Note: Over the course of the next two months, we will be previewing the Presidential Election matchup in each of the 50 states. The previews are built around a key set of demographic variables in each state. We continue with the Tar Heel State, North Carolina.
A CONTRAST OF CORES, North Carolina is a proving ground for Barack Obama’s big bet on strategy. Based on recent history, North Carolina should be a Republican state in the presidential column again this year. However, polling data already projects a significantly closer race than during the two Bush elections, a reality that North Carolina Republicans openly acknowledge. Throughout the summer, we’ve projected an approximately five point John McCain win. However, if Obama can somehow take North Carolina and its 15 electoral votes, not only will he likely win the election, it will vindicate the grunt-work organizing approach to campaigning as opposed to the astroturf-ish select-a-veep electoral addition theory (see: John Edwards, 2004).
If McCain can keep his base fired up, North Carolina should remain Republican. Since LBJ famously lost the South for Dems by signing the Civil Rights Act, only once – the southern Dem Carter/Watergate year of 1976 – has North Carolina voted Democratic at the presidential level. However, a quickly growing population and burgeoning Research Triangle base continually teases Democratic hopes. It’s this Democratic strength among core groups of white liberals (that a state like Mississippi doesn’t have) that makes North Carolina seem more attainable. To win the state, Dems have to maximize all their edges and the Republicans have to be just unenthusiastic enough to allow Dems to catch them off-guard.
Key Demographics
Note: Factors colored in red can generally be thought to help McCain. Factors in blue can generally be thought to help Obama. Factors in purple have ambiguous effects. Except where otherwise apparent, the numbers next to each variable represent the proportion out of each 100 residents in each state who fall into that category. Fundraising numbers reflect dollars raised in the 2008 campaign cycle per eligible voter in each state. Figures for seniors and youth voters are proportions of all residents aged 18+, rather than all residents of any age. The figure for education reflects the average number of years of completed schooling for all adults aged 25+. The figure for same-sex households reflects the number of same-sex partner households as a proportion of all households in the state. The liberal-conservative index is scaled from 0 (conservative) to 100 (liberal), based on a Likert score of voter self-identification in 2004 exit polls. The turnout rates reflect eligible voters only. Unemployment rates are current as of June 2008.
What McCain Has Going For Him
Demographically, McCain’s success depends in some significant way on his ability to fire up religious conservatives, Appalachian voters and military-base-supporting towns. North Carolina is a top-20% white evangelical state and a very low-percentage Catholic state, two factors we notice track with better Republican performance. With its significant jutting into Appalachia, “American” ancestry also scores highly relative to other states. Those are the areas where Hillary Clinton dominated Obama in the primaries, the ridged-and-valleyed enclaves naturally resistant to new movement and openness to outsiders.
The comfortable Bush margin and conservativeness of even many Democrats will also help McCain here. North Carolina has some military towns that one would expect to see McCain use as a campaign-stop backdrop at least once or twice. Again, provided turnout is at least normal, this built-in ideological and partisan edge should be enough to hold off a furious charge by Obama.
What Obama Has Going For Him
High African-American population that Obama hopes to register and turn out at record numbers. If pollsters misjudge black turnout on the low end when they weight their likely voter models, Obama could surprise, and his organization suggests that's precisely what he's aiming for. (When FiveThirtyEight nailed the North Carolina primary result but pollsters missed it, one major factor in success or failure depended on demographic assumptions in AA turnout.) Per the NYT, Obama holds the same 150-to-12 paid staff edge reported in Missouri. North Carolina also has some heavily concentrated Hispanic towns that make for more efficient organizing efforts. As in most states, Obama leads McCain in per capita fundraising. Northern retirees settling along the coast and in the mountains are subtly moving the demographics in Obama’s direction, and the academic and high-tech job transplants in the Research Triangle are the big targets for new voter registration and persuasion. Obama’s affinity for basketball in this hoops-crazed state probably doesn’t hurt either.
Overall, the demographic game plan isn’t very complicated here. To win, Obama has to maximize turnout among his core voters. Massive registration effort has been underway for some time and the numbers were already rolling in during the primary season and early summer before most of the paid organizing boots were on the ground. Early voting will be a key feature of the plan to win, and a two-plus week window starting in mid-October will clearly help Obama’s better-organized group.
