8.20.2008

Biden: A New Trick for Old Fogeys

Yesterday, I argued that Joe Biden is not an especially popular politician, and would start out with an unusually high number of unfavorables for a VP selection, almost all of whom have been either relatively unknown at the time of their selection (allowing the campaign to build a favorable narrative around them), or almost universally well-liked to begin with.

However, Biden's case is probably stronger than I indicated, because he tends to be most popular among voting groups with a lot of undecided voters, which means a lot of persuadables. In particular, Biden's strength with senior citizens could be a real asset. How so? Because seniors are far more likely to be undecided in this election than their younger counterparts.

Below, I have averaged the Gallup national tracker crosstabs by age over the course of the last three weeks. The only thing I am interested in is the number of voters who are not committed to either Obama or McCain (either truly undecided or claiming that they'll vote third-party). This is how that vote breaks down by age group:

18-29     9% undecided/other
30-49 9% undecided/other
50-64 10% undecided/other
65+ 16% undecided/other
Seniors are about 50 percent more likely than other voters to be uncommitted at this point in the race. Voters aged 65+ will eventually represent about 20 percent of the electorate, but they may represent more like 30 percent of the pool of persuadables.

Now, what did Joe Biden's favorables look like in that recent Rasumussen poll?
VF = Very Favorable
SF = Somewhat Favorable
SU = Somewhat Unfavorable
VU = Very Unfavorable

Age VF + SF = Favorable SU + VU = Unfavorable
18-29 3 + 26 = 29 14 + 8 = 22 (+7)
30-39 4 + 19 = 23 17 + 16 = 33 (-10)
40-49 8 + 19 = 27 22 + 18 = 30 (-3)
50-64 19 + 24 = 43 19 + 18 = 37 (+6)
65+ 21 + 24 = 45 12 + 21 = 35 (+10)
That is a pretty strong age-based correlation. The only figure that breaks the pattern is Biden's relatively strong performance among 18-29 year olds, but that is probably because that cohort is so overwhelmingly Democratic at the moment that they are likely to support any Democrat.

Biden's net favorable score among seniors was the highest of any Democrat that Rasmussen tested, except for John Edwards, who has since disqualified himself:
Edwards    +21
Biden +10
Clinton +8
Kaine +1
Webb 0
Sebelius -1
Bayh -6
Hagel -9
What a Biden pick really would be is a redux of Gore-Lieberman. Al Gore got quite a large bounce in Florida when he selected Lieberman, and if Obama were to pick Biden, he is probably committed to playing Florida out to the end, or at least until the last 15 days of the campaign.

*-*

By the way -- I wouldn't read too much into Biden's "I'm not the guy" statement because his demeanor seemed to be pretty sarcastic and jocular. Then again, assuming it was an unplanned joke, his statement couldn't have gone over too well with the Obama campaign. Hell, if they were really evil, they could have told all the candidates they weren't the one and then saw who leaked or broke their game face.

In any event, based on my 99.99% uninformed aggregation of information and intuition, I'd probably place the candidates into something like the following tiers:

1. Biden, Kaine
2. Sebelius, Clinton
3. Bayh, Reed, Other

76 comments

Nick said...

Sebelius, you heard it here first!

Jack said...

The Oracle tells you exactly what you need to hear.

And remember, there is no spoon.

Smitty said...

Another Matrix fan!

We will know the name of the VP in a few days. The suspense is fun...like being a child waiting for that special birthday gift. Will it be the one we really, really want?

Michael said...

I certainly have no inside knowledge of who Obama plans on choosing, but Biden would surprise me, because he's been in the Senate for decades and has a mixed record, including the fact that he supported the Iraq war and recently made the bizarre statement that the recent fighting in Georgia was the most important event in Europe since the fall of Communism. (The turmoil and mass killing in ex-Yugoslavia after the death of Tito wasn't more important and, for that matter, more obviously in Europe?) To put it bluntly, he's an establishment Washington Democrat (his commute from Wilmington is not relevant except to his constituents) who can be construed to represent everything that's been wrong with Congress as an institution.

Choosing Biden would contradict Obama's theme of new politics. I could more easily see him being nominated for Secretary of State or U.N. Rep in an Obama administration, if one indeed eventuates.

I expect Obama to pick someone for VP who can be construed in some way to represent a "new" politics, either because s/he's relatively young, has been proven to have appeal in what are STILL thought of as traditionally Republican states (e.g., Schweitzer, Sebelius, Bayh), or/and has some kind of innovative ideas s/he will promote. Because of Biden's long record as a not particularly visionary establishment Democrat, he would be justly made to share the blame for all the failings of the institutional Democratic party in the Senate. I believe that even Gore, despite his baggage, could more easily represent himself as someone who is engaging in new thinking and was an innovator ahead of his time than Biden. And Gore is over 5 years younger!

clarkejeffrey said...

I'm getting nervous about the idea of putting a "foreign policy" guy on the ticket. I don't want the central issue of the campaign to be foreign policy. If we do that we're fighting on their turf. We need to make the central issue the economy and keep talking about it.

We've fallen into the trap of letting them set the agenda.

Its the economy stupid!!

Stick to it.

clarkejeffrey said...
This post has been removed by the author.
pluckon said...

I've got to say that the data on the old folks is persuasive. Thanks, Nate. It's always useful to have some facts.

hosertohoosier said...

Today we are going to learn how to play veepstakes.

