Interesting historical distinction.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltic_language

wv=mershyca
a kingdom in some sci-fi/fantasy trilogy.

djl said...

The problem for the Dems when it comes to the Voinovich seat is who they run.

Ted Strickland makes a ton of sense, but does he want to give up the governor's mansion to head back to Washington? (Given the economy in Ohio and the crushing layoffs to come, maybe he does.) Jerry Springer has zero chance whatsoever of winning. Tim Ryan and Michael Coleman have very little statewide name recognition.

The Ohio Dems' best hope (apart from Strickland) seems to be to run a generic Democrat (Ryan?) and hope the "D" next to his name gets the job done.

Michael said...

Drew posted:

"Remember, this guy [Giuliani] was ranked #1 on the list of 50 Most Loathsome New Yorkers in 2004."

I didn't know that. In what publication?

rebmoti said...

Re Kansas: Moran is no shoo in to get the GOP nomination, as walking haircut and RWNJ Todd Tiahrt has announced he wants it as well. My guess is that Moran will be the one to lose this game of chicken, but even if it goes to a primary, a little Republican bloodletting would not hurt Sebelius' chance of getting the seat.

Statler N Waldorf said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Ickey said...

I'd like to see the math on the following additions to the chart:
PA - Rendell and Matthews as specific challengers
OH - Kucinich being in the primary mix for the Dem nomination
KY - Lunsford trying again
MO - Gephardt will be the Dem nominee since he's the only high-up Dem not in the cabinet
NC - Easley will run against Burr (also not offered a cabinet post)
IA - Bump up the Grassley retirement %. I was with him on election night 2006 - he got his grandson into the IA state leg, but he was very bummed out about being in a minority. If it starts to look like another Dem year int he Senate, he'll anounce he's not running again. Vilsack will be the Dem nominee as he bowed out of the prez race after talking with Clinton and Obama - before the IA Caucus, even. No cabinet post for him, either, not even vetted by either of the two. Not even for Ag Sec? Must mean they convinced him to run in 2010. Braley is not commenting, but would most likely fall in line if Vilsack announced, from what I know from talking to him recently.
NH - Lynch may run?
CO - Figure Schaeffer if the GOP nom
IL - This state needs a whole new re-figuring after the Blago crap is figured out
TX - Hutchison may yet decide to run for prez in 2012, so I'd leave this state out of scrutiny for now
AZ - McCain is not retiring unless he dies, so bump up his %
NY - Paterson may make a different decision due to IL going haywire. Any chance he'll parachute himself over to Senate and put Cuomo into the Gov's mansion through some shuffling? Just wondering.
OK - I see no reason for a Henry/Coburn matchup to not happen. Whom else can the Dems run?
WI - No way Ryan gives up in an environment where any vacant seat can be snatched up by the Dem money/volunteer machine.
HI - More interesting is whom do the Dems nominate to take over post-Lingle?
AK - Tony Knowles again?
GA - Martin can beat Isakson, easy
LA - Vitter should quit and have his seat handed to Kennedy by Jindal, no reason not to parachute
VT - what chance Dean wants his old job back and is quitting the DNC now to do just that? Doesn't that keep Douglas home in the Gov race, thereby freeing Leahy?
SD - Add Daschle as a possibility
14 vulnerable republicans by my count to 2 vulnerable Dems - IL, CO
Dems may gain 7-8 and GOP may gain 0-1, making a 2/3rds supermajority possible. Not in the House, but at least in the Senate. That should be their goal, anyway. (Assuming an eventual Franken win in MN.)
-Jeff

politicaljam said...

I appreciated the detail that you put into these rankings. I'm still not completely finished reviewing them, but it was definitely thought-provoking material to read.

Sebelius would be a great voice for the Mountain West/Plain states, and I'm particularly biased because of her Ohio roots. When my dreams of an Edwards presidency had not been shattered, I hoped to see her as a potential VP choice.

