8.17.2008

Pastor Warren Contradicts Self on 'Cone of Silence'

Note: Second Update below contains video of Warren's appearance today on CNN. [9:19 PM CDT]

In yesterday's Saddleback Forum, pastor Rick Warren on two occasions referred to John McCain's "cone of silence", implying strongly that he had not been able to hear the questions posed to Barack Obama ahead of time -- questions which were, in many cases, identical to the ones posed to McCain.

This was Pastor Warren during Barack Obama's segment last night. Apologies for the capitalization -- it is in the original transcript -- but emphasis is mine:

NOW WHAT I'VE DECIDED IS TO ALLOW FOR PROPER COMPARISON I'M GOING TO ASK IDENTICAL QUESTIONS TO EACH OF THESE CANDIDATES SO YOU CAN COMPARE APPLES TO APPLES. NOW SENATOR OBAMA IS GOING TO GO FIRST. WE FLIPPED A COIN. AND WE HAVE SAFELY PLACED SENATOR MCCAIN IN A CONE OF SILENCE. EACH OF THE INTERVIEWS WILL BE SEGMENTED INTO FOUR DIFFERENT SECTIONS WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AT A FOUR DIFFERENT THINGS AND THE NUMBER OF QUESTIONS ANSWERED IN EACH SEGMENT WILL DEPEND ON HOW SUCCINCT THE SENATOR IS.
Warren again referred to the "cone of silence" at the very beginning of McCain's segment. McCain's response is obviously a joke, and a pretty funny one at that, but the important part is that Warren is implying that the cone of silence is an actual, physical place:
Q. WELCOME BACK TO THE SADDLEBACK CIVIL FORUM ON THE PRESIDENCY AND WELCOME SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN. NOW MY FIRST QUESTION WAS THE CONE OF SILENCE COMFORTABLE THAT YOU WERE IN JUST NOW?

A. I WAS TRYING TO HEAR THROUGH THE WALL.
However, Warren was just interviewed by CNN's Rick Sanchez, and apparently told him that McCain was not in the church during the first half-hour of Obama's segment. (I did not see the segment myself, nor does a transcript or video yet seem to be available). Sanchez has now suggested that Warren implied to him that he (Warren) thought McCain was in the "cone of silence" when he told the audience as much, but later learned that McCain was not.

This is highly despicable behavior, folks, on the part of McCain, Warren or possibly both. There's simply no way around it.

UPDATE: Let me be more clear about what I am suggesting. I am not suggesting that Warren conspired in some way with McCain. In fact, I thought his questions last night were exceptionally fair -- how couldn't they be, since both candidates were asked the same questions?

However, based on Warren's accounting of the proceedings, what we know is as follows:

1. Warren assumed that, at the time he began to interview Senator Obama, that Senator McCain had been placed into a 'cone of silence'. Warren probably had no way to verify McCain's whereabouts immediately before taking stage; he was, according to pictures posted at the Saddleback website, speaking with Sen. Obama in the green room.

2. However, Senator McCain was in fact not at the church or in any other quarantined location at the time he began to interview Obama; instead, he was in his motorcade on the way to the site for approximately the first half-hour of the proceedings.

3. Warren says he asked McCain whether he had heard any of the questions, and McCain said that he had not; Warren "trust[s] the integrity" of McCain's answer.

If McCain was in the motorcade, then there would be absolutely nothing, other than his honor, that would prevent him from hearing Obama's questions. However, it is probably impossible to verify whether McCain had in fact heard any of the questions. The only people who could say for sure were the people in the motorcade with John McCain.

What we can possibly verify is whether the McCain people had violated an implied or expressed promise to have arrived at the venue by the time that Barack Obama's interview began. Warren implied to a national audience that McCain was in a quarantined area at the time Obama's interview began, but in fact McCain was not.

Warren is on Larry King's show tomorrow night; the questions that King should ask him are things like:

1) What were the rules of the game were intended to be ahead of time, particularly as it reflects the 'cone of silence'?

2) Did he specifically request that the McCain people have their candidate show up to the event by at least the time of Barack Obama's interview?

3) When did he learn that McCain had not in fact been placed into the 'cone of silence'?

Whether Warren actually believes that McCain heard the questions or not is immaterial. Warren, evidently, considers both McCain and Obama to be friends, and he takes them at their word.