1. Pick a candidate at random.

2. Put together a list of adjectives that describe the candidate.

3. Claim that people sharing those adjectives will be more likely to vote for the candidate.

4. Take a look at what state the candidate is from. Is it a swing or lean state? If so, the candidate can win it. If not, point out that historically the effect of VP's on swing states has been small.

5. Picture the candidate in a tank, then picture the candidate wearing a hard hat, while visiting a steel mill. Which of these images appeals most to do? If you said tank, then the candidate is strong on national defence. If you said hard hat, the candidate is strong on the economy. CEO's are automatically strong on the economy, while veterans are automatically strong on defence.

6. The next part is tricky. Is your veepstake selection more similar to the presidential candidate or more different. If similar, then the VP will increase the salience of key issues. If different, then the VP will make up for strengths. If neither, think of an issue they might have mentioned. They are now strong on that issue.

7. Are they a congressman? They have Washington experience. Governor? They have executive experience. Political outsider? They are a fresh face who can clean up Washington. Or VP/first lady? They will guarantee a victory, unless they don't.

8. Finally, we have ideology. Centrists are smart picks aimed at increasing appeal to independents. Hardliners are smart picks aimed at appeasing the base.

Worried that your analysis might be crap? Don't be. VP's don't matter anyway, so it would be hard for you to be proven wrong.

What if somebody points out that the candidate you suggested is horrible, and has reasons that lie outside this handy guidebook? That probably won't happen. The common form of Veepstake argumentation is to say "no it won't" to all suggested positives, while asserting different positives for a different candidate. Sometimes it may help to just assert positive qualities for your preferred candidate. In Veepstakes the longer list of positive traits generally trumps any shorter list, even if that list is more accurate or contains salient things.

Still confused? Lets try an example.

John McCain should run with... Paris Hilton.

Paris Hilton is...
* Young
* Hot
* White
* Rich
* Female

So she helps limit Obama's lead among attractive young voters (random aside but did anybody else notice that Huckabee rallies were absolute dogshows). White voters are about 80% of the electorate, so that's always good. Rich people vote more than poor people. Oh and she is a female, so she will appeal to Clinton supporters.

Hilton's home-state is California or New York. Not a swing state. However, that doesn't matter. Vice presidential candidates have rarely made a difference in modern history.

Probably in the course of the Simple Life, Paris Hilton wore a hard hat, but I would reckon it didn't suit her. However I do recall Paris Hilton mentioning energy policy once, and she often says "that's hot", so she is an expert on energy policy and climate change.

Paris Hilton is a fresh face who can bring a new era of politics to Washington. She is not a hardline ideologue, which will appeal to centrist voters. As we all know, centrists are more numerous than extremists. Moreover, Paris Hilton will help compensate for McCain's weakness in not being a celebrity, or being hot.

And now for some random assertions. Paris Hilton has more name recognition than other VP contenders. This will be a good thing in case voters forget McCain's name. The key demographic in the next election will be people who vote for the first candidate whose name they can remember (so Florida will be a swing state).

Paris Hilton is blonde. There has never been a blonde vice-president since the onset of colour television. Thus, Paris Hilton would make history.

No VP candidate that likes to carry around small dogs in a purse has ever lost an election.

Paris Hilton is ineligible because of her age? That is a fair point, but it doesn't refute the long list of reasons I have presented. I have like 12 points, while you have just one point of criticism. Lets determine who wins this argument.

12 positives - 1 negative = 11 positives. McCain-Hilton '08.

clarkejeffrey said...

Nate,

Have you done a study about how demographics have changed in the last four years and if everybody could vote again what the margin would be if every living person voted the same way they did four years ago and Kerry got new 18-22 voters by say 20 points?

I know this is morbid to think of it this way but...the preboomer generation is one of the most conservative generations in the last century.

Bush won 60 and older voters by 7 points. Since he won 45-59 by only 2 and what I know about older boomers vs preboomers, my guess is he won the 70+ demographic by well over 10 points.

You see where I'm going. A lot of Republicans have died in the last 4years. A lot of new Democrats have turned 18.

I know people tend to think all early 20s are always liberal and all older voters are always conservative but that isn't really true.

Take a look at the 1988 election. You see that youths were actually more Rep than seniors. The preboomer generation (at this point 45-59) really jumps out at you here.

http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/elections/how_groups_voted/voted_88.html

Obviously things change throughout people's lives, but certain generations are just different than others and to a certain extent, people keep the values of their youth throughout their entire lives.

The fact is one of the most Republican generations is dying at the same time one of the most Democratic is turning 18.

This will probably have big implications over the next 25 years.

I figure that if everybody gets 12 elections as an adult, then the people that died would represent 8.33% of the vote. If you replace a R+10 subgroup with a D+20 subgroup and the subgroup represents 8.33% of the population, then you have caused a 2.5% shift in the overall population.

In other words, demographics changes alone might have wiped out Bush's entire 2004 margin and if we had the election again, Kerry would win the popular vote by 0.1%.

Assuming that today's 14 year olds turn out to be as liberal as their 18 year old siblings, the 2012 election would be a fairly comfortable Kerry win.

Obviously, people are also shifting and some Bush people will be voting for Obama. Some Kerry people will be voting for McCain. Some 2004 voters will stay home. Some eligible 2004 nonvoters will show up. Not everybody that died in the last 4 years was a preboomer, etc etc.

The fact is there is a big demographic change going on.

I believe that a major reason for the Republican success over the last 20 years occured when the FDR seniors started to die as the Reagan youth started to come of age in the late 70s and 80s.

