Note: Over the course of the next two months, we will be previewing the Presidential Election matchup in each of the 50 states. The previews are built around a key set of demographic variables in each state. We continue this morning with the Magnolia State, Mississippi.
A POLARIZED STATE OF EXTREMES, Mississippi is a demographic Republican bulwark. More than any other state, it’s impossible to talk about Mississippi without discussing its dark racial history; though it’s the state with the largest number of black voters (who vote Democratic), its white vote is more numerous and almost monolithically Republican. After the Civil War, Mississippi was a reliable Democratic state, even voting for Adlai Stevenson twice over Ike. However, its white citizens were so strongly opposed to allowing blacks privileges of basic citizenship that it went for States’ Rights Party’s Strom Thurmond in 1948, Harry Byrd in 1960 (with Thurmond on the ticket), Barry Goldwater over Civil Rights Act-signing LBJ in 1964 (by 74 points!), and segregationist George Wallace in 1968 (by 40 points). Although the southern and "born-again" Carter narrowly won back the state for Democrats in the Watergate year of 1976, Ronald Reagan launched his campaign in Philadelphia, MS in 1980, a tiny town known only for being the site of three brutal lynchings during the Freedom Rides summer of 1964. Reagan hailed “states’ rights” and sent the message loud and clear that Nixon’s Southern Strategy was to be continued by the Republican Party. Mississippi went Republican in 1980 by a nose and has not been close since.
The poorest state and 2d least educated, Mississippi is a rural gun state with huge numbers of evangelicals and high unemployment. Culturally conservative, its Starbucks:Walmart ratio is the 2d lowest in the nation, and the lowest percentage of same-sex couples live here. Emphasizing its partisan polarization, the fewest number of independents live in Mississippi. Given the clear demographic lines, neither campaign appears likely to seriously contest Mississippi, ceding its six electoral votes to John McCain and the Republican column. To the extent there is action in Mississippi this year, expect it all to come from the Ronnie Musgrove-Roger Wicker Senate race.
Key Demographics
Note: Factors colored in red can generally be thought to help McCain. Factors in blue can generally be thought to help Obama. Factors in purple have ambiguous effects. Except where otherwise apparent, the numbers next to each variable represent the proportion out of each 100 residents in each state who fall into that category. Fundraising numbers reflect dollars raised in the 2008 campaign cycle per eligible voter in each state. Figures for seniors and youth voters are proportions of all residents aged 18+, rather than all residents of any age. The figure for education reflects the average number of years of completed schooling for all adults aged 25+. The figure for same-sex households reflects the number of same-sex partner households as a proportion of all households in the state. The liberal-conservative index is scaled from 0 (conservative) to 100 (liberal), based on a Likert score of voter self-identification in 2004 exit polls. The turnout rates reflect eligible voters only. Unemployment rates are current as of June 2008.
What McCain Has Going For Him
The culturally conservative Deep South. This is safe territory for Republican presidential candidates. Republicans enjoyed a 9-point partisan ID edge in 2004, but given some lingering Democratic affiliation in name only from decades earlier, the true Republican edge is a bit wider. McCain can take heart from the fact that white Democrats went almost unanimously for Hillary Clinton in the primaries, reflecting a discomfort with Obama's skin color. On the religious front, although evangelicals’ response to McCain has been tepid compared with some other Republicans (and certainly George W. Bush), the Arizona senator enjoys a 61-17 lead nationally over Obama among evangelicals and Mississippi has the 4th highest percentage of evangelicals in the country. Two other demographic factors heavily on McCain’s side are gun ownership (6th highest) and those who answer “American” to the census question on ancestry (5th highest). Both of these factors strongly favor McCain, as the NRA plans to target Obama as the most dangerous presidential nominee for gun rights ever, and because Obama's mixed ethnicity will surely be a hard pill to swallow for Mississippi's "Americans."
What Obama Has Going For Him
Large African-American population. Mississippi has the single highest percentage of African-Americans of any state in the Union at over 37%. Demographically, Mississippi skews younger (8th most voters 18-29), fewer elderly (6th fewest 65+) and female (8th highest percentage). As he did in the primary, Obama seems likely to excite the imaginations of black voters in Mississippi, but if there’s anywhere his candidacy will motivate “anti” voting, it’s probably here. High unemployment favors the change candidate, but it’s likely that overlap with black voters who are Obama’s anyway will negate this impact. Obama can take heart from the May special election results of Congressional District 1, where Democrat Travis Childers surprised most observers by winning the most culturally conservative district in the state (Hillary Clinton even won more delegates than Obama here in the March 11 primary). This result suggests that while Obama may still have a tough time here due to his racial heritage, the enthusiasm gap between the parties this cycle is also present in Mississippi and will impact turnout.