But the point is, there were supposed to be controls in place that prevented this situation from arising -- a situation where McCain was in a position to cheat without any consequence for having done so. Those controls broke down. We need to learn more about what those controls were, and why they broke down.

UPDATE: Here's the video.


259 comments

Overrated said...

Smitty - I appreciate your feelings. It is curious to me that Obama taught part-time for those yrs. He never received tenure and never pursued a career in this field. He has not written any legal opinions of note nor is his legal mind respected by legal scholars since he has written no significant opinions. Worse yet, Obama has moved around without any real roots. Who is this guy? He attended a politically divisive church for 20yrs and had his kids baptised at the same church. Tellingly, he has been running for Pres longer than he has been a US Senator. I will grant you that he is smart, but at 47 years of age, can you name me one significant piece of legislation or great piece of scholarship or job accomplishment to date? He is applying for the greatest CEO position in the world. Do you think he should have a better resume?

realistxxx said...

Nate said...

Mule,

The story has hit tomorrow's New York Times, for what it's worth.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/18/us/politics/18mccain.html?ref=politics

---------------

Like I said, Oops!

realistxxx said...

Nate said...

Mule,

The story has hit tomorrow's New York Times, for what it's worth.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/18/us/politics/18mccain.html?ref=politics

-------------------

Like I said, "Oops!"

John Nail said...

The official admission that McCain was not in the Cone of Silence and the accordant insults.
http://www.johnmccain.com/mccainreport/Read.aspx?guid=86cd988c-66ce-4416-951e-489c30596ee1

Again we have "plausible deniability" here...no mention of staff etc. and what they knew or obviously did...

Sedi said...

The issue is not whether Warren intentionally benefited McCain; few are suggesting that he did. Nor is the central issue whether McCain actually received the questions ahead of time, though if there was some way to determine this it might become a bigger issue. The issue, as Nate pointed out, is that he didn't follow the rules and was in a position where he could have cheated. Either McCain is to be blamed for not following the rules or Warren is to be blamed for not making it clearer to McCain's people precisely what the rules are. It's a violation of trust to say that someone is in a "cone of silence" and doesn't know the questions when, in fact, they aren't in a cone of silence and might know the questions.

Mule Rider said...

Nate,

Okay, thanks. I'm not all that surprised, but it didn't share anything in particular. No detais.

Even the 9/11 conspiracy theorists got plenty of play in the MSM. I'm looking for a smoking gun.

Besides, and I think Rudy said this, all the talk earlier was how this was a non-event, especially being opposite the Olympics...

And now we have Saddleback-gate?

I seriously doubt Rick Warren was disingenuous in any way. He may have said something slightly inaccurate mistakingly, but the last thing I'd do is try and implicate him of anything sinister.

I won't say 100% that McCain is innocent, but my gut says this doesn't add up to him "cheating." Even if he did hear the questions ahead of time, he still had no more than 30 minutes to "think ahead" about what he was going to say. Some huge advantage. If the most intelligent, charismatic, and talented politican in generations can't outperform a 72-year old has been C-student, scarred permanently in Vietname, 5th from the bottom in his class with "30 minutes" of prep time, then I think Obama has bigger problems than McCain possibly "cheating."

John Nail said...

From JED Report:

"But I will again make this simple point: the issue isn't whether or not McCain broke the rules so he could cheat, it's that by breaking the rules he cast a shadow over the whole process.

It's just like his relationship with his top foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann. Scheunemann has received $800,000 from the government of Georgia, and until March worked for them. Because of that, whether or not his advice is right, there is a cloud of suspicion over the McCain campaign.

What we're now learning is that the McCain campaign thinks they play by different rules than anybody else."

John Nail said...

The sad thing here is that there is any question at all of what happened...that only hurts McCain and Warren and frankly taints what was a very interesting event conceptually.

I have no doubt that McCain got an edge but we will never know for sure..

The reality is he did not need one playing on home field in front of people that that at worst leaned his way vs. Obama.

Hiram said...

Both candidates know Rev. Warren and his interests. They'd have to be very foolish not to guess at certain areas Warren would want to cover, such as orphans as this is a big deal to Warren. Considering this, Obama's comment about "cheating" probably means he anticipated a question in this area and looked up some information beforehand. Since none of us can really prove anything about something we really know nothing about, I'll take my explanation. If this whole thing gets increased coverage, someone will probably ask Obama about his comment and we'll see his explanation.