The demographics are definitely shifting back.

Smitty said...

Interesting post, clarkejeffery.

DarienCrow said...

Hmmm...

Wondering why the electoral map is not reflecting the true numbers.

As marked it should read:

Obama: 264
McCain 265

That's if you honestly think that the polls are showing Colorado as dead even which is going against all other sites that show McCain as leading now.

I get the feeling this site is publishing an "outlier".

Smitty said...

Nate uses earlier polls at a lesser weight in his projections. Earlier polls were higher for Obama.

That said, in the previous post regarding polls for 8/19, Nate wrote this:

"It was another fairly bad polling day for Barack Obama, and we are getting to the point where it would be hard to describe the election as anything other than 'too close to call'."

hosertohoosier said...

There is definitely some generational change going on, but I think, clarkejeffrey, you are missing the polarization that has benefited McCain.

In 2000 there were no age cleavages (check the exit polls on CNN), and insofar as there were, Gore did well among seniors.

Gore-Bush 2000

18-29: 48-46
30-44: 48-49
45-59: 48-49
60+: 51-47

In 2004 there were bigger cleavages, but they were still not huge (though there had been an 11 point swing to Bush among seniors).

Kerry-Bush 2004

18-29: 55-44
30-44: 47-51
45-59: 49-49
60+: 46-53

Yes, generally more Dem-leaning young people are entering the electorate, while GOP-leaning seniors are dying. At the same time though, those seniors still living are backing McCain in even bigger numbers.

In Quinnipiac's latest poll (which has age cross-tabs) it was...

Obama-McCain:

18-34: 55-36
35-54: 49-41
55+: 40-47

Now that poll had Obama up by 5, versus Bush beating Kerry by 2.5. So, getting rid of an average nation-wide swing of 7.5 to Obama (according to this poll), it looks like:

Obama-McCain:

18-34: 47.5-43.5
35-54: 41.5-48.5
55+: 32.5-54.5

Obama is doing better than Kerry because of a general swing to the Dems. Young voters are less overwhelmingly Dem-leaning than before - they just happen to be voting in a bad election year for the GOP. Likewise, middle-aged voters and seniors are increasingly GOP-leaning, it just happens to be a crappy year to wear a Republican pin.

Alex S. said...

@ clarkejeffrey

Good post! I have also thought about this. The next generation of voters is likely to be a "democratic" generation whereas the old Eisenhower-republicans, the cold-war warriors, are dying. On the other hand, the democratic Kennedy/Johnson ´68 generation is now getting old and slowly slipping out of the polticial landscape (Clinton/Gore as they archetypes of this generation). The next generation however, being in its "best years" right now is a republican generation that came to power with Nixon/Reagan (historians arent sure). Reagan still evokes nostalgic feelings in people that were young back then and are now in their 40s-50s.
Luckily for Republicans, Bill Clinton´s moral failures prevented him from becoming a similar symbol for the next generation, and it´s up to Obama to give these demographically disadvantaged younger voters (18-35) the kind of voice that Gore and Kerry couldn´t.

Strategically, it would make perfect sense to forge a coalition between the old civil rights/feminist/black movement and the current internet/globalized generation (and get a few Clinton voters on the way).

davelondon said...

The BBC US Corespondent has called the VPs

Biden and Ridge

clarkejeffrey said...

Hoser,

I think we could get into a chicken-egg debate here. You say the young numbers look bad for Reps because its a Dem year. I say its a Dem year because the young numbers look bad for Reps. I guess we could go on and on about this without resolution.

There is no doubt that it is a Dem year and at least as it stands now, more Bush voters are planning on voting for Obama than Kerry voters planning on voting for McCain. Of course that could change. Still I think the Demographic shift is part of the cause. Definitely not a full 7.5%. Probably not even the 2.5% that I mentioned earlier, but a statistically significant one in a closely divided electorate.

Lets just assume that it is the 2.5% that I mentioned earlier, then that means that the actual Dem lean for this year vs. 2004 is about 5%.

I noticed that you actually really overcorrected. You said the lean was 7.5% but you double counted it.

If you lean adjust at 5%, you see Obama up
18-34 +14
35-54: +3
55+: -12

There is definitely an age gap. I actually think that a large part of it might be the personal characteristics of these two candidates. Obama is far younger than McCain and they definitely act like they are from different generations. If thats true, it will disappear the next time if the Dems go with an older person and the Reps go young.

However, I think a large part of it is also the various principles that the parties espouse. Young people seem much more interested in preventing climate change than preventing gay marraige.

You could make a reasonable case that voters always remember the first bad presidency of their adult lives. If a voter turns 18 during a bad presidency and its followed by a relatively successful one, they will always be voting for the successful party for the rest of their lives. Herbert Hoover was brought up for decades by some people. Republicans keep claiming that Obama will bring back the Jimmy Carter days. That argument might work on a 50 year old, who turned 18 in 1976 but you might as well tell today's 22 year old that he will bring back the Hoover days. He will remember the George W Bush days for quite some time. When he is 50, he might still be voting for Dems because of it.

Stephen C. Rose said...

Yesterday Biden said I'm not the guy. I think he was telling the truth. Schweitzer is not out yet.

Adam in NY said...

Battleground National Poll by Terrance Group

McCain 47
Obama 46

http://www.tarrance.com/082008/Battleground-35-charts.pdf

clarkejeffrey said...

On the other hand, the democratic Kennedy/Johnson ´68 generation is now getting old and slowly slipping out of the polticial landscape

They have another 20 years or so.