What To Watch For
Keep an eye on the excellent NC State Board of Elections site, which updates voter registration by party daily. Also keep an eye on late-October reports about early voting turnout. We’ve suggested that 5% is probably the outside edge of ground game bump measured against accurate polling of voter preference, and North Carolina has been straddling our Battleground/Penumbra States 5% line for the summer months.
There’s also a potentially very competitive Senate race here as Democrats try to reach the filibuster-proof 60, with Kay Hagan (D) challenging Elizabeth Dole (R) for the old Jesse Helms seat. While Dole still leads (and is projected by roughly the same margin as McCain), recent polls show her lead softening. Dole has had trouble keeping her popularity high, and the DSCC will certainly pour money into the race.
Also watch to see how much racial politics plays into local advertising and whether any further trial balloons are sent up here. This spring McCain had to reject and denounce a state Republican Party ad tying Obama to Jeremiah Wright as "degrad(ing) our civics." We'll see whether that stance holds, as McCain's campaign says Wright is now fair game. Though voter attitudes toward race in North Carolina have certainly shifted with time and the new demographic influx, this was the site of the infamous “Hands” ad that helped Jesse Helms scare voters that a would-be black Senator would make sure blacks got jobs over whites. The more dogwhistling you see, the closer the internal polls probably show the race.
Finally, check how often Obama visits the state. Having spent time there this week, he is certainly acting like a candidate making a significant play for those 15 EVs. However, this is pre-convention. Watch to see what happens after the convention in the closing days to get a feel for where those internal polls put the race in the Tarheel State.
8.22.2008
Road to 270: North Carolina
by Sean Quinn @ 4:55 PM...see also north carolina, road to 270
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

63 comments
I'm working with the campaign on the ground in Raleigh, and I think we're in play. It'll be an uphill climb, but I think we've got a real chance here. North Carolina's been trending more purple these last few years.
Hopefully McCain picks Mitt to knock down some of that 25% of Evangelical vote!
Nate & Dave - Could you fill us in on NC registration, when is the cutoff? Also how does early voting and or mail-in balloting work and how heavily has it been utilized in past elections?
Thanks Glenn
I'm rooting for Romney as the Republican VP nominee. Slick Mitt would kill them in the South.
North Carolina is still one of the stronger Republican states around. For all the talk about the 'New South' the region is very heavily Republican and the demographic shifts going on there aren't happening overnight. Obama will lose NC by at least 10 and the Democrats will waste more money on a hopeless senate race.
We’ve suggested that 5% is probably the outside edge of ground game bump measured against accurate polling of voter preference
Could someone explain what this sentence means. 5% of what?
Interesting, it really does look like NC is in play.
I wanna know what idiotic thing McCain can do in North Carolina to alienate the state:
Ohio- "Lets allow a merger that'll kill thousands of jobs!"
Nevada- "Let's put lots of nuclear waste there...but not let it travel through Arizona!"
Colorado- "Let's steal their water!"
I'm waiting for him to declare that high school basketball should require helmets (to kill Indiana) and picking a Mormon president to kill North Carolina. McCain is exactly the kind of churlish bastard who would try to lose 50-0 if he didn't want to be President but was pressured into running.
What's that?
Never mind...
jon b.
This means that if you're within 5% on November 3rd, then the "get out the vote" might be enough to swing the state to your side. If you're over 5% on the day before the election, it's over.
North Carolina seems very much to me like, along with Virginia, a model of the newest New South. A strong state university system and growing modern urban areas, combined with a significantly black underclass population starts to create a sort of southern state that's very different from Alabama, Mississippi, or South Carolina.
I don't know if North Carolina is moving in this direction fast enough for Obama to take it in 2008, but I see it as one of the best long term opportunities for the Democrats, to say nothing of it just being an exciting development in terms of a state's development and evolution.
Glenn--voter registration cutoff is (if I remember correctly) Oct 10. Then, from Oct 16 - Oct 31, we have early voting. You can actually register onsite for early voting, but not on Nov 4, oddly enough. I believe this is the first year we're doing it here, but it was pretty huge in the primary, and I don't see any reason to think we won't have a lot of early voters in the general.