What To Watch For
Mississippi is not especially complicated; expect it to be called for McCain the moment the polls close. This is still a largely rural state where there is a white side of town and a black side of town. To win the state, Obama would need to turn out nearly every single black vote, including as of yet unregistered but eligible voters. With the large national voter registration drive underway and an historic candidacy, expect a surge in the African-American vote. If black voters made up something closer to 45% of the state's population, you’d probably see a lot more competition here; as 95% of that vote and a mere 15% of the white vote would get the job done. But even now, if Obama could capture 95% of the black vote he’d only need a bit over 23% of the white vote to win the state, but 23% of whites in this racially polarized state is likely a bridge too far.
What will be especially interesting this year is one of the two Senate races. Thad Cochran is a heavy favorite to win re-election, but the seat vacated by Trent Lott’s need to beat the calendar under the Obama-sponsored new federal lobbying law should be a close one. Our current projection is a Republican hold by 3.5%, but in the end the racial contours of the top-of-ticket contest should boost turnout for both downballot candidates. As our profile comes before McCain's VP selection, whether he picks a candidate that excites (e.g., Huckabee) or alienates (e.g., pro-choice Tom Ridge) the white evangelical base may also affect the outcome of the Senate race due to turnout impact. Watch to see if either the DSCC or the Obama campaign put money into voter registration that might capture this Senate seat for the Democrats. Though Mississippi will not be determinative in the presidential race this year, an extra seat in the Democratic Senate majority would be crucial to legislative efforts, particularly if Obama wins.
8.14.2008
Road to 270: Mississippi
by Sean Quinn @ 9:56 AM...see also mississippi, road to 270
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

72 comments
Mississippi also has some solid kayaking, FWIW.
First Indiana, and now Mississippi. Is there an order to how you're doing the states over the next 50 days?
Great work on both, BTW.
Wait a second... With the 2nd lowest Starbucks:Walmart ratio, why is the bar colored Democrat blue? I think there's been a mistake...
On this date in history, August 14, 2004, in the Rasmussen Presidential Tracking Poll, John Kerry led President George Bush 49% to 48%.
For final results, please see Presidential Inauguration Janaury 2005.
I agree that it will be called for mccain right after poll's close same with all other southern state's except va, and nc.
in the end no matter what the christians are saying they wouldnt be able to handle the thought of a lib like obama being in the pres.
Sean,
Excellent analysis.
Same question I asked Nate yesterday. Will you analyze DC as well?
Wait a second... With the 2nd lowest Starbucks:Walmart ratio, why is the bar colored Democrat blue? I think there's been a mistake...
The color of the bar indicates which party the statistic favors. A high Starbucks:Walmart ratio is favorable for Democrats, so it is blue. The fact that almost all the blue bars are small (including the S:M ratio) for this state and almost all the red bars are very big show why MS is a lock for the GOP.
x0lani--
The color of the bar is always the same, it's the length of the bar that matters. That is to say, if a long bar is good for Obama, the bar is always blue. If a long bar is good for McCain, the bar is always red.
What I'd question more is why the "rural population" bar is colored purple--that seems like a pretty strong indicator for McCain.
@costa,
That's what I mean. The ratio is 0.29 on the chart, roughly 1:3. This should favor the Republicans, but it's colored blue on the chart.
Still, a 0.29 Starbucks:Walmart ratio!? Starbucks are small and require little capital. Walmarts are big - and very expensive to build and maintain. What this says about the lack of demand for Kenyan coffee, Brazilian music, and Asian child-labor-free goods in Mississippi is telling.
Obama clearly shouldn't invest too heavily in Mississippi...
Hi all,
The order is quasi-random, except that we rigged things to make sure that we get a good mix of red and blue states throughout, and that we don't get two states from the same region going right in a row. Also, the swing states are somewhat backloaded, so you'll probably have to suffer through a few Utahs and Hawaiis at first.
That's what I mean. The ratio is 0.29 on the chart, roughly 1:3. This should favor the Republicans, but it's colored blue on the chart.
Sorry, I didn't explain myself very well. The color indicates which side the statistic favors when it is relatively high. The fact that W:R ratio is blue here means the Dems would like for it to be high. Unfortunately, in this case, it is not, thus the very small bar.
I'm still not sure if that's clear, but I'm struggling to find a better way to explain myself. =P
Suggestion:
It will be a convenience in future if in addition to your tag at the bottom you create a category at the top of this board, next to "History" with the "Road to 270 Series" to click on, and all the stories arranged alphabetically for those who click on the link.
It seems like the colors of several of those bars are off. Am I to assume a blue bar favors Obama? If so, then why is the fact that the least same-sex couples in the sountry blue? And the Starbucks: Walmart ratio? And the fact that it's the 4th worst state for Obama in fundraising? Maybe I'm just an idiot and reading it wrong. Can anyone clarify? Actually, no need to clarify that I'm an idiot, that's fairly well known, just the color of the bars. Thanks.
The bar color never changes, if I'm not mistaken. The longer the bar, the better it is for a given candidate.
The CNN exit polls from 2004 show the black/white split was:
White (65%): Bush 85%, Kerry 14%.
Black (34%): Bush 10%, Kerry 90%.