The problem is that people are still so conflicted on Johnson. Was he the one that signed the civil rights act and got reelected in an enormous popular vote landslide or the one that led us into Vietnam and had to drop out in 68? Probably still the latter. I think enough people that were young at the time remember the promise of the Kennedy administration and try to forget LBJ.

History never repeats itself exactly, but you could argue following events.

Party holds office long time with relatively few interruptions.

President becomes reasonably but not entirely unpopular

Other party nominates unabashed pragmatist, that isn't completely trusted even within his own party.

Pragmatist has successful presidency but it ends in scandal.

VP runs for his own term and is sort of confused as to whether to emphasize the success of the previous administration or hide from the scandal.

Other party's candidate slides by in close election by emphasizing how scandal free he is.

Once president, he appears totally incompetent and becomes extremely unpopular.

Other party nominates the idealistic candidate they always wanted. This candidate has a lot of charisma but hasn't really ever compromised the party's core principles. Unpopular incumbent party tries to emphasize challenger's "extremism" with some success. However challenger's charisma and laid back manner stops the extremist charges from seeming to believable. Race stays close till the end, when undecideds decide any change would be better than the current course and break overwhelmingly for the challenger.

Did I just describe the history of
Johnson-Nixon-Ford-Carter-Reagan

or

Bush-Clinton-Gore-Bush II-Obama

The parallels are kind of eerie.

Adam in NY said...

New Reuters/Zogby Poll.

***McCain leads by 5***

McCain 46
Obama 41

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUKN1948672420080820?sp=true

clarkejeffrey said...

Oh and if I wanted to take the analogy further I could point out..

Both Johnson and Bush I were accomplished men that were picked to serve as VP for presidents that represented completely opposite wings of their parties.

While both Johnson and Bush I were extremely popular and had significant successes early in their terms, they never completely escaped their predecessors' shadows. Once their presidencies got into trouble, their base deserted them.

someperson718 said...

We are all leaning towards Biden but truthfully, noone freaking knows.

pluckon said...

Have you done a study about how demographics have changed in the last four years and if everybody could vote again what the margin would be if every living person voted the same way they did four years ago and Kerry got new 18-22 voters by say 20 points?

That question is based on the false premise that there'll be a big rise in youth turnout this year. That's unlikely when you actually take a closer look.

There are two distinct youth votes. One is collegiate youth, whose turnout rose massively between 2000 and 2004 as the result of big turnout-boosting efforts by the Democrats. In '04, collegiate turnout rose from significantly below the national average to the mid-70% level because of those get-out-the-vote drives.

Non-collegiate turnout is a different story. It remained at about 35%. This is not surprising, because non-collegiate youth, in general, don't read the newspaper, and don't watch TV news. If they're employed, they're employed in a couple of jobs, not making squat. They are virtually immune from political appeals, or at least from the political appeals that you see these days.

If the Democrats wanted this vote, and the vote of the disenfranchise in general, they could easily get it by promising to raise the minimum wage to $12 an hour (the inflation and productivity-adjusted rate from 1968), and promising to roll back FICA taxes on people earning that amount of money.

Forget about "social justice," because that's a dirty word in the Democratic Party these days. Just call it a cynical vote buying strategy. If the Democrats made that promise, they'd unlock 20 or 30 million new votes. Of course, to do this the Democratic Party would have to coordinate between its presidential and congressional wings, and more importantly, it would have to be interested in winning.

I frankly doubt that it's capable of either task. In the meantime, I think you can forget about a meaningful increase in youth turnout. It already happened in 2004. The task this year will be to keep it from falling, which given the failing Obama campaign could be a real possibility.

live renats said...

maybe sebelius can do an ohuruogu? (that's a 400m women's runner if you don't know your olympians).

Adam in NY said...

News Rasmussen Poll for Ohio shows McCain leading by 5 with leaners included.

The most discouraging number in the poll for Obama may be the fact that 51% of Ohio voters have an unfavorable opinion of the presumptive Democratic nominee. That figure includes 33% with a Very Unfavorable opinion, up six percent from a month ago.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/ohio/election_2008_ohio_presidential_election

Darío said...

Goodbye Barack.

Rich (vtslayer) said...

I read that a "friend of Joe Biden" says that "I'm not the guy" has been a standard Biden response to the VP question. I seem to recall him saying something similar a while back on one of the Sunday morning or cable news shows. I wouldn't read to much into it.

Alex S. said...

The new Ohio poll is at least a correction to Rasmussen´s -10 Obama outlier from last month. -5 is far more realistic I would guess.. But it remains the fact that Ohio voters will vote with their purse and the drilling issue, in my opinion, is the one that plays to Obama´s disadvantage there like nowhere else.

While the Terrance Group poll doesn´t seem terribly important to me (with leaners, margin of error etc....) the Reuters/Zogby is the first national poll that gets me worried.

Darío said...

And remember that Zogby is very democrat.

davelondon said...

@live renats

Why? Is she going to be drug tested?

colt9988 said...

Biden's nickname in DC is 20/20 Hindsight Joe. His whole elected life Senator Biden has given the impression of being a guy on top of things simply by waiting for the dust to settle and then piping up with his "I told people this would happen, if they had listened to me 6 months ago this could have been prevented". It works in Delaware but it won't work in mainstream America.

Orlando said...

@Darío

Nice showing of wishful thinking.

SarahLawrenceScott said...