North Carolina is to Obama, as Pennsylvania is to McCain; they're both down about 5 points there.
Neither candidate would expect to win the state in a very close election, but it's worth investing in (moreso for Obama, who has more money) because it's winnable in the event of a solid 4-6% national popular vote margin.
I disagree
Obama victories in these states
NC
IN
MO
MT
are all indications of landslides
Victories in these states
VA
NV
OH
CO
are indicators of good ground work
Sorry, my bad. We had it in 2004 as well, but it's been expanded to a lot more sites this time out.
North Carolina seems very much to me like, along with Virginia, a model of the newest New South. A strong state university system and growing modern urban areas, combined with a significantly black underclass population starts to create a sort of southern state that's very different from Alabama, Mississippi, or South Carolina.
It's not static, that's certainly true. Look at the demographics and at recent results however and it's quite clear the change you speak of is aways off.
NC had early voting in '04, but it was new, and largely wasted. But I'm sure Team Obama will use it to the max.
Early voting in NC is not "absentee with a wink" -- no lame excuses are needed at all whatsoever. You just go to the elections office and vote.
Obviously it lets the volunteer escort the newly registered voters to the polling place. then if there's a problem -- a wrong address, a name spelled wrong, any wicked and hellish voter suppression and election fraud from the Repubs -- you have time to deal with the problem. Your first time voter gets to do the thing without worrying about an impatient line behind her.
So Early Voting will multiply the advantage of the side that is better organized, has better and more up-to-date lists and canvassing info, and has more volunteers. It will limit the disadvantage of the side with more first-time voters and low-info voters. And it takes the worry out of a bad weather forecast for Election Day.
If the better ground game can give one side a 5% advantage in other states, it will give our side 6%, 8%, or maybe even a 10% advantage in North Carolina because of Early Voting.
Just a what if thought. How would the national race be changed if North Carolina had gone ahead with their plan last year to change to the Maine/Nebraska system of allocating Electorial Votes? Last year the North Carolina Legislature had the votes to change to the Maine/Nebraska system and the Govenor indicated he would sign the bill until at the last minute Howard Dean stepped in and asked the dems to kill the Bill (He did not want the precident set with Republicans trying to get a simular Ballot initiative on the ballot in California). Obama would have picked up at least 4 or 5 EV's
FWIW I think it's fair that all the states use the same system, still as a Dem I can't help but think how nice those EV's would look in Obama's coloumn
That's funny. CNN is saying its Walter Mondale. Look right here....http://cnn.com/vp_shocker_its_walt
Yiannis has it just right. I might add FL to the ground game list but many would say no ground game can overcome FL reptilian fraud, Sarasota from 06 comes to mind.
Jonathan has a little more partisan dissing than facts. If you rank the 29 states that Bush won in 2004, NC was his 21st best showing, a 12% margin. The idea that Obama would lose by a 10% margin seems to ignore two important facts. Obama is very popular with blacks, (for a long time now the smartest voter group in America). Secondly, Obama is trying a lot harder than Kerry in NC.
FWIW Zogby has a new bunch of state online polls out. No suprise that they are all over the map. Better than nothing I guess (But not much better).
http://www.zogby.com/50state/
"FWIW Zogby has a new bunch of state online polls out. No suprise that they are all over the map. Better than nothing I guess (But not much better).
http://www.zogby.com/50state/"
Zogby gives polling a bad name.
DRUDGE
KMBC's Micheal Mahoney reports a company in Kansas City, which specializes in political literature, has been printing Obama-Bayh material... MORE... Gill Studios, would not confirm information about the material. They would not deny it either. At least three sources close to the plant's operations reported the Obama-Bayh material was being produced...
First, it's not Bayh.
Second, McCain has a record of taking on tobacco lobbies... this also may hurt him (relative to Bush) in NC.
Anyway, it's in play for now, but at long odds.
Lol at Zogby:
Obama up 3 in VA, 8 in NC, 5 in OH, 2 in MO, 6 in CO.
I hope these get the same completely irrelevant weightings the last set did.
Didn't Obama just cut off funding for advertising in NC and other states or was that just a rumor?