Interestingly, white women were more likely to vote for Bush (89%) than men (81%), whereas nationally the reverse was true.
Thanks Dan, that makes some sense. That particular category is good for Obama, just not necessarily the results. Looking at it through those measures, Obama is gonna get crushed in Mississippi. Thanks.
I love this conclusory nonsense: "white Democrats went almost unanimously for Hillary Clinton in the primaries, reflecting a discomfort with Obama's skin color"
And how do we know that?
Could it be that Obama is simply politically too liberal for these voters and voted for HRC as the lesser of two evils?
The whole peice had such a dark cast too it (no pun) and seemed just another excuse at (white) race baiting.
Please, Sean, leave the polemics of that kind to professionals, like me.
Well, I'm not going to argue that Obama might win, but I don't expect MS to be called the second the polls close.
If the Barr candidacy gets any traction at all (even 2-3%), and if Obama outperforms Kerry among blacks (and he will, right?), and if blacks make up a higher percentage of the electorate (and they will), then 2008 will be A LOT more competitive than 2004. If Obama could get even 20% of the white vote, it would be very close. But it will probably be more like 15%. Still we could be looking a 5 point race instead of a 20 point one. (Nate currently has a 12 pt. projection.)
Pete, I think something like 17% of white Hillary voters in MS flat-out admitted to an exit pollster they'd never met that race was the primary factor in their vote. How many more wouldn't admit it?
I've lived in Mississippi, and I highly doubt you have. They just don't like black people. I know a lot of people would like to think everyone isn't still stuck in the 60s, but it's sadly true in some parts of the country. There's no race baiting to it.
Bill Dawers,
Let it go man! Leave MS to the racists. You read what Sean had to say. Please don't dispute Sean, he is full of facts and figures and regressions to the means, after all.
I think you are a McCain concern troll in drag, btw.
Given that we are all watching the same numbers day in and day out and the numbers are fairly static. I would have thought Nevada would have created a bit more discussion than just a nah not important.
Particulalry if BO's winning strategy is now based around picking up CO, IA, NM and NV.
The main point to be gleaned from this entry is this: Mississippi is RIDICULOUS.
Adam,
Are you suggesting that there is Bradley Effect? The Stalinists here will not admit to such a possibility. You must be an idiot or a troll.
You are also very insulting to an entire state. Were you in prison when you lived there?
Jes curious.
Suggestion to Nate and Sean:
On future posts in this series, perhaps you should color the label of the demographic (in the left column) blue, red, or purple, and make the bars themselves black.
Otherwise I think we'll all be answering the same questions about the color coding over and over...
Davelondon:
The Stalinists who post regularly here will not recognize any fact or poll as legit that does not indicate at least a 45 state sweep is in the offing for Obama.
I believe they call that revisionist history or regression to the mean, I can never remember which.
I can't wait for West Virginia!
Nate, Sean: Could you add information on population change and/or net migration to/from the state (base year 2000 or 2004)? This information would:
a) help to assess, to which extent some indicators (religion, ancestry, Kerry votes, race) may be outdated - I am thinking here about strong immigration states like VA or NV, but also about the Katrina effect (LA).
b) might in itself be a useful indicator, since we have learnt from a recent VA poll that recent migrants to a state are much more likely to vote for Obama than those that have been living there for a long time. Also, I would assume that in states with out-migration, it is the conservatives that stay while the progressives .. progress elsewhere.
Pete, please stop. You keep posting the same gibberish over and over again insulting everyone here. Remember the comment guidelines please.
I second frankn's suggestion.
Okay, officially glad that I don't live in Mississippi.
But I also think this whole "American" controversy is weird. As someone who grew up in the upper midwest and now lives in the northeast, I am constantly surprised at how isolated European ancestory ethnic groups are here. My ancestors originally came from some big mess of European countries, some of whom first immigrated to Canada and a few generations later to the US, mostly over 200 years ago. So as a good little liberal, why am I required to choose some of these very distant ancestors to identify with?
Also, I'm very surprised Mississippi has such a low vet population. That's the only stat that goes against my demographic assumptions about the state. I've always assumed that poorer, more rural, and Southern states tended to have more people go into the military and Mississippi leads the way on all of those factors. Perhaps Mississippians simply use the military to get out of state and don't return. Anyone know or care to speculate about the reason for the low vet population in Mississippi?
I live in a racially mixed neighboorhood in Jackson, Mississippi. I am just saying.
The black vote is coming. My state will be a lot closer than y'all think. The fundies hate McCain, and they make a up a large block of your GOP vote.
Anyone know or care to speculate about the reason for the low vet population in Mississippi?
I think you hit the nail on the head... "how you gonna keep them down on the farm, after they've seen Paree?"
Tybalt et al: At the risk of starting an infinite recursion, I like reading what Pete Kent has to say, and I'm an Obama supporter. His posts are often thoughtful and insightful, if intentionally provocative. Even the ones that aren't so thoughtful generally make valid points, relevant to the conversation. And the ones that are just plain provocative are at least original.