When evaluating potential VP's via polling, I'd trust the very favorable/very unfavorable gap more than just the favorable/unfavorable gap. If a candidate picks someone persuadable voters mildly disapprove of, they probably don't vote based on it, but if they pick someone they despite, watch out!

On that basis, Biden's numbers area a lot more troubling. He's only even among seniors, and is down pretty severely among 30 - 49.

On the other hand, the numbers in either category are still pretty small; the 15-20% who rate Biden "very unfavorable" may be McCain die-hards.

Overrated said...

Wow! The Ohio and National Polls today are a bit amazing. As we approach the eve of the convention, we have the strongest confirm yet of a reversal. Obama best name a VP soon and hunker down to line up the delegates/base. The convention could get unruly. The press narrative could easily turn into "Obama is blowing this thing and Dems are in a panic."

Darío said...

I think he pick Hillary at the end.
It´s Ohio, stupid.

applecrispbetty said...

As a lifelong Democrat, I have to say that certain Democratic politicians come across to me as clowns. Ed Rendell is perhaps the best example of this. Joe Biden is another.

Darío said...

I don´t know that.
Obama nevwr win a poll from Rasmussen in Ohio but Rasmussen markets gives Obama 56% winning in Ohio.

live renats said...

As if your first comment wasn't dumb enough, 'davelondon', you managed to surpass it with your second. Please, we don't need Justin Webb's buttboys clogging up this site.

joel said...

Obama needs to make a surpise pick or he is done for. Once people develop a negative feeling for a politician it`s curtains.
If McCain wins it`s 4 more years of gridlock and war, but people are just to stupid to realize this.
I guess we need to see where this race goes after a debate, if Obama is not winning by then he is a goner.

paddynoons said...

I would wager that the additional "undecided" old timers are weak Democrats who have a tought time pulling the lever for a black guy... and a tough time voting for a Republican. Where they end up breaking will play a big role in determining the election outcome -- i.e., most return to the D fold = Obama blowout; splitting 50/50 = Obama narrow win; most break for McCain = McCain narrow win (and probably the biggest generational voting split in history).

Coincidentially, this is also probably the group most susceptible to negative advertising. So it's too bad Obama isn't using his cash advantage to define McCain but McCain is spending his resources to define Obama (a la 2004).

Sedi said...

Dario and Joel are right, Obama should concede tomorrow. One poll in August the week before the convention from a decidedly mediocre pollster shows McCain leading by 5. I can't imagine what could be a clearer sign that Obama is doomed than that. It would be unprecedented for polls to swing in one direction and then to later swing back in the other direction. This is clearly a sign that Obama is finished. Ignore those who say that Obama has been focused on building up his ground game and organization, not winning the media and ad wars. What good has organization ever done anybody? Personally, I'm going to go un-register to vote, since all hope is lost. All hail President McCain!

Adam in NY said...

Neither one should concede.

Why should they?

It's, ahem, a JUMP BALL .

:-)

Black Political Analysis said...

From what I've read in the past, older folks aren't necessarily drawn to an older candidate the way, say many female voters are drawn to a woman, or blacks to a black candidate (Michael Steele excepting, of course).

Also, why does Janet Napolitano's
name never come up? She's a popular, two-term Democratic governor from a red state (and would automatically put AZ in play)?

Foregone Conclusion said...

I think that supporters of both McCain and Obama will have to realise something - that their VPs will never completely satisfy everyone. They will always have faults. Biden's weaknesses have already been mentioned. What about Bayh's centrism, say, or Clinton's supposed calculation - or the fact that no-one other than politicos outside Kansas has heard of Sibelius? Or for the Republicans - what about the fact that Romney appears to be made of plastic? No VP pick is flawless (which doesn't mean that the candidates shouldn't pick the best one). I think that there will be a lot of heartburn from the respective bases, no matter who's picked.

live renats said...

Sedi, I hate to say it but you're right. Obama might as well go on one of these.

Virginia Conservative said...

If he picks Biden its almost too easy to attack. Bring up his grade inflation, his hair plugs, his plagarism, his big mouth, his weird statement about Indian accents in 7-11s. There are so many "Bidenisms" (oh, and there will be so many more by November!) its almost TOO easy.

LAT said...

Not trying to argue that the Zogby poll is no good simply because the numbers are not good for Obama. But like the LAT poll from yesterday the dramatic movement is all in the democratic side. Self identified democrats and liberals have abandoned Obama by the likes of 10%? My own read is not so different from one I read here a couple of days ago---for the past week and half we have been hearing how Hillary is taking away the nomination, how she vanquished him and on and on. so is this the noise? I found it very strange that while Obama's numbers with independents have grown (which is good) both polls have him down with his core demographics.
I guess the conventions will tell us (on the one hand the democrats bring the party together and on the other McCain gets branded as a republican with Cheney and Bush right there on the stage).

Virginia Conservative said...

Maybe certain Democrat loyalists are realizing its not too late to force a Hillary nomination. Maybe she will keep the VP spot open for the Pope of Hope.

LAT said...

come on VC that is exactly my point---not that the dems do not want Obama, but that a very vocal part of the Hillary group is doing everything it can to make sure Obama does not get to shore up his base and the media obliges. Why else would Hillary's brother be meeting with Fiorina in PA? and holding a fundraiser for McCain?

How about we all wait for the convention and see how it plays?

davelondon said...

tenants

Whats your problem with Justin Webb?

Whats your problem with buttboys? I assume it was a term of abuse?