DRUDGE REPORTS OBAMA/BAYH BUMPER STICKERS PRINTED IN KANSAS
James,
It was reported on Fox but the list included VA, so I'd mark that as highly dubious.
adam,
Zogby is a terrible, terrible pollster. These latest polls are just more evidence to show it.
Did anyone else see the story that's just making the rounds that some company near Indy is printing up Obama/Bayh stickers?
Yeah you're probably right but, some may disagree with me, Fox doesn't just pull things out of thin air. But I highly doubt he'd quit advertising in VA
Yiannis and johnnyc...
Beat you guys to it! Despite what realistxxx says!
JohnNYC said...
Did anyone else see the story that's just making the rounds that some company near Indy is printing up Obama/Bayh stickers?
------
I bet they have made bumper stickers, signs etc. for a number of the fron-runners.
I may still be Bahy, but I doubt this rumor is confirmation.
I made a diary at Kos, they yelled at me that it's debunked by NBC...
I don't know what it means yet and how different this is from elections past, but based on the NC State Board of Elections website, from 6/28/08 to 8/16/08, total voter registrations in NC increased by 99,493, 46,474 of which were Democrats and 45,808 were unaffiliated, leaving only 7,211 (or 7.2%) new Republican registrants. Thoughts?
I live in Alexandria, VA, and as of today, Obama still has ads up.
What mule rider doesn't seem to understand is that black’s vote their economic interest and a lot of dumb whites don't. Reality based behavior, not ego. Go on mule rider, vote rich and live poor, better not get sick though. It’s a wimpy thing to wrap up your ego in being better than others because you’re white. Decriminalize drugs, spend those extra prison dollars on schools, and then see what happens.
Mule rider may also not understand how important capital is in our capitalist system. Make good on the debt of 40 acres and a mule with interest and then you can put down this group for not getting rich.
Finally mule rider, you lie, regular viewer of your numerous posts know your ass is way too big to possibly allow you to roll around. It’s absolutely impossible for you to laugh it off. Good thing for you since it is the center of your being.
Nate,
NC Voter ID has changed drastically since 2004. Latest data from NC board of elections as of July 2008 is 45 Dems and 33 Republican. 2008 it's now +12 Dems compared to +1 Repub in 2004.
I'm seeing a tremendous amount of excitement and energy for Obama in Raleigh, and practically nothing for McCain. When I've ventured out to do canvassing in more rural areas, I'd say it's been about 40% strong McCain support, 20% strong Obama support, and 40% undecided/apathetic.
Jonathan has a little more partisan dissing than facts. If you rank the 29 states that Bush won in 2004, NC was his 21st best showing, a 12% margin. The idea that Obama would lose by a 10% margin seems to ignore two important facts. Obama is very popular with blacks, (for a long time now the smartest voter group in America). Secondly, Obama is trying a lot harder than Kerry in NC.
You can't make unfavorable demographics go away. You can talk about the ground game and unleashing massive turnout all you want, but that will do nothing to change the fact that the fundamentals of the state are still strongly Republican. Black turnout is perfectly solid to begin with, the idea that Obama will be able to ride to victory with it was rather simply disproven by the primary (yes, he needed to win by more than 14 to have a real shot, when the electorate is 34% black and you only win by 14% that is not good as the % of black voters will be lopped in half for the general).
Also, "partisan"? No need to impugn your fellow Democrats that way.
Those bumper stickers need time to be designed and produced. It´s very unlikely that they knew about it and the whole press didnt, because at least until Obama called the refused contenders yesterday evening, there were just a handful of people knowing about the decision.
Maybe the Obama campaign wants to save money during the convention week...I heard that they stopped the ads because of something related to the convention... maybe they also mean that they wont run negative ads during the good-times-convention.
@ North Carolina: I doubt there is a way for Obama to win there without also winning in Virginia, and thus, NC is a bit meaningless. The senate race could be very interesting though, and maybe NC will be the Virginia of 2012.
realistxxx said: I doubt this rumor is confirmation.
I thought the same thing (about multiples). That's why I asked...but if it's true...remember you heard it here first!
