“It was drizzling and mysterious at the beginning of our journey. I could see that it was all going to be one big saga of the mist. ‘Whooee!’ yelled Dean. ‘Here we go!’ And he hunched over the wheel and gunned her; he was back in his element, everybody could see that. We were all delighted, we all realized we were leaving confusion and nonsense behind and performing our one and noble function of the time, move. And we moved!”
– Jack Kerouac, “On the Road”
Five Thirty Eight is headed for the open road. We may have built a reputation for the numbers, but don’t be fooled: there is poetry in our souls. We are in the middle of an epic election, and for the final eight weeks we’ll be bringing you not only an intense daily polling menu, but also the story of the battleground states’ ground game.
You deserve that – you love this country just as much as we do, so consider it the least we could offer. At the end of this important day of remembrance, in the starry-dark Reno bare-mountain night, we’re officially posting notice of our series to come.
The story of the organizer and volunteer effort is one that needs to be told. It was much underreported in 2004 just how potently the Bush ground campaign organized. Say what you want about his governance – and we all have – but his competitive fire was lit for the election race. Republicans turned their voters out. Who’s got more heart this time? Missouri boys say: Show-Me.
This year, all available evidence suggests the Obama campaign is doing something unprecedented with its organizing efforts. Is it this: 29’2.5”?
Is it Mexico City, 1968? The story seems to be hiding in plain sight. The effort is more reported than the Bush 2004 effort, but it is still underreported. More significantly, it is under-contextualized. Pollsters have to guess about turnout, and often they revert to more conservative estimates because their past modeling of likely voters suggests that’s correct. Besides, if ground games are equally effective, they should cancel each other out. There's an understandable bias against believing something and modeling it until it is proven. It's why big enthusiasm and GOTV can make up ground against a fully accurate poll of voter preference.
Just what is organizing? How does it work? What are the nuts and bolts? And why is it something a site primarily (but not exclusively) known for its polling analysis would want to cover as closely as possible?
And is the McCain campaign being given short shrift? Is it being taken too lightly? And what kind of galvanizing effect did the Palin addition offer the Republican base? This is not a one-sided story.
And it all deserves to be told in real time. We're tempted to do a photo series of the floors of organizers’ rooms, but we think organizer moms and dads would freak out. There ain’t no lipstick on that pig, we can assure you (and once had our own crazy-stupid organizer floor mess).
Here is the tentative list of battleground areas we’re attempting to cover, in approximate order and subject to change: Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Nebraska’s 2d, Iowa, Missouri, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida. We’d love to get to ‘em all but, baby, we’re just a man.
And like the Temptations, we ain’t too proud to beg. Organizers, volunteers, candidate supporters along the way with their hospitality, absolutely (and bipartisan), but especially information. We want your stories, your inside scoops, and frankly, we want you to teach us what’s going on in your area on the ground. How is the national campaign interacting with the local grassroots groups? How are the downballot candidates coordinating with the presidential race effort? What’s different about this year than past years? And nineteen other questions not listed here. Tell us, o ye hockey moms: pocket99s at gmail dot com.
Here’s a note to the staff organizers we’ll meet along the way, for both sides. What you do is epic. This is not something people get into for money. The hours are absurd. The health toll is often obscene. The number of demands coming at you from all directions is often overwhelming. And we are not out there to get you folks in trouble. Talking to the press at the field level is verboten, for message control. We know. We respect. There is a built-in limit to what can be reported, a lot of it will come from savvy and observant volunteers. Paid field staff cannot even comment on blogs, which is one great secret as to why the general public hears so little about organizing. Yet it is the foundation of our democracy – people sacrificing themselves for something they believe in, something for America, this country that we love. Even when we don’t share your political views, we respect your direct action.
Finally, an appeal to all Americans, regardless of voting age or partisan bent: do something tangible. It is now or never. Fifty-four days. Do something that will make the face you see in the mirror on November 5 proud. Push yourself. Suck it up. Work for it. Make a sacrifice you would not otherwise make. Leave the confusion and nonsense behind and perform your one and only noble function of the time – move.
And now… to the road!
We are back in our element. Everybody could see that.
9.12.2008
On the Road: Battleground States of America
by Sean Quinn @ 2:24 AM...see also battleground states, on the road, organizing
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

663 comments
Stop,
It was a hypothetical situation, I am only calling into question what would happen if McCain doesn't get what he wants from the congress. He's been known to have a mean temper and keep political grudges and anyone in the Senate for the last few years can attest to that.
sts-
It's a double entendre. One of the Dept of Int employees was in bed (literally) with an oil-industry lobbyist.