To clarify I have never been in a relationship with Justin, actually I have never met him.

The only reason for my 1st post was that once you cut through all the analysis, when you continue to talk and talk and talk about something you overcopmplicate it hence the Kerry discussion. Thus as an outsider looking in the BBCs its definite is interesting.

In the same way that 2000 had a lot of noise and came down to a couple of states and all the noise in 04 came down to Ohio. In 08 I would guess it will come down to CO/NM/NV/VA - BO needing VA or 2 of the other 3.

Also if its wildly wrong it will be quite funny, Given the beebs love of BO.

2ndly - apologies I had you down for a brit and thus assumed you would know that Christine's Reputation is not squeky clean, and if you asked most brits they wouldnt equatwe her with winning golds but having the rules bent for her by officaldomland because she is quite good.

It was only lighthearted and not in any way meant to be serious.

live renats said...

Ohuruogu has never failed a drugs test. Don't confuse scattiness with 'cleanness'. You want drugs ceats go to www.Blonska.com...And nobody who's British and proud of it calls themselves a 'Brit', buttboy.
By the way, if you look at the tipping state graphic you'll see that Ohio is just as crucial this election as it ever has before. The other states are smokescreens as far as I'm concerned.

Bradley said...

Hell, if they were really evil, they could have told all the candidates they weren't the one and then saw who leaked or broke their game face.

Or, if they're really really evil, they could have told them all that they ARE the one . . . unless something happens that changes their minds and looked to how they acted.

davelondon said...

renants


You just keep on throwing out that abuse dont you?
FYI. I am proud to be British thanks, I am proud of where I cam from.

I have never heard anywhere the term Brit being linked with any kind of negativity towards britain, If you have I would be interested to hear where from.

Re tipping pint states it has in the last elections come down to a couple of states at most the rest solidfying towards a candidate is all I was saying as an example of the cutting through the hyperanalysis. I wasnt being absolutist, am just saying it will come down to a couple of states. My guess would be the above, other people think differently thats fine.

Re the golden Girl, yes there is a diffeence between scattiness and cheating absolutley with you British rules state -
1.A missed drug test is the same as a Positive drug test. ie a fail
2. missing 3 out of Comp random tests is a missed test.
3. A fail puts you out of Olympic comp forever
4. Christine is though very good, a possible gold when there arent many gold about for Brit track athletics and the potential face of 2012.
5. Christine ban overturned, rules are broken but no punishment.

The Greek sprinters didnt test positive but nobody believes them, why beleive christine, because we are british and a brits word is his/her bond and would never cheat apparently.

Notice you didnt clarify re your homophobia. Care to comment?

davelondon said...

renants


You just keep on throwing out that abuse dont you?
FYI. I am proud to be British thanks, I am proud of where I cam from.

I have never heard anywhere the term Brit being linked with any kind of negativity towards britain, If you have I would be interested to hear where from.

Re tipping pint states it has in the last elections come down to a couple of states at most the rest solidfying towards a candidate is all I was saying as an example of the cutting through the hyperanalysis. I wasnt being absolutist, am just saying it will come down to a couple of states. My guess would be the above, other people think differently thats fine.

Re the golden Girl, yes there is a diffeence between scattiness and cheating absolutley with you British rules state -
1.A missed drug test is the same as a Positive drug test. ie a fail
2. missing 3 out of Comp random tests is a missed test.
3. A fail puts you out of Olympic comp forever
4. Christine is though very good, a possible gold when there arent many gold about for Brit track athletics and the potential face of 2012.
5. Christine ban overturned, rules are broken but no punishment.

The Greek sprinters didnt test positive but nobody believes them, why beleive christine, because we are british and a brits word is his/her bond and would never cheat apparently.

Notice you didnt clarify re your homophobia. Care to comment?

Jake Fischer said...

Hosertohoosier, not sure why it hasn't gotten any love in this thread, but your first post was flat-out awesome.

michael said...

couldn't wait to see today's con trolls jump on the zogby poll, showing McCain up 5...the same reviled Zogby who is barely left on Nate's model. Same day a larger Quinnipiac poll, consistent with all the other national polls, shows Obama at 47, the same as he has been for the past 2 months, and McCain at 42 - in the alice through the looking glass world that is the cons on this board, Zogby now counts more than Quinnipiac. It's fun to cherry-pick polls, and we can all play that game.

If you look at RCP's tracker, Obama has been up since mid-April, period, and his poll numbers now are about the same as they have been all along, except for a bump in mid July. If the cons want to live by Zogby, they will, I am sure,be ready to die by Zogby (the same polling firm that said Obama was going to win California by 10 over HRC. How'd that one work out?)


I do not deny that the race has tightened a little (from plus 5 nationally to plus 2-3) and that Obama needs to man up. He is getting smacked around, as someone else said, bitch-slapped, reminding me of a good-natured labrador retriever getting mauled by a pit bull with distemper. "I love America, you love America and John McCain loves America" Damn...that is WEAK!!! Wake the f88k up, Barack. McCain is trying to DESTROY you. He cannot give anyone positive reasons to vote for him, so he can only make sure they are scared of you! They have not been subtle about their playbook, and I think the attacks have moved the polls a couple of points. I don't necessarily think the MSM are in the tank for their boy, McCain, at this point, as a lot of them have been turned off by his tactics. However, they are not going to fight your fight for you. You better name a fighter like Biden, Clark or Clinton, since you just don't have the stomach for it. You need a Bob Dole-style attack dog as VP...I have no doubt it helped Ford close a 30 point gap to 2...