:)
that bumper sticker looks nothing like an Obama one. They are not going to abandon 2 years of branding and put a star on it to make it look like McCain's. That is the sure tell.
2. I have no sources on this except the fact that they need to pull ads to rotate new ones because of the convention. They don't want ads running once the conventions tarts that are not the same exact message and that have the new Obama/X on the tag line
Dave said...
I'm seeing a tremendous amount of excitement and energy for Obama in Raleigh, and practically nothing for McCain. When I've ventured out to do canvassing in more rural areas, I'd say it's been about 40% strong McCain support, 20% strong Obama support, and 40% undecided/apathetic.
------------
Cool, Dave, thanks. In the rural areas it looks like you've identified your 1's, 2's and 3's. Make sure the 1's register and vote early, keep trying to persuade the 2's to become 1's and slash the tires of the 3's on election day (I kid, I kid).
If it's Bayh I'm taking credit for breaking it to 538. I want some sort of 538 t-shirt or something Nate.
Well, the reports today seem to highlight the Obama/Clinton split. Clinton told reporters today that she never said she would accept a VP offer, so speculation that it might be her was inappropriate. The Politico report ("Dem insider")claimed she was never asked for concern she might not say yes. Wow! I think the Clinton VP talk finally died today.
If it's not Bayh, you can probably get an Obama-Bayh bumper sticker pretty cheap.
I dunno, the main problem I see here is...
The two main candidates for Veep are Biden and Bayh. They each have a son named Beau. So why haven't seen any headlines like:
"Both Beau Bayh and Beau Biden Bide for Belated Barnstorming"?
Jonathan, I apologies, sorry my mistake, I should not have assumed you were pegging the margin at 10% because you wished Obama bad results. I'll say two things. I agree that Obama will not win NC unless their is a landslide caused by a tsunami. I wish he would spend his money and time/visits on the real swing states. But I don't think NC will be 10 points plus off his national winning margin. Tell Texas turns blue, be well.
Folks...this excitement thing based on signs and bumber stickers and volunteers is confirmation bias on your part. I live in TN and Obama is down between 15-25 pts here. Obama bumber stickers outnumber McCain 5 to 1. Same with yardsigns. Obama will not win a single Southern state. Look at RCP 2004 during the summer. Some polls had Bush only up by 3-5 in NC in July and August. ARG poll was Bush up 5 in September and Research 2000 had Bush up 3 in August. NC will be solid McCain by late Oct. Keep on dreaming about NC, and the GOP can keep on dreaming about MN.
Jonathan, I apologies, sorry my mistake, I should not have assumed you were pegging the margin at 10% because you wished Obama bad results. I'll say two things. I agree that Obama will not win NC unless their is a landslide caused by a tsunami. I wish he would spend his money and time/visits on the real swing states. But I don't think NC will be 10 points plus off his national winning margin. Tell Texas turns blue, be well
No problem. Even though I am now strongly in Obama's camp I was a loyal Clinton supporter so I still have a tendency to criticize Obama harshly out of habit.
As a North Carolinian, I find the chance that Obama is pulling close here compelling. He has outspent here in ads and ground game. In fact the TV spots are so commonplace here that I've seen them aired with the local news every night for weeks now. The only McCain ads I've seen are from the "free media." In fact, Obama even had a surprise visit in Greensboro today and it generated a lot of press. He is also putting field offices in towns that have never had them before. His GOTV here is going to be excellent. Given this plus the demographic shifts in the state (similar to North Va but with a large addition of an ever growing hispanic voting block). The fact that Dems have dominated our state government makes me think a slight victory is possible. If he wins NC, I predict a win in Va, too.
As for the larger picture, the media made it a horse race, Republicans will vote for McCain out of fear, and the Conventions and debates will change everything. Getting all the Dems under the same tent is necessary, Hillary has to deliver like a true political professional and hopefully the Obama team is going to use these speeches to remind voters why the Republican brand is wrong and McCain is been there with them every step of the way. Obama must also use this time to educate the public about his tax policies vs. McCain. THIS IS HIS TRUMP CARD. How much money will average Americans leave on the table in order to vote for the 2nd coming of Herbert Hoover???? I also think the VP pick is of little consequence, except for the fact that that Obama gets a two-headed message machine one week earlier than McCain. I also believe McCain's message machine is more likely to trip up with the addition because their candidate can never stay on message and contradictions are likely to resurface with two pompous wind bags running around the country as character ASSASSins.