John Nail said...

Mule Rider - So what you are saying is that not following the rules and cutting corners is the type of moral fiber that we want in our President?

Forget the outcome of this non debate .... McCain's entire story and appeal is what we heard last nite. "I stayed behind rather than get special treatment".....powerful stuff if true....devastating if his standards are no longer those and he would cheat to get a 30 min prep advantage in an important appearance..

MATT J. H. said...

Nicolle Wallace, a spokeswoman for Mr. McCain, said “The insinuation from the Obama campaign that John McCain, a former prisoner of war, cheated is outrageous,” Ms. Wallace said

Give me a break. What a crock of shit. We know Mr. War hero gets special treatment but I didn't realize it was unamerican to question his integrity. Of course a war hero wouldn't make up a story about a cross in a prison camp, that would be disgusting and vile for a person to say that in a place of worship to get votes. A war hero would never do that, too much integrity.

I know Obama won't toutch this, but I would not let McCain use POW as a defense. Go right at it. They just opened the door.

John Nail said...

hiram - Warren said tonite on CNN that the one question he did not get a chance to prep McCain on, though he did prep Barack, was this orphan one. he said it to Rick Sanchez around 10:15 EST

cowbat friend said...

mule is now going to attack every media organ which carries this story. good luck, mule.

Shen-gri-la said...

Obama admitted having had a chance to preview the "orphan" question.....even though it was Warren who gave him a "peek" at it.

If McCain was a honorable man, he would have said, "Sorry, we were running late and I was in the car during the first half of Obama's questioning," instead of making a lame joke that turned out to be hiding a lie.

Shen-gri-la said...

Obama admitted having had a chance to preview the "orphan" question.....even though it was Warren who gave him a "peek" at it.

If McCain was a honorable man, he would have said, "Sorry, we were running late and I was in the car during the first half of Obama's questioning," instead of making a lame joke that turned out to be hiding a lie.

Mule Rider said...

John Nail,

No, it's not what we want from our President. But I think we owe it to everyone else involved to see if there's any hint of credibility to the story before taking it and running with it.

So McCain outperformed compared to what a lot of people thought he would. That means he cheated? Look, a lot of people have already said that he was leaning to heavily on (succinct) taglines from typical campaign rhetoric while Obama was giving (overly) insightful answers. McCain only looked like he did much better because he answered more quickly and authoritatively, knowing he didn't have to dance around certain topics because of his audience like Obama would have to.

If there was anything unfair about it, it's the simple venue it's being held at. Obama had little to gain by agreeing to it. It was just an introductory pose to give him some press time so people won't think he's a shadow nutjob who conspicuously hides from the evangelical base.

PeteKent said...

Nate:

The NYTs also ran with the story about Bush's military service based on forged documents. They have zero cred.

John Nail said...

Video tonite of Warren on the issue and last nite:

http://www.cnn.com/video/savp/evp/?loc=dom&vid=/video/politics/2008/08/17/rick.warren.forum.interview.cnn

Hiram said...

Just checked the CNN website and found this in a story about this "controversy:"

"The pastor spoke to each candidate this week, giving the general themes. Warren decided to tell them each the first two questions in advance, about the three wisest people you know, and the biggest moral failings."

This reinforces my earlier surmise about Obama's "cheating" comment. I am a strong Obama supporter--really, was even at his Super Tuesday rally at the Hyatt in Chicago--and I think this whole thing is being overblown.

McCain's answers were all from his stump speeches. It is no surprise that he did well. The success of each candidate is in the eye of the beholder. I like Obama's nuanced answers, showing he really considers many components of a problem. McCain is a shoot from the hip kind of guy. If you like that, great, but we've had that kind of President for eight years and don't need another four years of the same.

Darren said...

...The issue, as Nate pointed out, is that [McCain] didn't follow the rules...

Not to pick on Sedi, but this seems to be what's sticking in people's craw. Obama's campaign seems to thrive on mastering and enforcing the rules, and it seems his supporters see it as a given that the rules are unbending and that people care about them. Sorry to say that's not really the case. If people cared so much about rules, they would have cared about McCain's questionable exit of primary matching funds, about Obama's stepping out of the campaign finance system (not a legal requirement, but nevertheless an accepted rule that all presidential candidates have followed for 32 years), or any number of other details that only junkies talk about.