Still, look at the long distance lens, and Obama has led in every RCP average for 4 months, so that might be something to pay attention to.

It is his election to lose, and we really won't know much, despite all the breathless cyber-verbiage on 2 point poll swings until after the 2 veep picks and 2 conventions...basically cut to the chase, and in the past 2 months Barack has gone from up 47-44 to up...47-44.

This site was really compelling in the midst of the primaries, because we could test Nate's model and that of the pollsters regularly against real results. Basically, the polls at this point, and essentially this site are fairly meaningless, since there is NOTHING tangible to check them against. unlike Nate's vaunted baseball stats, there are NO GAMES, and the pollsters can't even agree on what is a hit or an error, a walk or an out. It is about the furthest thing from the science of baseball stats as I can imagine.

Interesting, and tea leaves and hints, but nothing past that.

You want to be a happy Con? McCain is up 46-41 according to the vaunted Zogby and Quinnipiac is a hack outfit.

You want to be a happy Lib? Obama is up 47-42 according to the vaunted Quinnipiac and Zogby is a hack outfit. It is just getting silly.

the old perfesser said...

I for one (an Obama supporter because I want change in political discourse and governance) am not concerned about choosing Biden for the Veep slot because of the governance issue:

If something awful (death/disability) takes out President Obama, then the country's situation has changed, and a different kind of leader is needed in the lurch.

Just imagine an alternative history: if in 1963 Oswald had taken out President LBJ, would you have felt confident with a young Jack Kennedy assuming the office?

徵信社robin said...

徵信社, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 外遇沖開, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信

徵信, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 徵信,徵信網, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, , 徵信公司, , , , , , , 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, , , , 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, , , , , 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信公司, , , , 徵信, 徵信社, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

信次 said...

情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,美國aneros,rudeboy,英國rudeboy,英國Rocksoff,德國Fun Factory,Fun Factory,英國甜筒造型按摩座,甜筒造型按摩座,英國Rock Chic ,瑞典 Lelo ,英國Emotional Bliss,英國 E.B,荷蘭 Natural Contours,荷蘭 N C,美國 OhMiBod,美國 OMB,Naughti Nano ,音樂按摩棒,ipod按摩棒,美國 The Screaming O,美國TSO,美國TOPCO,美國Doc Johnson,美國CA Exotic,美國CEN,美國Nasstoy,美國Tonguejoy,英國Je Joue,美國Pipe Dream,美國California Exotic,美國NassToys,美國Vibropod,美國Penthouse,仿真按摩棒,矽膠按摩棒,猛男倒模,真人倒模,仿真倒模,PJUR,Zestra,適趣液,穿戴套具,日本NPG,雙頭龍,FANCARNAL,日本NIPPORI,日本GEL,日本Aqua Style,美國WET,費洛蒙,費洛蒙香水,仿真名器,av女優,打炮,做愛,性愛,口交,吹喇叭,肛交,魔女訓練大師,無線跳蛋,有線跳蛋,震動棒,震動保險套,震動套,TOY-情趣用品,情趣用品網,情趣購物網,成人用品網,情趣用品討論,成人購物網,鎖精套,鎖精環,持久環,持久套,拉珠,逼真按摩棒,名器,超名器,逼真老二,電動自慰,自慰,打手槍,仿真女郎,SM道具,SM,性感內褲,仿真按摩棒,pornograph,hunter系列,h動畫,成人動畫,成人卡通,情色動畫,情色卡通,色情動畫,色情卡通,無修正,禁斷,人妻,極悪調教,姦淫,近親相姦,顏射,盜攝,偷拍,本土自拍,素人自拍,公園露出,街道露出,野外露出,誘姦,迷姦,輪姦,凌辱,痴漢,痴女,素人娘,中出,巨乳,調教,潮吹,av,a片,成人影片,成人影音,線上影片,成人光碟,成人無碼,成人dvd,情色影音,情色影片,情色dvd,情色光碟,航空版,薄碼,色情dvd,色情影音,色情光碟,線上A片,免費A片,A片下載,成人電影,色情電影,TOKYO HOT,SKY ANGEL,一本道,SOD,S1,ALICE JAPAN,皇冠系列,老虎系列,東京熱,亞熱,武士系列,新潮館,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套,G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,生日精品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票號碼,夜市,統一發票對獎,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解,av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情, 股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上掃毒,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,火車,房屋,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套, G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,精品,禮品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票,夜市,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解, av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av ,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情,股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上a片,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,借錢,房屋,街頭籃球,找工作,旅行社,六合彩,整型,整型,珠海,雷射溶脂,婚紗,網頁設計,水噹噹,台中隆鼻,果凍隆乳,改運整型,自體脂肪移植,新娘造型,婚禮顧問,下川島,常平,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼, 婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,白蟻,白蟻,除蟲,老鼠,減肥,減肥,在家工作,在家工作,婚友,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友,交友,交友,婚友社,婚友社,婚友社,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,越南新娘,外籍新娘,外籍新娘,台中坐月子中心,搬家公司,搬家公司,中和搬家,台北搬家,板橋搬家,新店搬家,線上客服,網頁設計,線上客服,網頁設計,植牙,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,交友,越南新娘,婚友社,外籍新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,交友,外籍新娘,視訊聊天,大陸新娘,婚友社,婚友,越南新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,視訊交友,外籍新娘,網路排名,網路排名軟體,網站排名優化大師,關鍵字排名大師,網站排名seo大師,關鍵字行銷專家,關鍵字,seo,關鍵字行銷,網頁排序,網頁排名,關鍵字大師,seo大,自然排名,網站排序,網路行銷創業,汽車借款,汽車借錢,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,拉皮,抽脂,近視雷射,隆乳,隆鼻,變性,雙眼皮,眼袋,牙齒,下巴,植牙,人工植牙,植髮,雷射美容,膠原蛋白,皮膚科,醫學美容,玻尿酸,肉毒桿菌,微晶瓷,電波拉皮,脈衝光,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車借款,汽車貸款,汽車貸款,借錢,借貸,當舖,借款,借貸,借錢,週轉,學英文,英文社團,英語俱樂部,學習英文,英語會話,英文演講,English Club,學英語,學英文,美語社團,英語社團,英文讀書會,Toastmasters,Toastmaster,英語讀書會,拍樂得批發,拍樂得飾品,拍樂得化妝品批發,