On the other hand, complaining about him is either: 1) pointless, if you do consider him a troll; or 2) inaccurate, if you do not.
I, for one, prefer not to go to a blog which is an echo chamber, and where everyone agrees with me.
In one of the latest polls that posted their crosstabs, Obama was ahead in the under 39 category, so things are changing down here. It is not near as bad as Nate makes it sound.
Ditto that Jeff. I also live in Jackson. This election is exciting for Mississppi. It's the first one in 30 years that is actually a contest. Many conservatives here do not like McCain and some are just not going to vote in the election. I don't know anyone who is "excited" about him. Everyone was rooting for either Huckabee or Romney. Its going to be within five points and the outcome is all about black turnout.
Pete, please stop lying.
Nothing anyone has said here is indicative of a Bradley Effect in Mississippi.
A Bradley effect is when people lie to pollsters, claiming they will vote for the black guy for fear of being perceived as racist.
If they only lie about their REASON for voting against the black guy, that's not the Bradley Effect.
If they straight-up admit to being racists, that's not the Bradley Effect either.
I see absolutely no reason to believe that people are going to lie about preferring McCain to Obama if they are racists - only that maybe they'd claim "experience" or something else to racism.
But, then, you've been told this before, but facts don't seem to enter into your calculations, do they?
but 23% of whites in this racially polarized state is likely a bridge too far.
Thats a damning statement for Mississippi - is it the most racist state in US ?
Nate,
What is the source for your "2004 spread" numbers? Neither IN (yesterday) nor MS (today) appears to be accurate. Are you making some adjustment to the raw numbers?
Mississippi is changing, just like the rest of the South. I was just visiting there (on the gulf end of it), and it's actually quite a bit more complicated than this post would have you think. There has been a lot of progress on racial reconciliation, at least it seemed that way to me. Even though the education system is not great, there will be a large generational shift there, as in the rest of the south, just due to the racial integration of the media and sports, which are huge sociological influences. So don't write off Mississippi. Besides that, didn't the Dems just win a special election there?
MS is a long term investment. No state left behind and all.
Adam, please try to ignore the troll. Responding to him in every thread only encourages him.
@nataraj: I'd say Mississippi is the most racially polarized state politically. Whether it's the most racist state in some personal sense is harder to say---there is a lot of racism in states with fairly low black populations, but it doesn't manifest itself politically because the black population is too small to be perceived as a political threat. However if you look at measures such as housing segregation, Mississippi is not particularly unique---a lot of other states (including some supposedly liberal states) are shockingly segregated as well.
As for whether Clinton won Mississippi due to race, I'd guess in part yes, but it's a bit silly to say it's the only reason, and it's hard to say if it was the main reason. Lots of other demographic factors favored Clinton in the state as well. For example, nationwide Obama did better than Clinton among well-educated people, and worse among people with only a high-school degree or less; the fact that Mississippi is the second-least-educated state obviously favored Clinton by that measure.
As a white Mississippian, I found this piece to be fairly offensive. If national Democrats continue to hold this attitude toward the state, we won't be winning it any time soon.
I'm glad guys like Howard Dean and Chuck Schumer haven't given up on states like Mississippi.
This state elected governors in the 80s like William Winters and Ray Mabus who each had platforms that sought to benefit the black community.
Our past has been well-documented, but we've made in efforts in the past 15 years or so to correct that while other states have stayed silent on past crimes.
Too many folks just point to the South as the only region where racism exists. You refuse to ignore that states like Indiana at one point had the largest KKK organization and states out West have huge anti-hispanic organizations.
Look at yourself in the mirror before you point at us.
SL Scott... I too enjoy Pete Kent, for the following reasons:
1.) He seems bright, he writes well and he puts some thought into his posts
2.) Some recognition should be given to the fact that it does take gallantry to stand virtually alone against group opinion
3.) I sense some underlying humor and a tongue-in-cheek element in a lot of what he says, which I find appealing
On the other hand, Pete does need an occasional brisk yank on his choke chain, which others in here are thankfully willing to provide.
(And if he calls Brian Scheitzer an "oaf" one more time, I'm really going to be quite cross :-)
Mississippi is one of the states for which Nate's regression is quite off the current polling (trend-adjusted polls McCain +9.9, regression McCain +16.4). So there should be something going on there that is not captured by Nate's regression variables, which I believe are the same ones that are published with this post.
Since a number of Mississippians are on this thread - any hint what Nate's regression may be missing?
"As a white Mississippian, I found this piece to be fairly offensive. If national Democrats continue to hold this attitude toward the state, we won't be winning it any time soon."
I never said give up on it. I expect MS to be within 5 points. But you're lying if you expect Obama to *ever* win more than 25% of the white vote. 20% is a big stretch. I'm fully in favor of the 50-state strategy, but a win in MS will come with massive black turnout and lifelong white Republicans who sit out because they don't like McCain. Don't kid yourself.