Voters have especially low expectations of politicians. Both McCain and Obama have ample flexibility to bend the rules before they've broken them in the mind of the public. They literally get the benefit of the doubt - voters naturally doubt everything politicians do anyway, so unless they do something truly egregious they benefit from having met low expectations.

ty said...

Nate: Too bad the NYT story is on page A12. Anyone know whether that's likely to be the back page of the front section (and thus fairly visible), or buried in its interior?

Mule Rider said...

cowbat friend,

No, I won't attack it...in fact, if it really has legs and it's proven, I'll believe it. How about that? I'm not as stubborn as you might think.

But as I mentioned earlier, any ridiculous innuendo can seep into the MSM for a short while, but as it is right now, these are the only damning "facts":

1) Warren said McCain was in a "cone of silence" - turns out, he was not

2) McCain made a crack about trying to listen through the walls - which couldn't be possible if he weren't confined by those walls

3) McCain seemed better prepared to answer questions (that were tailor made for someone espousing socially conservative ideals), even lunging ahead on a couple of them, seemingly in a prescient manner, as if he knew they were coming

4) McCain was apparently in his motorcade on the way to the church instead of the cone of silence where communication either directly or via third party is possible

So it seems to me, one of three things is going on here.

It's all coincidence, and the talk of a "cone of silence" was just Warren mis-speaking and McCain was no more prepared than Obama for questioning.

McCain and/or Warren are being slightly more disingenuous than we give them credit for, dancing around the "cone of silence" thing because it didn't seem appropriate to reveal he was "on his way" as opposed to "in a room" like he was supposed to be, but he still played by the rules and didn't know anything ahead of time.

Or, McCain did cheat and got 30 minutes to an hour to prep for questioning. Keep in mind this is the "worst-case" scenario. Does it make McCain look foolish to try and get an edge in an event he has home field advantage? Yes. But if Obama is the great "uniter" who can speak eloquently and genuinely to any crowd and McCain is a senile fuddy-duddy, do we really believe an hour of prep time for the old fart is worth stirring up dust even if it meant McCain was cutting corners?

If that's the towel you liberals want to cry in, so be it. I'd think you prefer to hammer McCain on a number of other things besides "prep time" for a supposed impromptu discussion in church.

John Nail said...

McCain Campaign now complaining of Obama bias with NBC due to this controversy:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12594.html

Again attack with "plausible deniability".....

These guys are Rovian and good..

ty said...

Mule: "So McCain outperformed compared to what a lot of people thought he would. That means he cheated?" Strawman. Has anyone argued that McCain's performance (which was better than I expected) is indicative of cheating? The problem isn't even the cheating. It's that McCain broke the rules by not showing up on time, regardless of whether he benefited from that violation, then responded to Rev. Warren's comments in a way that implied he'd followed the rules. People fail standardized tests for the appearance of impropriety, people lose licenses for the appearance of impropriety, and McCain should have to explain his appearance of impropriety.

De Montfort said...

I guess a nerve was touched, Rick Davis asked for a meeting with the head of NBC news to protest Andrea Mitchell's comment on this on MTP as an example of partisan bias.

John Nail said...

Mule - do you play golf? In golf rules are abided by the player..

Rules are rules and he broke them opening up the question of veracity that at best soils his performance....if he really was that good he takes a huge hit, if not and can be proven his campaign is over...we've seen the lies already and his gaffes and it is hard to believe the POW still exists inside McCain.

ty said...

Going back a few posts to overrated at the top of this page, you say:

"Worse yet, Obama has moved around without any real roots. Who is this guy? He attended a politically divisive church for 20yrs and had his kids baptised at the same church."

Don't you see how those two statements, that Obama is rootless and that Obama attended the same church for 20 years, might be a wee bit contradictory? Perhaps you should consider, you know, choosing a negative message and sticking with it.

Mason said...

I think we're all missing a much simpler lie here:

Pastor Warren said there was a coin toss.
1) If McCain was late in arriving, how do you have a coin toss with a candidate that's not there? Surrogates or advance-men?
2) Even if you hold a coin toss, what if the result says that the absent candidate will go first? Now you're really in a bind.