It's funny watching all the RepubliCon trolls void of facts. Here's the synopsis.
Post Convention Obama is ahead in every Kerry State --252 EC Votes
MI:Obama +5 and +4 and pre RNC/DNC +4
NH:Obama +6 now and pre RNC/DNC +1
IA:Obama is ahead(7 EC Votes)
CO:Obama is ahead ((9 EC Votes)
NM: Obama is ahead (5 EC Votes)
That's game set and match without OH,FL,VA.NC.IN, etc...
The reality is the same post convention and pre convention.
If you want to waste money in OR and WA go ahead. For example, OR now has a 212K dem registration advantage and OR had a 86% voter turnout in 2004. Not a chance in hell Repub win OR or WA. Bothe have high voter turnout and Dem's have voter reg advantage.
You can pontificate all you want on every tick in the national polls. State polls matter and the math is the same as it's been for months. McCain needs to run the table. Btw,in the you might want to research the 2.5million new registered Dem voters while Repubs lost 344,000. That isn;t in your LV polls. New voters turned out at 75% rate in primaries if it even approaches 30% Dems when going away as the states that they have pushed are the important states.CO,IA,NV,PA,Fl,NM, OH too name a few.
Norske, well said for a koolaid drinker without an actual rebuttal to the likely divided government and moderate policies if McCain wins and the Dems hold Congress. :)
Mason, nope...I know my sister and her friends were horrified at the mention of any sex ed for their kindergardeners, felt like that was both too early and that they would do it if necessary.
This is the South so i could be wrong...metro suburban Atlanta
I have a nine=year old....
I do all the teaching along with my wife. We don't need to waste some of the precious 180 days of the school year on talking about the naughty parts when they should be taught how to read and other more conventional stuff that the US has to compete with other countries over.
Jeez, don't you guys realize that the stuff in this bill is the parent's responsibility to tell their kids about when they see fit to do so?
The drilling scandal has been buried due to the 9/11 memorials and Ike, but something tells me as more details come out it'll blow up to a bigger story. Americans love a good sex scandal.
About the Congressional Ballot. Mr. Newport of Gallup refused to mention this fact:
AMONG LIKELY VOTERS:
REPUBLICANS: 50%
DEMOCRATS: 45%
Could the GOP take back some seats from the worst congress in history!!!!
Link: http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o244/race42008/CongressII.gif
@Realistxxx, @Axmxz, @Mason,
I repeat. Political Ads are not , by their nature fair. See IN IRAQ FOR 100 YEARS.
But you are saying they are lies. and that you "know" what was in the thinking of the McCain campaign, As @Geoff indicates, reasonable people can disagree.
More Importantly, I would be more than happy to go to independents and moderates and discuss exactly what control Parents shoudl have over what their 5 year old children are taught. Usually, middle America want this type of education to come from the parents, rather than a progressive set of lawmakers,
I LIKE the ad you suggest against McCain on this. I am trying to be fair -- this is not a good topic for Obama to be discussing,
All I can say is I'd rather drill for our oil here, than let others do the drilling for us. Regardless of who drills, we'll be using the same amount of oil. It might as well be us doing the drilling.
Jeez, don't you guys realize that the stuff in this bill is the parent's responsibility to tell their kids about when they see fit to do so?
Not implying anything, but don't you guys realize that 30-40% of reported sexual abuse is perpetrated by a family member, and that the median age is nine? 20% are abused before they are eight.
OTF: You have done well to present the best possible view of the present set of polling from a pro-Obama point of view. A few quick points:
1. Colorado is still in the post-DNC phase. Let's wait a bit to see if Colorado reverts to the 04 numbers or close to them once that fades.
2. PA was not on your list, and MI was downplayed. There's a poll out showing a one point MI Cainer lead, and PA polls consistently show a 2-3 point Obama lead, down from 5-8 pre conventions. Cainer is pouring tons of money (most anywhere in the country) into PA, and soon will start in MI. The game is hardly over in those states. OH is trending to Cainer and looks out of reach for Obama.
3. Obama's new daily message of economy and McCain's out of touch is his bet best to win, and if he avoids more gaffes, I think he's got the inside track this moment.
4. Intangibles could make all of the above unknown - McCain health issue flareup, Al-Queda tape (remember 04), New Scandal either way (lots out there on both that's not public) or a VP flap either way.