And Pete, once again, the Bradley effect is when people *say* they'll vote for the black candidate and then don't. Nobody in MS is saying they will. It's a difference in poll results and actual results, not something referring to racist attitudes in general. But I'm sure you knew that.
By the way, the actual numbers necessary for a MS win:
61% white: M 80% O 20%
39% black: M 3% O 97%
Total: M 49.97% O 50.03%
I believe Kerry won 18% of whites; correct me if I'm wrong.
Why is the number of Catholics in a state counted as a factor that will automatically benefit Obama (rather than a neutral factor like the number of seniors or something) given that Bush won a majority of the Catholic vote in the last election, while running against a Catholic? (This was also, I believe, the first time a Republican won the majority of the Catholic vote.)
Bush carried MS with 60%. McCain is only carrying it with 52%.
McCain "has some work to do".
Also, Research2000 shows McCain plummeting 6 points from May to July in MS.
By employing Mr. Kent's new and improved Logic-Free reasoning, it's obvious to see that there is no way McCain can win MS. Further, by cherry-picking a region or small demographic, it can be conclusively proven that not a single person in MS will vote for McCain in November. He's just too white.
Hey, this freedom from evidence and logic is pretty neat! I'm almost ready to vote Republican.
Here we go with the race baiting again.
I am a black person voting for McCain, and I think the real racists are black people voting for Obama just because he is black.
Do you think if Obama was white Mississippi would be any different? If Obama were white Mississippi would be no where as close as it is now. I guarantee most Mississippians do not like Obama because he is too liberal, not because he is black.
Also, Mississippi may be the 2nd most "uneducated" state, but charts like that are stastistically flawed. The states at the top of the chart have low minority populations and low senior citizen population. The states at the bottom have high minority populations and high senior citizen populations. This is no coincidence.
"Do you think if Obama was white Mississippi would be any different?"
You're correct here. The type of white voters in Mississippi who would never vote for a black man would very likely never vote for a Democrat anyway. Kerry won 18% of the white vote, and Obama will likely get 15-18%.
Likewise, blacks regularly vote 90% Democratic, and will probably be 95-96% this year. Take from that what you will. You are, however, in a very small subgroup given your demographics and voting preferences.
This bit of Nate's analysis is misleading at best:
the Arizona senator enjoys a 61-17 lead nationally over Obama among evangelicals and Mississippi has the 4th highest percentage of evangelicals in the country.
The 61-17 number is from George Barna's poll and his definition of evangelical is not at all comparable to any other poll. Almost all other pollsters accept self-identification as their measure of 'evangelicalness' and they usually get numbers approaching 40% of the voters. Only 8% of the country is evangelical, according to Barna's definition which is involves holding a specific set of beliefs. There is no way that 39.7% of the Missippi population are 'Barna-style' white evangelicals.
Here's Barna's taxonomy of Christians:
"Born again Christians" are defined as people who said they have made a personal commitment to Jesus Christ that is still important in their life today and who also indicated they believe that when they die they will go to Heaven because they had confessed their sins and had accepted Jesus Christ as their savior. Respondents are not asked to describe themselves as "born again."
"Evangelicals" meet the born again criteria (described above) plus seven other conditions. Those include saying their faith is very important in their life today; believing they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs about Christ with non-Christians; believing that Satan exists; believing that eternal salvation is possible only through grace, not works; believing that Jesus Christ lived a sinless life on earth; asserting that the Bible is accurate in all that it teaches; and describing God as the all-knowing, all-powerful, perfect deity who created the universe and still rules it today. Being classified as an evangelical is not dependent upon church attendance or the denominational affiliation of the church attended. Respondents were not asked to describe themselves as "evangelical."
Non-evangelical born again Christians meet the born again criteria described above, but not the evangelical criteria.
Notional Christians are those who consider themselves to be Christian but do not meet the born again criteria.
"More than any other state, it’s impossible to talk about Mississippi without discussing its dark racial history."
Its dark racial history? Is this an inadvertent mixed metaphor?
Tybalt et al: At the risk of starting an infinite recursion, I like reading what Pete Kent has to say, and I'm an Obama supporter.
I have no problem with Pete and similarly am happy to read what he has to say. When he repeats the same simple insults ("Stalinists") or clumsy sarcasm about regression, over and over again in post after post, that doesn't count as "something to say".
I am quite happy to talk to and listen to those with opposing viewpoints, but the comments policy here is "don't be an asshole" and some here are abusing that policy regularly.
I think Mississippi is the only Deep South state that is actually in play in this election, and we are under-cutting the possibility of an Obama Mississippi upset. The state has a 37% black population, and Obama is likely to win at least 95% of them! Although I am in NYC, and quite disconnected from Mississippi culturally, I agree with southerndem79's statement. We can't write off the state.
Kerry earned 18% of white men and 10% of white women according to CNN's 2004 Mississippi exit polls. Obama has been doing significantly better with women nationally than Kerry did (he only won that demographic 51-48 and lost white women 44-55). Polls have been indicating that Obama is "winning" women by an 11% margin (49-38) in this poll for example.