I doubt there was a coin toss at all. You'd have to be nuts to leave it to chance. There's no way you'll take a 50% probability that the coin will tell you to send up the guy that isn't there. In prime time, no less...

ty said...

mason: They had announced the results of the coin toss in news stories earlier on Saturday. I don't know precisely when it was performed, but I know it was at least a few hours before the event. If McCain's lateness was intentional, it was with the knowledge he would be going second.

Mule Rider said...

John Nail,

"Rules are rules"? So where was the official rule on this one? In Section F, Paragraph 14, Sub-Paragraph D, Sub-Section 2-A?

I didn't know it was such a hard-core contractually binding document they were following. What are these rules you speak of?

The only "rule" was that each was given minimal amounts of "prepatory information" but neither was supposed to be privied to the specific line of questioning and hear anything detailed beforehand.

Whether McCain was in a motorcade, a green room/cone of silence, or on one of Neptune's moons for any or all of the time before appearing on stage, the only RULE is whether or not he was able to prepare for anything ahead of time he wasn't supposed to.

If he didn't have access to anything, he didn't break any rules.

You just want to use anything and everything to castigate the man. This story fits the bill because it was a discussion in a hostile environment for Obama and McCain was generally agreed to have come away more unscathed in the end.

Once again, fill me in on these hard core rules you speak of.

Mason said...

Ty:
Makes sense.

Mason said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Mule Rider said...

Can we all agree on just one thing? This was just a publicity stunt.

Since Rick Warren is supposedly friends with both of these guys, is it not plausible that all of this was nothing more than for:

1) John McCain to have a forum to repeat the socially conservative stump lines straight out of the Republican playbook.

2) Barack Obama to have at least casual access to the evangelical crowd to at least articulate some of his ideals and mitigate any concerns about him being a neophyte and/or liberal (or, God forbid, anybody there still thinking he's an extremist Muslim sympathizer).

Both did that. They did well at what the forum was presented for them to do. Barack Obama didn't offer anything to really "win over" evangelical voters, but he certainly didn't come across as scary...

McCain got to recite the same old stuff. Nothing new or innovative. He just articulated it readily and fluently. Nothing unexpected in front of a crowd that's heavily sympathetic to those ideas.

No reason this has to be some grand conspiracy full of "cheating."

Sedi said...

Darren,
Violations of stated rules of the game (in this case, as set by Warren) bother me. I think that they bother most Americans, though I agree with your assessment that this will likely make little impact. My reaction was not as an analyst of the politics or as an Obama supporter, but as an American. We believe in rules that are agreed upon ahead of time and are mutually acceptable. Our nation was founded on rules, and adherence to the rule of law. Gore, despite receiving more votes than Bush (nationally), accepted the Supreme Court's ruling and his loss in FL because of respect for the rules of the game.

It's entirely possible than McCain is free from blame, if Warren didn't make the rules explicit enough. But one of the two made a mistake and misled the viewing public. It isn't the end of the world, but it also isn't nothing.

hillaryclinton4barackobama said...

Oh poor jack black ... It looks like you are one of the "few" [sic] people who DID NOT get Sen. Obama's "pay grade" comment ...

In your haste to find something to confront the senator with you FAILED to grasp that he was talking about "someone higher than him", someone some refer to as GOD. He , Mr. Obama, was NOT at the level to state unequivocally that life begins at conception because HE IS NOT GOD ...

Stop taking things Sen. Obama says literally because the man is a highly INTELLECTUAL body who makes statements requiring more cranial activity than a regular person like you and I (even though I understood what he meant ) ...

hillaryclinton4barackobama said...

On a side note, I could have taken the McCain "$5 million to be rich" statement and mangled it to prove he was out of touch with reality BUT childish as that statement may have been I got that he was just joking ...

Tim said...

Most importantly, does John McCain get to LIE, CHEAT AND STEAL with the caveat he is a POW? That old line is getting tired considering his role in the Savings and Loan scandals, and the cheating on his wife and all the other LYING AND CHEATING he has done throughout his long senate career.

I don't want a President who nukes some country because he has unresolved anger from being a POW!

Sedi said...

"I could have taken the McCain "$5 million to be rich" statement and mangled it to prove he was out of touch with reality BUT childish as that statement may have been I got that he was just joking ..."

He was joking? I didn't watch the debate, but the things I've read certainly didn't suggest that he was joking. Reading it in the context of the his whole answer made it seem like he was serious, but that he realized that he had made a mistake right after he said it. That is how Politico is reporting it, and they certainly aren't known for being lefties...