5. Keep in mind its two on one right now - Biden is a nonentity besides issuing gaffes like Barack might have screwed up picking me because Hillary would have been a better pick.
I want my happy numbers and I want them NOW. I don't think you should go anywhere until we get this thing under control.
floridagop: that's why don't like complaining about "fair" or "unfair" - all is fair if you can fool the electorate with it. Bush won fairly - he took advantage of popular stupidity and compalcency. If Obama can't win by showing the people what a disaster the last 8 years have been *and* tying McCain to that disaster, well, he's gonna lose ain't he?
I pesonally don't think Obama is as much of a liberal pansy people keep fearing/hoping him to be. Remember, this is the dude who won his state senate seat by disqualifying his opponent. He is much tougher and street-smarter than people give him credit.
CTSTW,
They have a shot at some of the seats that the Democrats shouldn't have won under normal circumstances in 2006, like the Mark Foley and Tom Delay seats. The Mississippi and Louisiana special election seats might change back, too.
Other than that, the Democrats are pretty close to their ceiling in the House, but most projections have them gaining several:
http://www.electionprojection.com/house08.shtml
The numbers by otf for new registered voters must also consider where they registered and why. The higher registrations are taking place in younger states like CO, NM, VA, and NV.
In CO, over 100,000 new registrants are under 35.
In NM, 22,000, in NV, 55,000, and in VA, it's 110,000. Source: Swampland, Time.
Stop,
The education in question was supposed to be voluntary and parents could pull their kids out the day the topic was supposed to be covered.
I think most good parents will teach these sorts of things to their kids, but lets be honest, not every parent is going to be so prepared. My parents told me that they were relieved that school taught me about sex ed because it was so damned embarrassing for them.
It's the old give me a pinch of your freedom to make sure a large amount of people are safer argument. I know it rubs a lot of people wrong but I don't think it's a bad plan in certain places like Urban areas.
Gallup is trending back towards Obama slowly now, but Ras has a big jump for McCain, these polls really are still all over the place. I wonder if the cause of this is a very mixed. polarising response to Palin, making a national poll very difficult to be really representative of the nation as a whole right now? This is impossible to read right now. Probably a slight edge today for McCain, but maybe trending back in Obama's direction? Ras admitted its poll losta good day of polling for Obama and swapped it for a good day of polling for McCain, but oh my word this is a tough thing to read.
I still want Obama to come out with a more positive campaign. I thnk thats what has gone wrong recently. Ignore everything else and make the campaign about his vision for America. He does that and I believe he wins.
Maybe the Republicans will take back the Congress!
The SURGE is working! =)
I know it rubs a lot of people wrong but I don't think it's a bad plan in certain places like Urban areas.
Where kids don't have parents to give them "The Talk(s)"
BTW... There is a positive correlation between sexual abuse and Drug/Alcohol abuse, pre-mature promiscuity, and violent crime including abuse. Breaking the cycle is important.
By the way I wonder if the congressional polls tightening, possibly tipping in the GOP direction might help Obama.
Some people have suggested that if McCain wins he can't do that much damage as congress will be Democratic. I wonder if that idea gets taken down, some independents might back off being happy to let McCain in.
chun,
As long as the sex ed thing is pro-choice for the parents to say yeah or nay. I think its fine.
I just don't want government forcing their way into a place that I think the parents should have sole control of.
Surge-GOP RIGHT, DEMS WRONG
Drilling-GOP RIGHT, DEMS WRONG
National Security-GOP RIGHT, DEMS WRONG
DEMS RULE OF CONGRESS: 9% APPROVAL
Time for Change!
GOP 2008!!!
Good point marky.
It's not a surge, it's a bubble.
For anyone taking the Rass Washington state poll seriously, the same poll has their republican gubernatorial challenger surging 10points in 30 days to a big lead over the incumbent dem Governor Gregoire. The exact same 10 points as McCain has supposedly surged and cut Obama's lead to 2. It's crap.
GOP 2008!
Surge AHEAD with real Conservative values and take out Pelosi, Reid, and Obama!
Landslide!
markymark,
he can't do that much "damage"?
Personally, I want him elected to keep congress from running ruffshot over the nation as a whole with their misguided policies.
Also, McCain pledged to have Roberts-like appointings to the supreme court. That's also important to me because I don't want a justice up there making up new interpretations to our constitution, George Orwell style, like Stevens or Ginsburg like to.