Besides the outcome being close helps GOTV big time.
No problem. Even though I am now strongly in Obama's camp I was a loyal Clinton supporter so I still have a tendency to criticize Obama harshly out of habit.(how do you do italics?)
Jonathan, me too, I was a Clinton supporter though it was very hard to swallow her Iraq vote. I said to myself she had the presidential race in mind and if Schumer isn't even going to vote no why should I stick my neck out? That was back in the day when most people assumed Bush could run a simple war competently. Obama didn’t though, bless him. Anyway, I fell off the Clinton wagon when she went negative of her fellow dem; I thought that plagiarism charge was slimy and disingenuous
Now I sitting her hoping he would announce that he picked her for VP because I’m convinced she would seal the deal and we could start to get some decent courts back. I’m sorry to hear that she being picked VP is very improbable. I thought smart guys would do smart things when push came to shove. I hope its polls and not ego that makes Obama think he can spend money well in NC or MT for instance and that he can just pick any one of four white guys and he won’t get burned. I think McCain will at that point pick a woman and have instant change to go along with his instant coffee. That’s just making it too easy for the old guy.
Jonathan, me too, I was a Clinton supporter though it was very hard to swallow her Iraq vote. I said to myself she had the presidential race in mind and if Schumer isn't even going to vote no why should I stick my neck out? That was back in the day when most people assumed Bush could run a simple war competently. Obama didn’t though, bless him. Anyway, I fell off the Clinton wagon when she went negative of her fellow dem; I thought that plagiarism charge was slimy and disingenuous
Now I sitting her hoping he would announce that he picked her for VP because I’m convinced she would seal the deal and we could start to get some decent courts back. I’m sorry to hear that she being picked VP is very improbable. I thought smart guys would do smart things when push came to shove. I hope its polls and not ego that makes Obama think he can spend money well in NC or MT for instance and that he can just pick any one of four white guys and he won’t get burned. I think McCain will at that point pick a woman and have instant change to go along with his instant coffee. That’s just making it too easy for the old guy.
To use italics, just surround text with POINTY BRACKETiPOINTY BRACKET POINTY BRACKET/iPOINTY BRACKET.
As for Clinton and smears I personally felt that Obama was doing similar things, he certainly benefitted from a constant stream of negative press about Hilary he did very little about and his surrogates often went after Clinton in silly ways.
A quick rebuttal: For those who say Bush won big after the polling showed the race at 5% in the late 2004 campaign . . . What was the BIG difference between Kerry and Bush . . . GOTV . . . DO I HAVE TO SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU???
Early voting is a HUGE deal, and should not be overlooked as a factor in Obama's chances at taking NC. His campaign brilliantly wove their NC primary strategy around NC's "One Stop" voting (which changed this year to include an allowance for on-site registration as well as open early/absentee voting for all registered voters). The put heavy emphasis on early voting, especially amongst their key constituencies (young voters, African-American voters, and academic/techies). They had an enormous lead coming out of early voting, enough to give them a win on election day even if Clinton had outperformed them in the polls on that day by up to around a 3% margin. If Obama and Clinton had polled 50/50 on May 6, Obama's lead from early voting would still have netted him a 5% victory in NC.
The latest Civitas poll, which gave McCain a 6% lead overall, also showed that that lead comes entirely from the "election day voters" (just over half the sample). Obama is ahead amongst the roughly one third of the sample who are "early voters" and amongst the remaining voters (9%) who haven't yet decided whether they will vote early or vote on election day. Keep in mind that Civitas is a Republican pollster; it's not idle curiosity that spurred them to ask the question.
If I wanted to gauge Obama's seriousness about NC, I would look to see where he was on October 15/16. Will he hold an early vote kick-off event here like he did for the primaries (last time, it was a major rally at UNC-Chapel Hill on the night before primary early voting started, followed the next morning by Hoops w/ Heels). If they make the same kind of push in October that they did in April, then you can kiss your prevailing wisdom goodbye.