Mike in Maryland said...

Virginia Conservative said...
BTW, PUMA is a really stupid ass term

For your information, the technically correct way to spell it is P.U.M.A., per their website:
http://www.puma08.com/tag/clinton/

And it stands for "Party Unity My Ass"

If you didn't know the above, it shows how VERY little you understand about politics and the 2008 campaign.

ROOKIE!!

Mike

pluckon said...

What, you mean to tell me that a megachurch pastor and a right-wing Republican presidential candidate would conspire to LIE? I am shocked, just shocked.

Don said...

Read the "Justices" excerpt from the transcript. Line 13 seems to the first mention of supreme court justices in the transcript.

9 DEFINE MARRIAGE.
10 A UNION -- A UNION BETWEEN MAN AND WOMAN, BETWEEN
11 ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN, THAT'S MY DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.
12 ARE WE GOING TO GET BACK TO THE IMPORTANCE OF SUPREME
13 COURT JUSTICES.
14 Q WE'LL GET TO THAT.
15 A ALL RIGHT. OKAY.
16 Q YOU GOT ALL MY QUESTIONS, GOOD.

Just saying...

MacDaffy said...

This is very simple: If John McCain wasn't in "The Cone Of Silence" when Rick Warren began his interview with Barack Obama, then he is guilty of misleading Senator Obama, his church, and those viewing or listening at home.

We were led to believe that McCain was in the building and under Warren's control when he began interviewing Senator Obama. McCain may not have or know how to use an iPhone, but someone in his entourage certainly does. Nothing kept the McCain camp from receiving emailed or texted characterizations of the questions asked from the venue, either backstage or in the audience or from a monitor elsewhere.

Obama acquitted himself well during the forum. McCain gave canned, pat, stump speech answers throughout. The fact that McCain's performance in the forum--pro or con--is the issue means that Obama walked away with a win.

But Nate raises questions of basic honesty and fairness with his allegations. Thanks for doing it.

MacDaffy said...

This is very simple: If John McCain wasn't in "The Cone Of Silence" when Rick Warren began his interview with Barack Obama, then he is guilty of misleading Senator Obama, his church, and those viewing or listening at home.

We were led to believe that McCain was in the building and under Warren's control when he began interviewing Senator Obama. McCain may not have or know how to use an iPhone, but someone in his entourage certainly does. Nothing kept the McCain camp from receiving emailed or texted characterizations of the questions asked from the venue, either backstage or in the audience or from a monitor elsewhere.

Obama acquitted himself well during the forum. McCain gave canned, pat, stump speech answers throughout. The fact that McCain's performance in the forum--pro or con--is the issue means that Obama walked away with a win.

But Nate raises questions of basic honesty and fairness with his allegations. Thanks for doing it.

Carlos Echevarria said...

Why doesn't your "Messiah" just accept the townhall debates he promised he would???

We could clear this all up or is that decision "above his pay grade", as well???

B. Hussein Soetoro is a coward, a liar and a radical socialist...

Citizen Grim said...

"If McCain was in the motorcade, then there would be absolutely nothing, other than his honor, that would prevent him from hearing Obama's questions."

Oh. So it's settled then? Because McCain's honor would seem to be higher than most.

Page Notes said...

PROPOSED PROJECT: REFUTING MCCAIN'S CONE OF SILENCE
NEEDED MATERIALS: (a) a copy of the Saddleback forum, (b) voice-stress analysis software, and (c) software clocking devices.

PURPOSE: If McCain did profit from information about the first half of Obama's interview, then McCain's responses would be noticeably different in the second half of his own interview. (I'm including the possibility here that McCain may have received advice over his cell phone from advisors who were watching the Obama interview.)

WHAT TO LOOK FOR:

1. Evidence of not telling the truth. The initial interaction between McCain and Pastor Warren provides a suitable calibration point, as they both knew McCain had not kept his commitment to remain in the "cone of silence" during Obama's interview. Visible difference in stress levels between the first and second halves could be an indication of hanky panky regarding the first half.

2. Quicker response times during the first half. I was particularly struck by McCain's NEGATIVE response times in some cases, where he couldn't even wait until the question had been posed. I believe all of these occurred during the first half.

3. Shorter answers interspersed with premeditated anecdotes during the first half.

4. More logical "gap" time in the second half, where McCain has to think in order to produce a thoughtful answer, because he doesn't already know the answer.