As an Ohio Democrat, I am not completely against Voinivich as a U.S. Senator. While I do not always agree with all of his positions, he has been quite admirable in his positions on the war and care of the troops. If I had to pick a dream candidate to run against him it would be Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Youngstown/Warren.) I think that Portman and Dewine would have a greater chance of running for governor against an incumbent Strickland (but I'd rather see Ted win a 2nd term!)

可是你喔q said...

520聊天室
一夜情聊天室
一夜情貼圖區
一夜聊天室
一葉晴貼圖區
一葉晴貼影片區
丁字褲女優
丁字褲美女寫真
丁字褲美女影片
人之初貼圖區
八國聯軍情色網
八國聯軍論壇
十七歲女孩貼影區
又又處女貼影區
下載a片
上班族聊天室
大老婆俱樂部
大波霸美女影片
大眾論壇
女同志聊天室
女郎俱樂部
女郎貼影區
女狼俱樂部
女學生內衣照
女優天堂貼圖
女優王國
女優盒子
女優貼片
女優貼圖
女優電影
女優寫真
女優影片
小老婆俱樂部
小老鼠論壇
小弟弟情色網
小弟弟貼圖區
小弟弟貼影片
小弟弟貼影片區
小弟弟貼影片網
小弟弟貼影區
小弟弟影片
小杜情色網
小妹妹貼影區
小高聊天室
小說論壇
小賤人貼影區
小瓢蟲情色論壇
小瓢蟲論壇
小護士偷拍網
小魔女自拍天堂貼圖區
小魔女自拍貼圖區
小魔女免費影片
小魔女貼圖區
小魔女貼影片
不色不進貼影區
不穿內衣
中部人聊天室
內衣秀
內衣模特兒
內衣模特兒寫真
內衣褲
天天情色
天天幹貼圖區
天天網遊論壇
天天論壇
天生名模貼圖區
天堂私服論壇
天堂情色
天堂情色網
夫妻聯誼俱樂部
少女內衣
手工內衣
日本av女優
日本av女優免費影片區
日本a片
日本女優
日本內衣
日本正妹
日本正妹照片
日本正妹影片
日本美女
日本美女圖庫
日本美女寫真集
日本偷拍
日本情色女優
日本辣美女優
日本模特兒寫真
日本學生妹
月光論壇
月宮俱樂部
月宮貼圖區
比基尼
比基尼女郎
比基尼內衣
比基尼泳裝
比基尼泳裝外拍
比基尼泳裝美女
比基尼泳裝美女的影片
比基尼泳裝美少女圖片
比基尼美女
比基尼美女的奶
比基尼辣妹
比基尼辣妹照片區
比基尼辣妹圖片
比基尼辣妹影片
比基尼線
水美眉
北部人聊天室
卡通aa片
卡通aa片免費看
卡通a片
卡通a片免費看
卡通美女遊戲
卡通貼圖區
可愛美眉
只有貼圖區
台中人聊天室
台中聊天室
台論論壇
台灣 kiss 倩色網貼圖區
台灣 kiss 情網貼圖區
台灣av女優
台灣a片
台灣a片王
台灣kiss情色文學
台灣kiss情色文學區
台灣kiss情色網
台灣女優
台灣自拍偷拍
台灣客棧電影貼圖區
台灣美女
台灣美女 kiss 情網貼圖區
台灣美女貼圖
台灣美女貼圖區
台灣美女電影
台灣美女圖
台灣美女寫真貼圖區
台灣香腸俱樂部
台灣偷拍
台灣情色
台灣情色貼圖
台灣情色網
台灣情色網綜合論壇
台灣情色論壇
台灣無限貼圖區
台灣貼圖區
台灣賓館偷拍
台灣論壇
台灣論壇女生遊戲
台灣論壇好玩遊戲區
台灣論壇遊戲區
巨乳女優
巨乳美女
布蘭妮貼圖區
平面模特兒
打工正妹
本土a片
本土女優
本土偷拍
正妹大學
正妹大學宅男社
正妹日報
正妹地圖
正妹百人斬
正妹自拍
正妹空姐寫真
正妹星球
正妹相簿
正妹美食地圖
正妹無名
正妹無名相簿
正妹無名相簿分享
正妹照片
正妹圖
正妹圖片
正妹圖片或照片
正妹網
正妹裸照
正妹影片
正妹餐廳
正妹牆
交友啦咧聊天室
交友聊天室
交友貼影區
伊莉論壇
同志聊天
同志聊天室
同志貼圖區
名模露點
成人a片
成人偷拍
成人情色
成人情色小說
成人情色文學
成人情色貼圖
成人情色貼圖區
成人聊天室
成人貼圖區
成人影片
成人影城
成人影音
成人影音城
成人論壇
有閒俱樂部
百分百貼圖區
米克情色網
米克綜合論壇
自拍a片
自拍偷拍
自拍偷拍成人影片
自拍偷拍貼圖
自拍偷拍貼圖區