Also, here is an analysis on Pollster that explains Obama's performance with white women nationally where he is essentially tying McCain on average in polls instead of 11% behind like Kerry was. This seems to indicate that Obama would be able to earn more than Kerry's abysmal 10% of white women in Mississippi, and maybe even increase his share to 18%. If so, and a modest few point gain with white men frustrated with Bush and McCain, he'll pull into that infamous 20% threshold. Combine that with massively increased black turnout which could easily be 40% of the total electorate, and he takes the state.
I have to admit, though, I'm a bit baffled by how Kerry only garnered 10% of white women's votes in Mississippi while getting 18% of white men's. Maybe someone from the state can explain why white women are less likely to vote Democratic than white men, because it runs counter-intuitive for me and seems out of sync with national patterns.
I suggest to Sean and others here to read this article below, the Ten, Ten, Ten solution. Boost AA turnout by 10%: doable. Boost BHO appeal among AA by 10%: certain. And Boost BHO appeal among whites by 10%: possible. That would result in a 50:50 split. Early call? Perhaps not.
MS has a chance, and its not so far fetched.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/18/115022/815
wrt Mr. Kent, I am most struck by his routine digs at Nate and Sean.
If he really feels that this site is so biased, perhaps there is another that he would be more at home in. Insulting your hosts is usually considered rude in any culture.
He has made his "point" again and again ad nauseum. Apparently the nation is really, really upset about abortion and socialism, which is why we should ignore the polls and recognise that McCain will win. And since Obama isn't winning in a landslide, he will most certainly lose in November. And as long as there are 500 people who will vote for McCain anywhere in the country, then Obama will "have work to do" and we should all be worried. Oh, and we're all communists, too.
That pretty much sums it up, so that should spare him posting for a while. But it won't.
Overall, he's been less and less about polling, and more about attacking anyone's confidence in Obama's campaign. I don't find that illuminating. YMMV.
Outside of MS Philadelphia may only be know for the lynchings but it is famous in the state for its fair. It is the most important political event of the year in MS. Every political mover and shaker in the state rents a cabin on the fairgrounds and Political speaches are the main attraction.
In addition to Larry's statement, I wouldn't exactly say that Philadelphia is known outside of MS only for lynchings. Although this has no political impact and little historical impact, Philadelphia was the hometown of celebrated Oklahoma running back Marcus Dupree. His falling out with Barry Switzer was even referred to as "The New Philadelphia Story" in a Sports Illustrated article.
Having said too much here that is not value-add, let me actually deal with Mississippi for a sec. It seems obvious to me that Obama's chances in MS, such that they are, would depend on an all-out attack on economic terms and boosting black turnout.
Such an attack would probably need to be heavily ground-based, try to engage poor whites to embrace Obama's constructive plans for poverty relief (whatever those may be... let's just say that right now it's unimpressive) and be focused to the maximum extent on tailoring a message just for Mississippi. That seems to me an awfully expensive way to deal with a longshot state with 6 EV and a spread-out population.
There's no doubt in my mind, though, that the 5% chance showing up in the state breakdown involves boosting turnout of the poorest whites in Mississippi and getting them to somehow vote for Obama. That seems like a real longshot. McCain is not the candidate for Mississippi (you'd never beat Mike Huckabee here without actual thunderbolts hurled from above) but he's plenty good enough.
Adam: Kerry carried 14% of the white vote, not 18%, according to CNN exit polling.
These individual state analyses are cool. Can you create a section on the site to collect all of them? I know you've only done two so far, but it would be great to have a one-stop reference shop for them all.
I'm loving these profiles. Thanks for all your work!
A big reason for Childers district 1 Democratic victory was his pro-life stance. Check back on MS when the Democrats have a candidate independent enough to run nationally with a pro-life platform.
ok, ok, ok...I'm an educated professional, 35-year-old white male living in Miss., and I'm voting for Obama.
Here are some things to ponder:
- mccain's grandfather is a mississippian
- baptist, and there are tons of 'em, are pro-life
- expect a strong black voter turnout, at least among civil rights era generation
- first presidential debate is held at Ole Miss on 9/26
- improved conditions in Iraq?
- 1 in 2 blacks in the Delta are born into poverty...can obama sell his message of change?
- uneducated white voters, bubba and billie jo, would never vote for a black man? a white segregationist group here is calling for whites to vote for obama to further their cause
While it is true that Mississippi has a toubled history in race relations, here, we have also been forced to deal with these issues. Mississippi is not the same it was 40, 50, 60 years ago. Yes, we still have room to improve, but racist live everywhere, and I would bet other states have further to go than we do.