WHAT TO DO WITH THE INFORMATION: Report the results ASAP to truthfightsback.com.

- Jim Williams
jgwilliams@mindspring.com

Will Walker said...

If the Times has picked this up, it should hit the nightly news. It really is a blow to McCain's so-called character--which makes it news.

McCain wants to make this election about Obama because he loses on all the major policy issues. If the spotlight turns to show McCain as the little man I believe he has acted as during this election, the Dems will walk into the white house no problem.

Higglytown said...

This thing is going on 250 comments. That is amazing. This was not an actual debate. If you watched when Warren announced the "Cone of Silence" it was to thunderous laughter both by him and the crowd. Same thing when he reannounced it. The crowd and most of the world didnt take it that seriously. Its not like a regular debate. Obama answered the questions. Later McCain answered the questions. McCain seemed more prepared and relaxed, but then again he was in a southern baptist church, the kind he attends regularly in Phoenix, and far from the UCC Black Liberation Theology type of religion Obama was used to.

This insane drivel about cheating is only going to help McCain. It just isnt a big deal to anyone but the left ideologues, and there is no solid proof it even occured, just guesswork based on performance from someone that was at home in that situation.

Higglytown said...

Frankly, I would be impressed by the McCain teams ability if they did cheat. It means he was able to not only get the questions ahead of time, but prepare detailed precise on point answers, memorize these, and go in noteless and answer every single question correctly and in exact phraseology that had been prepared and memorized during the 15 minutes he had before going on stage.

If this is true, age will never be an issue. He is sharper and has better control that Obama on fact retention and speech control, given only 15 minutes of prep time.

Higglytown said...

At least McCain didnt answer any question that the answer was "above my paygrade" because you know Senators who make the law, do not have to wrestle with the question of when life begins. Its going to stay above his paygrade, because any sensible person would not put someone in as a president who cannot honestly answer his belief on a very specific question and issue.

ldb said...

What about the fact that on education he answered questions before they were asked and the part we he said, 'aren't you going to ask me about the supreme court?'
From the number of people who watched who felt that McCain knew the questions in advance.. it was based on how he answered as if he was rattling off the answers he jsut memorized... if you leave out the dumb stories he told.

Jerry said...

Could someone answer just one question for me?
Before Warren asked the question McCain wanted to "go back to the Supreme court issue", at which point Warren moved quickly back to what he had asked.
Now riddle me this Batman; if you do not know the question before hand how can you want to "go back" to a question yet asked?

hidden-soul said...

The Pastor Lied. When he said, "WE HAVE SAFELY PLACED SENATOR MCCAIN IN A CONE OF SILENCE" he knew he had no idea where McCain was. The Pastor must be dizzy with all the spinning he's been doing lately.

Clifton X said...

Rev. Warren lied to his church and the people of this country about the rules of the question and answer session.

sex said...