I just don't want government forcing their way into a place that I think the parents should have sole control of.
That's why the ad was so egregious. There was parental choice in the matter. The state of IL said, "We're going to do this, but if you don't want your kid to be a part, that's cool."
I mean... it's like a set of parents getting bent out of shape because all the other kids are going on a field trip, and they refused to sign the permission slip for their kid.
Charles,
That Palin as Milli Vanilli really pisses me off. I've been preparing my Palin as Sanjaya thesis and this totally takes the steam out of it.
Charles comparison was sexist.
Peggy Noonan must read this blog. She has the most rabid of our GOP posters nailed so precisely:
This race is not over. Everyone I know thinks it is, but I don't buy it. Mr. Obama just suffered a catastrophe, his first. Mr. McCain just enjoyed a triumph, maybe not his last. GOP strategists are experiencing premature triumphalism; they're puffing up like blowfish, emitting great bubbles of self-regard. Democrats, be encouraged by this! They make mistakes when they're winning. They always start to think they're the reason.
If Mccain loses (and I believe he will) it will be because millions of people like Greg are unable to control their goading, jabbing, immature boastfulness... and centrist independents are repelled by it.
GOP strategists are experiencing premature triumphalism; they're puffing up like blowfish, emitting great bubbles of self-regard.
INDEED.
Interesting new offshore drilling numbers out
69 for 19 against
On August 21, 62/27
Those registration numbers I cited above all happened before the end of July. Certainly, Senator McCain can count on some of these new registrants to vote for him. But every cross tab I've seen by age averages to a 58 to 42 percent advantage for Senator Obama. If that spread holds in Colorado, and consider there have been only 100K new registrations in January to June 08, it's a net gain of at least 16,000 votes for Obama in Colorado. President Bush won Colorado by 4.5% and 100,000 votes. Consider the at least 16K net new votes Obama is likely to get with the fact that Senator McCain has not led in any Colorado poll by more than 3 points, and I draw a lot less noise out of the race there.
Now, I said the word "if" once, and I acknowledge that. Therefore, if you have a fact-based, numerical point to raise that refutes my model, I'd be happy to hear it.
AMERICA IS SICK OF THE UN-DEMOCRATIC DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS.
Pelosi-Reid need to hit the road for denying something 70% of AMERICANS WANT!!!
OFFSHORE DRILLING!!!!
Hysterical Filly hehe
So true, so true. Karma is a bitch, Obama is finding that out right now with his "im already the President" european tour.
Mason,
I think you are right about that ad, and an accumulating amount of ads. McCain can do better than he is right now on ads. Obama isn't innocent on this either. The 5 million dollar talk, and the 7 houses issue are a bunch of crap too.
I am growing a bit antsy with the stupid ads on McCain's side. He's at his best when he is answering Obama's ads.
Do you or do you not WANT their votes??
If you want their votes, it's time to stop attacking their intelligence or values!
McCain went all the way to Alaska to get them lipstick, it's not what they need but hell, at least he's pandering, he cares about getting into their good books.
And maybe when they declare Obama "snobbish", they don't mean "uppity" in a racist manner but a perception of the Dems' attitude towards them, an ugly condescension and contempt. God knows I've been at the receiving end of said contempt and abuse, all for daring to raise questions about the way Obama's campaign is unfolding. No doubt this post will again attract the STFU posters. And no, Schadenfreude is not a dish I relish but I did say so.
The key to the election is not to do a volte-face about gay marriage or FISA, this shameless level of grovelling can never be matched by lipstick. Instead, Obama has to reprise the themes, Change Washington, Fix the Finacial Katrina, Bring the Troops home, Bring back Jobs, etc. that got us all excited in the first place. The Voters are facing PROBLEMS. If they're not convinced by either politician, they'd at least vote on the one who's "likeable enough". I voted for the politics, not the man, so I never drank the Kool Aid. Bring back the stadium rallies with the grandmas and the laid-off middle-aged guys in baseball caps. Connect with Americans again, lots and lots of Americans. Remember that was when he had some 320 EVs in the bag.
The "Shallow Celebrity" attacks were planned to get him to change his approach, and his campaign, like the Pavlov dog, did! Attacked him on foreign policy and he picked an old "experienced" VP with the charisma of a pile of shredded cardboard. Then what did McCain do? Got himself a Miss Alaska to steal Obama's message and thunder, whose grasp of foreign policy is limited to peering over the ice cap at Siberia.