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,美國aneros,rudeboy,英國rudeboy,英國Rocksoff,德國Fun Factory,Fun Factory,英國甜筒造型按摩座,甜筒造型按摩座,英國Rock Chic ,瑞典 Lelo ,英國Emotional Bliss,英國 E.B,荷蘭 Natural Contours,荷蘭 N C,美國 OhMiBod,美國 OMB,Naughti Nano ,音樂按摩棒,ipod按摩棒,美國 The Screaming O,美國TSO,美國TOPCO,美國Doc Johnson,美國CA Exotic,美國CEN,美國Nasstoy,美國Tonguejoy,英國Je Joue,美國Pipe Dream,美國California Exotic,美國NassToys,美國Vibropod,美國Penthouse,仿真按摩棒,矽膠按摩棒,猛男倒模,真人倒模,仿真倒模,PJUR,Zestra,適趣液,穿戴套具,日本NPG,雙頭龍,FANCARNAL,日本NIPPORI,日本GEL,日本Aqua Style,美國WET,費洛蒙,費洛蒙香水,仿真名器,av女優,打炮,做愛,性愛,口交,吹喇叭,肛交,魔女訓練大師,無線跳蛋,有線跳蛋,震動棒,震動保險套,震動套,TOY-情趣用品,情趣用品網,情趣購物網,成人用品網,情趣用品討論,成人購物網,鎖精套,鎖精環,持久環,持久套,拉珠,逼真按摩棒,名器,超名器,逼真老二,電動自慰,自慰,打手槍,仿真女郎,SM道具,SM,性感內褲,仿真按摩棒,pornograph,hunter系列,h動畫,成人動畫,成人卡通,情色動畫,情色卡通,色情動畫,色情卡通,無修正,禁斷,人妻,極悪調教,姦淫,近親相姦,顏射,盜攝,偷拍,本土自拍,素人自拍,公園露出,街道露出,野外露出,誘姦,迷姦,輪姦,凌辱,痴漢,痴女,素人娘,中出,巨乳,調教,潮吹,av,a片,成人影片,成人影音,線上影片,成人光碟,成人無碼,成人dvd,情色影音,情色影片,情色dvd,情色光碟,航空版,薄碼,色情dvd,色情影音,色情光碟,線上A片,免費A片,A片下載,成人電影,色情電影,TOKYO HOT,SKY ANGEL,一本道,SOD,S1,ALICE JAPAN,皇冠系列,老虎系列,東京熱,亞熱,武士系列,新潮館,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套,G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,生日精品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票號碼,夜市,統一發票對獎,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解,av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情, 股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上掃毒,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,火車,房屋,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套, G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,精品,禮品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票,夜市,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解, av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av ,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情,股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上a片,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,借錢,房屋,街頭籃球,找工作,旅行社,六合彩,水噹噹,台中隆鼻,果凍隆乳,改運整型,自體脂肪移植,新娘造型,婚禮顧問,下川島,常平,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼, 婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,白蟻,白蟻,除蟲,老鼠,減肥,減肥,在家工作,在家工作,水噹噹,台中隆鼻,果凍隆乳,改運整型,自體脂肪移植,新娘造型,婚禮顧問,下川島,常平,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼, 婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,白蟻,白蟻,除蟲,老鼠,減肥,減肥,在家工作,在家工作,婚友,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友,交友,交友,婚友社,婚友社,婚友社,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,越南新娘,外籍新娘,外籍新娘,台中坐月子中心,搬家公司,搬家公司,中和搬家,台北搬家,板橋搬家,新店搬家,線上客服,網頁設計,線上客服,網頁設計,植牙,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,交友,越南新娘,婚友社,外籍新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,交友,外籍新娘,視訊聊天,大陸新娘,婚友社,婚友,越南新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,視訊交友,外籍新娘,網路排名,網路排名軟體,網站排名優化大師,關鍵字排名大師,網站排名seo大師,關鍵字行銷專家,關鍵字,seo,關鍵字行銷,網頁排序,網頁排名,關鍵字大師,seo大,自然排名,網站排序,網路行銷創業,汽車借款,汽車借錢,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,拉皮,抽脂,近視雷射,隆乳,隆鼻,變性,雙眼皮,眼袋,牙齒,下巴,植牙,人工植牙,植髮,雷射美容,膠原蛋白,皮膚科,醫學美容,玻尿酸,肉毒桿菌,微晶瓷,電波拉皮,脈衝光,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,英語演講,托福,Toastmaster,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,借錢,借貸,當舖,借款,借貸,借錢,週轉,
^^ nice blog!! ^@^
徵信, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇
徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,
徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,
徵信, 外遇, 離婚, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 征信, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,
^^ very nice
徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,
徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,
a片,成人網站,美女交友,美女視訊,a片,成人網站,美女交友,美女視訊,a片,成人網站,美女交友,美女視訊,聊天室,美女視訊,聊天室,美女視訊
成人網站,成人影片,av女優,h漫,成人網站,成人電影,a片,色情,成人影片,色情,成人電影,色情,h漫,成人影片,成人電影,免費A片,色情,成人電影,成人影片,免費A片,色情,成人網站,情趣用品,免費A片,成人網站,色情,a片,成人影片,情色,免費A片,微風成人,情色,成人影片,微風成人,av女優
成人網站,色情網站,av女優,色情,成人網站,成人影片,成人電影,av女優,a片,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人影片,av女優
色情,h漫,sex,情色,a片,成人網站,成人影片,av女優,色情
h漫,sex,情色,辣妹視訊,080視訊聊天室,美女交友
情色視訊,哈啦聊天室,ut聊天室,聊天室
美女交友,美女交友,美女交友,視訊辣妹,視訊辣妹,視訊辣妹,視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室,成人交友,成人交友,成人交友,視訊美女,視訊美女,視訊美女,聊天室,聊天室,聊天室
成人網站,av女優,成人網站,a片,成人影片,成人電影,h漫,成人電影,色情,成人影片,色情,免費A片,成人影片,免費A片,情色,微風成人
美女交友,美女交友,視訊辣妹,視訊辣妹,視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室,成人交友,成人交友,視訊美女,視訊美女,聊天室,聊天室
美女交友,美女交友,美女交友,視訊辣妹,視訊辣妹,視訊辣妹,視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室,視訊聊天室,成人交友,成人交友,成人交友,視訊美女,視訊美女,視訊美女,聊天室,聊天室,聊天室
a片,成人網站,av女優,h漫,成人影片,免費a片,情趣用品,色情,微風成人,情色,sex,成人電影,聊天室,美女交友,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,成人交友,美女視訊,聊天室,美女交友,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,成人交友,美女視訊,成人網站,情色,情趣用品,色情,sex,免費a片,h漫,av女優,成人影片,a片,微風成人,成人電影聊天室,美女交友,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,成人交友,美女視訊,聊天室,美女交友,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,成人交友,美女視訊,成人電影,成人網站,情色,情趣用品,色情,sex,免費a片,h漫,av女優,成人影片,a片,微風成人,聊天室,美女交友,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,成人交友,美女視訊,聊天室,美女交友,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,成人交友,美女視訊
a片,a片,a片,a片,a片,av女優,av女優,av女優,av女優,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,h漫,h漫,h漫,h漫,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,成人網站,免費A片,免費A片,免費A片,免費A片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人電影,成人電影,成人電影,成人電影,免費A片,免費A片,免費A片,免費A片,成人電影,成人電影,成人電影,成人電影,色情,色情,色情,色情,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,微風成人,微風成人,微風成人,微風成人,色情,色情,色情,色情,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,色情,色情,色情,色情,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,成人影片,情色,情色,情色,情色,打卡鐘,跳蛋,持久液,色情網站,黃金回收,借錢,植牙,牙醫,成人網站,成人影片,av女優,色情,h漫,情色,sex,黃金價格,黃金,黃金買賣,黃金存摺,鑽石價格,鑽石回收,鑽石買賣,當舖,辣妹視訊,080視訊聊天室,美女交友,情色視訊,哈啦聊天室,ut聊天室,聊天室,打卡鐘,火鍋吃到飽,創業加盟,賺錢,吃到飽麻辣鍋
艾葳酒店經紀公司提供專業的酒店經紀, 酒店上班小姐,八大行業,酒店兼職,傳播妹,或者想要到打工兼差、打工,兼差,或者八大行業,酒店兼職,想去酒店上班, 日式酒店,制服酒店,ktv酒店,禮服店,整天穿得水水漂漂的,還是想去制服店當上班小姐,水水們如果想要擁有打工工作、晚上兼差工作、兼差打工、假日兼職、兼職工作、酒店兼差、兼差、打工兼差、日領工作、晚上兼差工作、酒店工作、酒店上班、酒店打工、兼職、兼差、兼差工作、酒店上班等,想了解酒店相關工作和特種行業內容,想兼職工作日領、假日兼職、兼差打工、或晚班兼職想擁有快速賺錢又有保障的工作嗎???又可以現領請找專業又有保障的艾葳酒店經紀公司!
艾葳酒店經紀是合法的公司工作環境高雅時尚,無業績壓力,無脫秀無喝酒壓力,高層次會員制客源,工作輕鬆,可日領、現領。
一般的酒店經紀只會在水水們第一次上班和領薪水時出現而已,對水水們的上班安全一點保障都沒有!艾葳酒店經紀公司的水水們上班時全程媽咪作陪,不需擔心!只提供最優質的酒店上班,酒店上班,酒店打工環境、上班條件給水水們。心動嗎!? 趕快來填寫你的酒店上班履歷表
水水們妳有缺現領、有兼職、缺錢卡奴的煩腦嗎?想到日本留學缺錢嗎?妳是傳播妹??想要擁有高時薪又輕鬆的夜間兼職工作,打工機會和,假日打工,假日兼職賺錢的機會嗎??想實現夢想卻又缺錢沒錢嗎!??
艾葳酒店台北酒店經紀招兵買馬!!徵專業的酒店打工,想要去酒店的水水,想要短期日領,酒店日領,禮服酒店,制服店,酒店經紀,ktv酒店,便服店,酒店工作,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店經紀人,
等相關服務 幫您快速的實現您的夢想~!!
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
菲
梵,
Post a Comment