egapre said...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,潤滑液,自慰套,威而柔,威而柔,威而柔,威而柔,自慰套,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套,潤滑液,威而柔,FleshLight,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,跳蛋,按摩棒,FleshLight,充氣娃娃,情趣商品,情趣網站,情趣網站,潤滑液,性感內衣,充氣娃娃,按摩棒,情趣精品,跳蛋,情趣網站,情趣商品,跳蛋,FleshLight,充氣娃娃,情趣內衣,情趣精品,按摩棒,威而柔,自慰套,成人玩具,Nexus,lelo,聰明球,後庭,後庭g點,g點,美國fleshlight,STU訓練大師,Fleshgirls,Toys Heart,Tenga,日本 Vibratex,日本Toys Heart ,日本Tenga,美國aneros,rudeboy,英國rudeboy,英國Rocksoff,德國Fun Factory,Fun Factory,英國甜筒造型按摩座,甜筒造型按摩座,英國Rock Chic ,瑞典 Lelo ,英國Emotional Bliss,英國 E.B,荷蘭 Natural Contours,荷蘭 N C,美國 OhMiBod,美國 OMB,Naughti Nano ,音樂按摩棒,ipod按摩棒,美國 The Screaming O,美國TSO,美國TOPCO,美國Doc Johnson,美國CA Exotic,美國CEN,美國Nasstoy,美國Tonguejoy,英國Je Joue,美國Pipe Dream,美國California Exotic,美國NassToys,美國Vibropod,美國Penthouse,仿真按摩棒,矽膠按摩棒,猛男倒模,真人倒模,仿真倒模,PJUR,Zestra,適趣液,穿戴套具,日本NPG,雙頭龍,FANCARNAL,日本NIPPORI,日本GEL,日本Aqua Style,美國WET,費洛蒙,費洛蒙香水,仿真名器,av女優,打炮,做愛,性愛,口交,吹喇叭,肛交,魔女訓練大師,無線跳蛋,有線跳蛋,震動棒,震動保險套,震動套,TOY-情趣用品,情趣用品網,情趣購物網,成人用品網,情趣用品討論,成人購物網,鎖精套,鎖精環,持久環,持久套,拉珠,逼真按摩棒,名器,超名器,逼真老二,電動自慰,自慰,打手槍,仿真女郎,SM道具,SM,性感內褲,仿真按摩棒,pornograph,hunter系列,h動畫,成人動畫,成人卡通,情色動畫,情色卡通,色情動畫,色情卡通,無修正,禁斷,人妻,極悪調教,姦淫,近親相姦,顏射,盜攝,偷拍,本土自拍,素人自拍,公園露出,街道露出,野外露出,誘姦,迷姦,輪姦,凌辱,痴漢,痴女,素人娘,中出,巨乳,調教,潮吹,av,a片,成人影片,成人影音,線上影片,成人光碟,成人無碼,成人dvd,情色影音,情色影片,情色dvd,情色光碟,航空版,薄碼,色情dvd,色情影音,色情光碟,線上A片,免費A片,A片下載,成人電影,色情電影,TOKYO HOT,SKY ANGEL,一本道,SOD,S1,ALICE JAPAN,皇冠系列,老虎系列,東京熱,亞熱,武士系列,新潮館,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,整型,水噹噹,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,珠海,下川島,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,婚友,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友,交友,交友,婚友社,婚友社,婚友社,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,越南新娘,外籍新娘,外籍新娘,台中坐月子中心,搬家公司,搬家,搬家,搬家公司,線上客服,網頁設計,線上客服,網頁設計,網頁設計,土地貸款,免費資源,電腦教學,wordpress,人工植牙,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,

徵信社robin said...