All the while, Obama was cheered on by the Base who could see no wrong and broach no dissent.
Get back into the spotlight. Bask in the Love. Don't let Palin hog it.
What will Obama do with his personal Presidential Seal after he loses? Will it go to the same Hollywood lot as the styrofoam Greek Columns? ROFL!!!
You know what's odd? both candidates have nearly identical energy policies. One emphasizes drilling and talks vaguely about renewable energy and the other emphasizes renewable energy over drilling, but in the end the goal and the method of energy independence is the same.
The only reason this is an issue is because Dems want to make oil industries look like the devil (not that I am saying they aren't) and the Repubs want to make the Dems look like cowards about drilling (at this point I think environmentalists should take a back seat for a few more years).
Isn't it sad that we all have a plan that we can agree with but no one wants to celebrate that fact?
Personally, I feel that Obama will better educate and motivate Americans about driving plug-in hybrids and uniting together to be free of foreign oil but I'm sure someone out there will tell me why I am mistaken.
That presidential seal was a disasterously stupid idea. WTF.
I agree with that Chun, from a centrist point of view it is disasterous that we aren't doing something now that both parties presently support.
Here's the rub: The Dems are loading their bill with poison pills that will stall drilling for years and years to placate the environmentalists. Conversely, McCain can't get anyone else in the GOP hardly to support anything more than tax breaks for renewables, and even that is tough going.
However, pouring government money into renewables might take the space of the private sector. Indeed, with oil prices above 100 and likely to stay up above 80, the MARKET is responding with renewables companies booming. Dumping a ton of government money won't necessarily spur any faster development and might alter the trajectory of the market negatively.
Further, taxing "windfall profits" at a 100% rate (Obama's plan) of oil companies (who also are the major suppliers of natural gas) would surely retard the production market strongly, offsetting any even negligible benefit from the limited Dem drilling plan.
So where are you then? Dumping money into renewables while oil keeps going up with no end in sight. Unless oil is stabilized for 10-15 years, the economy will eventually collapse under high energy prices when those prices truly filter into the economy with significantly higher inflation.
Geoff,
1) Pre convention Obama lead in CO in 13 of 17 polls.
2)PA has 1,1110,000 Dem voter registration advantage up from 580,000 in 2004. Those new registered voters aren't in the LV polls. If even 25% show up McCain loses the state by more than Bush. Even without them Obama would win the state
MI was Obama +4 (Rasmussen since that's the Repubs favorite and has a house effect for them) and is +5 Ras afterwards. Zero movement towards McCain.
Does anyone know of a good book on the future of the US health care system?
"This race is not over. Everyone I know thinks it is, but I don't buy it. Mr. Obama just suffered a catastrophe, his first. Mr. McCain just enjoyed a triumph, maybe not his last. GOP strategists are experiencing premature triumphalism; they're puffing up like blowfish, emitting great bubbles of self-regard. Democrats, be encouraged by this! They make mistakes when they're winning. They always start to think they're the reason."
Wasn't the shoe on the other foot right up till the realization that McCain's gains cannot be explained away as a Convention bounce?
That presidential seal was a disasterously stupid idea.
Nah... It's didn't move numbers much, if at all, and it was in the middle of the summer.
OTOH- I can now mute JSM's Tiergarten ad within two seconds of it coming on.
Wasn't the shoe on the other foot right up till the realization that McCain's gains cannot be explained away as a Convention bounce?
You can't make that call until the week between the 15th and the 21st. Once we get to that point, we'll begin to know where we are. Until then, we MAY still be in convention-bounce-land.
China will just normalize aggressive euthanasia tactics and save trillions. What will the US do?
I'm all for drilling but we all know it's a drop in the bucket at this point.
I think there will be a a period of 5-10 years where we are going to be hurting over energy prices. Sucks to be us but we just didn't have the forethought to do anything about it earlier. (Sigh, sometimes I dream of the utopia Gore would have brought us).
Switching all our semis and public transportation to CNG could help in a big way, I just wonder if Congress can have the balls to make that into law.
I didn't mean stupid as in it cost him a ton of votes, I just think it's tacky and nothing good could have come from it.
@Mason,
>>>>>That's why the ad was so egregious. There was parental choice in the matter. The state of IL said, "We're going to do this, but if you don't want your kid to be a part, that's cool."