Another thing about the model: while military towns generically might play to McCain, in NC the military towns don't break that cleanly. Fayetteville, in particular, seems like it might offer a chance to run up Dem numbers - and Obama did a lot of groundwork there in the primary. Look at primary voting in Onslow and Cumberland Counties and the NC "military" red seems pinkish, at best. Those folks want to come home. Too many tours, too many families missing their loved ones for too long. And not making shit pay for all that. It's not a given that Republicans win the for real military votes anymore.
A look at voter registration is illuminating.
In May 2004 (the last date available prior to the 2004 election:
Dems 2,408,759
Reps 1,750,359
Diff 658,400
In January 2008 the Dem/Rep registration difference was:
Dems 2,511,446
Reps 1,919,575
Diff 591,871
Republicans picked up about 67,000 registered voters between 2004 and early 2008
On August 23, it was:
Dems 2,679,991
Reps 1,939,250
Diff 740,741
That's a pickup of nearly 150,000 registered voters since January, and 83,000 since 2004. What's more remarkable is the shift in the number of African American voters:
May 2004: 984,578
January 5: 1,128,082
August 23: 1,232,097
That's an increase of nearly 250,000 since 2004, who, if they turn out, will vote at 90%+ for Obama.
Hard to believe this shift is reflected in polling.
Using Pollster.com's excellent interactive feature, I've just compared Google Insights graphs of the parties' popularity in NC with Pollster.com graphs of the candidates in the same "toss-up" state. Interesting similarities and contrasts... See my Word Face-Off blog.
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,
^^ nice blog!! ^@^
徵信, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇
徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,
徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,
徵信, 外遇, 離婚, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 征信, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,
^^ very nice
徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,
徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,
自慰,女生自慰,美女,高潮,失戀,性高潮,女性高潮,G點,自慰,性,性感,性感內衣,內衣,性感內衣,性感睡衣,情趣內衣,比基尼內衣,人妻少婦性感睡衣,
失戀,性愛,性感,情慾,調情,挑逗,慾望,情人節禮物,自慰器,
艾葳酒店經紀公司提供專業的酒店經紀, 酒店上班小姐,八大行業,酒店兼職,傳播妹,或者想要到打工兼差、打工,兼差,或者八大行業,酒店兼職,想去酒店上班, 日式酒店,制服酒店,ktv酒店,禮服店,整天穿得水水漂漂的,還是想去制服店當上班小姐,水水們如果想要擁有打工工作、晚上兼差工作、兼差打工、假日兼職、兼職工作、酒店兼差、兼差、打工兼差、日領工作、晚上兼差工作、酒店工作、酒店上班、酒店打工、兼職、兼差、兼差工作、酒店上班等,想了解酒店相關工作和特種行業內容,想兼職工作日領、假日兼職、兼差打工、或晚班兼職想擁有快速賺錢又有保障的工作嗎???又可以現領請找專業又有保障的艾葳酒店經紀公司!
艾葳酒店經紀是合法的公司工作環境高雅時尚,無業績壓力,無脫秀無喝酒壓力,高層次會員制客源,工作輕鬆,可日領、現領。
一般的酒店經紀只會在水水們第一次上班和領薪水時出現而已,對水水們的上班安全一點保障都沒有!艾葳酒店經紀公司的水水們上班時全程媽咪作陪,不需擔心!只提供最優質的酒店上班,酒店上班,酒店打工環境、上班條件給水水們。心動嗎!? 趕快來填寫你的酒店上班履歷表
水水們妳有缺現領、有兼職、缺錢卡奴的煩腦嗎?想到日本留學缺錢嗎?妳是傳播妹??想要擁有高時薪又輕鬆的夜間兼職工作,打工機會和,假日打工,假日兼職賺錢的機會嗎??想實現夢想卻又缺錢沒錢嗎!??
艾葳酒店台北酒店經紀招兵買馬!!徵專業的酒店打工,想要去酒店的水水,想要短期日領,酒店日領,禮服酒店,制服店,酒店經紀,ktv酒店,便服店,酒店工作,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店經紀人,
等相關服務 幫您快速的實現您的夢想~!!
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
菲
梵,
Post a Comment