徵信社, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 外遇沖開, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信

徵信, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 徵信,徵信網, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, , 徵信公司, , , , , , , 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, , , , 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, , , , , 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信公司, , , , 徵信, 徵信社, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

平平 said...

^^ nice blog!! ^@^

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,

徵信, 外遇, 離婚, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 征信, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,

平平 said...

^^ very nice

徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,

徵信 said...

外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇
外遇


外遇 外遇
外遇
外遇 外遇外遇
外遇

外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 ,
外遇 外遇 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇外遇 外遇外遇 外遇 外遇

外遇 外遇

外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇 , 外遇劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿劈腿喜帖囍帖卡片外遇外遇 外遇 外遇外遇 外遇
外遇 外遇 外遇 外遇剖析 外遇調查 外遇案例 外遇諮詢 偷情 第三者外遇話題 外遇發洩 感情挽回 徵信社 外遇心態 外遇 通姦 通姦罪 外遇徵信社徵信社外遇 外遇 抓姦徵信協會徵信公司 包二奶 徵信社 徵信 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信社 徵信 徵信 婚姻 婚前徵信 前科 個人資料 外遇 第三者 徵信社 偵探社 抓姦 偵探社 偵探社婚 偵探社 偵探社偵探家事服務家事服務家電維修家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務家事服務持久持久持久持久持久持久持久離婚網頁設計徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社外遇離婚協議書劈腿持久持久持久持久持久劈腿剖析徵信徵信社外遇外遇外遇外遇徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信徵信社徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社徵信社

酒店上班請找艾葳 said...

艾葳酒店經紀公司提供專業的酒店經紀, 飯局小姐,領檯人員,領台,傳播妹,或者想要到台北酒店林森北路酒店,私人招待所,或者八大行業酒店PT,酒店公關,酒店兼職,想去酒店上班, 日式酒店,制服酒店,ktv酒店,禮服店,整天穿得水水漂漂的禮服酒店,鋼琴酒吧酒店領檯,酒店小姐,公關小姐??,還是想去制服店上班小姐,水水們如果想要擁有打工工作、晚上兼差工作兼差打工假日兼職兼職工作學生兼差兼差打工兼差日領工作晚上兼差工作酒店工作酒店上班酒店打工兼職兼差兼差工作酒店上班等,想了解酒店相關工作特種行業內容,想找打工假日兼職兼差打工、或晚班兼職想擁有快速賺錢又有保障的工作嗎???又可以現領請找專業又有保障的艾葳酒店經紀公司!

艾葳酒店經紀是合法的公司工作環境高雅時尚,無業績壓力,無脫秀無喝酒壓力,高層次會員制客源,工作輕鬆,可日領現領
一般的酒店經紀只會在水水們第一次上班和領薪水時出現而已,對水水們的上班安全一點保障都沒有!艾葳酒店經紀公司的水水們上班時全程媽咪作陪,不需擔心!只提供最優質的酒店打工,酒店上班,酒店打工環境、上班條件給水水們。

水水們妳有缺現金、有卡債缺錢卡奴的煩腦嗎?想到日本留學日本打工嗎?妳是工讀生找工作??想要擁有高時薪又輕鬆的夜間兼職工作,打工機會和,假日打工,兼職工作日領假日打工的機會嗎??想實現夢想卻又缺錢沒錢嗎!??整天還在煩腦如何賺錢有什麼賺錢方法,和賺錢最快方法!?,想要打工,日領工作,短期打工,兼差工作,打工兼差工作嗎!?,
請加入我們艾葳酒店經紀公司工作單純輕鬆”高時薪”又可日領徵想要當傳播妹,上班小姐,酒店兼差,酒店兼職,歡迎學生打工,!!!
加入我們實現夢想就從現在開始^__^

freefun0616 said...

酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,

,