I mean... it's like a set of parents getting bent out of shape because all the other kids are going on a field trip, and they refused to sign the permission slip for their kid.<<<<<
I will try to end here. This topic is like kryptonite for Obama -- do not touch it -- ignore it. Moderates, Independents, and Republican are incensed about school boards and legislators who know better what to teach their kids.
I started this thread when Scott indicated that he could not see how any McCain supporter could support this Ad. That is my job on this blog!!!! I have learned much about the sensitivity about community organizer or the gaffe of Bush Doctrine because my life experience is not progressive. Whenever an Obama supporter want to know how a topic is viewed in the moderate republican world, I and others can contribute.
Having said that, I do not particularly like Sarah Palin, She is too socially conservative for my taste. That does not mean that I do not understand what attracts voters to her.
However, pouring government money into renewables might take the space of the private sector. Indeed, with oil prices above 100 and likely to stay up above 80, the MARKET is responding with renewables companies booming. Dumping a ton of government money won't necessarily spur any faster development and might alter the trajectory of the market negatively.
Geoff, I have to disagree with this. There is no way that research grants, consumer tax breaks, or corporate tax breaks for renewable energy will crowd out the market. Most reseach grants in the sciences already come from the government and the second and the third items will only expand the number of players in the market. You are correct that the market is responding, but money, even government money, is a fine catalyst for any market's growth.
Dems don't indulge in juvenile taunting and triumphalism as much as Reps do.
Of course, that could be because they lose so often and are grimly focused on winning this time.
I get the impression (if one can make such a huge generalization) that righties view this election as a chess match or a sporting contest. Lefties look on it as a bitter life-or-death struggle.
Flagop
I will try to end here. This topic is like kryptonite for Obama -- do not touch it -- ignore it. Moderates, Independents, and Republican are incensed about school boards and legislators who know better what to teach their kids.
You can't magnimoniusly choose to end the debate when you aren't even listening in the first place. The IL legislature gave parents the choice to say, "I know better than you do." If you don't accept that base fact, than there's really nothing more to say. :-/
Mason,
I;d be overwhelmed with relief if it were so, but I suspect the Republican Convention didn't do that much for the base, Palin did. It's a Palin surge, not so discernible in the intial VP choice polls as she was an unknown then and pollsters got a tepid response from people who did not know her then.
Elsewhere, it's really helpful to hear from the Republicans who are leaning Democrat this election, like Floridagop.
And it *is* a bitter life-or-death struggle...too bad that more people aren't seeing it that way. I'm not crazy about Obama, I loathe some of his supporters, but I'll do my part to end this past 8 years of continuous nightmare.
@Mason,
I accept the base fact -- So did the author of the link I provided, which is link from RCP. There is a McCain side and an Obama side , I read both.
I was actually interested in Obama when he first came out. WHY -- He is going to be post-racial. He is going to be post partisan. He is going to reach out to moderates, independents, republicans. He is going to reach across the aisle. He agreed to take federal campaign funding if his republican opponent agreed the same. He will run a clean campaign and be a different kind of politician.
I thought it meant that when he attacks lobbyists, in addition to big business, oil, and financial institutions, he would also attack the unions and the lawyers.
I thought it meant that he would change his policies and go to the middle ground on hot button issues like energy, abortion, taxes, supreme court justices, healthcare, etc. How can Obama attract Republicans if he does not get off his most liberal positions. On Supreme court judges, he could commit in no uncertain terms not to nominate anyone who could not get the votes of 25% of Republican Senators.
I thought that he would speak to power against late night comedians like Jimmy Kimmel and Bill Maher, hollywood elites, DailyKos. What would it cost him to condemn the nasty fringes of his own party?
There is a lot more I would want from a truly great candidate. Truly, I would like far more from John McCain on these line BUT McCain did not promise to be post partisan. Obama did.
@ Michael
Indiana does not charge for non-driver ID's, which is why the Supreme Court upheld the law.
What they don't tell you is that they require a birth certificate to get the ID, something many people simply cannot afford to do.
Great post!!!
Excellent post.
I live in Vienna, Austria. Next week I'm heading to my hometown in Northern California to join Obama volunteers travelling to Nevada. That's about 6,000 miles I'm going, or thereabouts. Hope to run in to some of you out there.
I will pass on any observations relevant to your project. I, too, am wondering what effect these supporters will have on the Nevada margin, and look forward to getting a feel for the facts on the ground.
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,
^^ nice blog!! ^@^
徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇
徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,
徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,
徵信, 外遇, 離婚, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 征信, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,
^^ very nice
徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,
徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,
Post a Comment