免費視訊聊天
辣妹視訊
視訊交友網
美女視訊
視訊交友
視訊交友90739
成人聊天室
視訊聊天室
視訊聊天
視訊聊天室
情色視訊
情人視訊網
視訊美女

一葉情貼圖片區
免費視訊聊天室
免費視訊

色情遊戲
寄情築園小遊戲
情色文學
一葉情貼圖片區
情境坊歡愉用品
情惑用品性易購
情人視訊網
辣妹視訊
情色交友

成人論壇
情色論壇
愛情公寓
情色
舊情人
情色貼圖
色情聊天室
色情小說
做愛
做愛影片
性愛

情境坊歡愉用品
情惑用品性易購
aio交友愛情館
一葉情貼圖片區

信次 said...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,美國aneros,rudeboy,英國rudeboy,英國Rocksoff,德國Fun Factory,Fun Factory,英國甜筒造型按摩座,甜筒造型按摩座,英國Rock Chic ,瑞典 Lelo ,英國Emotional Bliss,英國 E.B,荷蘭 Natural Contours,荷蘭 N C,美國 OhMiBod,美國 OMB,Naughti Nano ,音樂按摩棒,ipod按摩棒,美國 The Screaming O,美國TSO,美國TOPCO,美國Doc Johnson,美國CA Exotic,美國CEN,美國Nasstoy,美國Tonguejoy,英國Je Joue,美國Pipe Dream,美國California Exotic,美國NassToys,美國Vibropod,美國Penthouse,仿真按摩棒,矽膠按摩棒,猛男倒模,真人倒模,仿真倒模,PJUR,Zestra,適趣液,穿戴套具,日本NPG,雙頭龍,FANCARNAL,日本NIPPORI,日本GEL,日本Aqua Style,美國WET,費洛蒙,費洛蒙香水,仿真名器,av女優,打炮,做愛,性愛,口交,吹喇叭,肛交,魔女訓練大師,無線跳蛋,有線跳蛋,震動棒,震動保險套,震動套,TOY-情趣用品,情趣用品網,情趣購物網,成人用品網,情趣用品討論,成人購物網,鎖精套,鎖精環,持久環,持久套,拉珠,逼真按摩棒,名器,超名器,逼真老二,電動自慰,自慰,打手槍,仿真女郎,SM道具,SM,性感內褲,仿真按摩棒,pornograph,hunter系列,h動畫,成人動畫,成人卡通,情色動畫,情色卡通,色情動畫,色情卡通,無修正,禁斷,人妻,極悪調教,姦淫,近親相姦,顏射,盜攝,偷拍,本土自拍,素人自拍,公園露出,街道露出,野外露出,誘姦,迷姦,輪姦,凌辱,痴漢,痴女,素人娘,中出,巨乳,調教,潮吹,av,a片,成人影片,成人影音,線上影片,成人光碟,成人無碼,成人dvd,情色影音,情色影片,情色dvd,情色光碟,航空版,薄碼,色情dvd,色情影音,色情光碟,線上A片,免費A片,A片下載,成人電影,色情電影,TOKYO HOT,SKY ANGEL,一本道,SOD,S1,ALICE JAPAN,皇冠系列,老虎系列,東京熱,亞熱,武士系列,新潮館,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套,G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,生日精品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票號碼,夜市,統一發票對獎,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解,av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情, 股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上掃毒,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,火車,房屋,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套, G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,精品,禮品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票,夜市,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解, av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av ,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情,股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上a片,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,借錢,房屋,街頭籃球,找工作,旅行社,六合彩,整型,整型,珠海,雷射溶脂,婚紗,網頁設計,水噹噹,台中隆鼻,果凍隆乳,改運整型,自體脂肪移植,新娘造型,婚禮顧問,下川島,常平,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼, 婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,白蟻,白蟻,除蟲,老鼠,減肥,減肥,在家工作,在家工作,婚友,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友,交友,交友,婚友社,婚友社,婚友社,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,越南新娘,外籍新娘,外籍新娘,台中坐月子中心,搬家公司,搬家公司,中和搬家,台北搬家,板橋搬家,新店搬家,線上客服,網頁設計,線上客服,網頁設計,植牙,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,交友,越南新娘,婚友社,外籍新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,交友,外籍新娘,視訊聊天,大陸新娘,婚友社,婚友,越南新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,視訊交友,外籍新娘,網路排名,網路排名軟體,網站排名優化大師,關鍵字排名大師,網站排名seo大師,關鍵字行銷專家,關鍵字,seo,關鍵字行銷,網頁排序,網頁排名,關鍵字大師,seo大,自然排名,網站排序,網路行銷創業,汽車借款,汽車借錢,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,拉皮,抽脂,近視雷射,隆乳,隆鼻,變性,雙眼皮,眼袋,牙齒,下巴,植牙,人工植牙,植髮,雷射美容,膠原蛋白,皮膚科,醫學美容,玻尿酸,肉毒桿菌,微晶瓷,電波拉皮,脈衝光,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,借錢,借貸,當舖,借款,借貸,借錢,週轉,學英文,英文社團,英語俱樂部,學習英文,英語會話,英文演講,English Club,學英語,學英文,美語社團,英語社團,英文讀書會,Toastmasters,Toastmaster,英語讀書會,拍樂得批發,拍樂得飾品,拍樂得化妝品批發,

平平 said...

^^ nice blog!! ^@^

徵信, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,

徵信, 外遇, 離婚, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 征信, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,

平平 said...

^^ very nice

徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,

mood said...

フランチャイズ
コンタクトレンズ
インプラント

会社設立
ショッピング枠 現金化
お見合い
グループウェア
電報
矯正歯科
格安航空券
網頁設計
ウィークリーマンション

クレジットカード 現金化
キャッシング
ダンボール
水 通販