shuqian said...

SEO said...

這一家租屋網免費刊登不用錢耶,超好康的想出租房子快來吧!

專業搬家公司,服務第1,顧客至上,是你值得托負終生的好伙伴!精緻搬家公司主要是在為大家服務搬家為目的,本網站服務項目以,搬家公司、回頭車,家庭搬家,工廠搬遷,為主要,服務地區,台北搬家,台中搬家,高雄搬家公司,全省搬家公司,歡迎洽詢

順便介紹一下室內設計在國內的發展,已到了一個急待突破的瓶頸階段。雖然,在裝潢學界,我們已建立了從高中、高職、五專、二技、四技、大學到研究所相當完整的室內設計相關專業教育體系,在業界,相關從業人員至少也在數萬人以上,而民間人士對於住宅、商空、辦公室等各類空間室內設計之需求也隨著經濟的不斷成長與社會進步而日益殷切。表面上看來,室內設計似乎蓬勃發展、坦途在望,但事實並非如此。此一領域至今仍有許多問題急待克服與解決,而其中最主要的問題之一是官方一直將「室內設計」視為是依附在建築之下的附屬品,而非一獨立之專業。這種情形,我們從內政部所公布施行的建築物室內裝修管理辦法之內容便可清楚看出。



此一未與學界、業界充分溝通即匆促制訂、且施行後成效不彰的室內設計管理辦法可說問題重重,值得深入檢討,以謀徹底改善之道。



  官方對於「室內設計」未能正確定位可說是問題的主要根源之一。此一瓶頸如無法突破,則室內設計將永遠只是附屬於建築底下的一個妾身未明、專業地位未受尊敬與肯定的灰色領域。這種情形對多年來努力建立室內設計專業教育體系的學界、以及辛勤接受室內設計各級專業教育的諸多莘莘學子而言,真是情何難堪。何以同樣在中華民國教育制度下,一樣的修業年限,一樣具備完整的專業教育體系,建築、土木等領域的畢業生就有機會取得官方對其專業地位的認定,其權利能受法律保障,而修習室內設計公司的室內設計者就只能參加建築物室內裝修專業技術人員之講習與測驗,還需在建築師、建築公會或其他相關專業團體之審核查驗下夾縫求生?這對室內設計領域是不公平的。如果不是其他專業領域之專業知識與技能未能完全涵蓋、不足以有效處理室內設計相關問題,何以有室內設計存在的空間?又何需大費周章建立從高中到研究所的專業教育體系?可見室內設計有其存在的必要與價值,也有其獨具的(與其他專業有所區隔的)專業知能。
再談談網站優化SEO方案的優勢和效果保證:




網路行銷管理顧問的專業實力決定了在網站優化方案及實施方面具有獨特的優勢,主要表現在下列方面:



領先的網路行銷導向網站建設理論和系統的網站優化思想指導;

作為中國中國互聯網協會網站建設指導規範的主要起草人,對網站規範(網站優化是網站規範的基本組成部分)的認識更為深刻;

對利用國際WEB標準實施網站重構有著豐富的經驗;

從網站運營策略層面進行整體網站優化,是網站運營導向的網站優化方案而不僅僅是為了搜尋引擎排名,單純的搜尋引擎排名效果是局部的、短暫的,也可能是後患無窮的;

需要找健身中心幫你健身嗎?會變瘦唷!




SEO不等於網站優化,不提供片面的SEO方案,實踐表明只有系統的網站優化才能達到最好的、持久的搜尋引擎優化效果;

基於用戶行為的研究,通過網站SEO優化為用戶提供最有價值的信息和服務,為瀏覽者轉化為顧客奠定基礎;

為眾多不同規模的企業網站及電子商務網站提供網站優化方案、實施及運營維護,豐富的網路行銷實踐經驗,讓網站優化深入到網站運營的每個細節,這是網站優化得以成功的基本保證。
好了說完了,以下幾個站點不錯,累的話來去台北motel休息一下吧!有空能去看看
美食介紹:台中美食 

台北美食


新竹美食


桃園美食


台中美食小吃


台中美食餐廳


大台中美食網


台北美食餐廳


桃園美食餐廳
桃園美食網
優質站點介紹:手電筒,棧板,二胎,隔熱紙,照明,健身,a383,a383,兼職小姐,二手家具有人要買嗎?

bingyilg2 said...

American Wedding |USA Villa |USA Villa |USA Villa |The United States star|The United States star|American actor |American actor |USA Gymnastics |USA Gymnastics |U.S. economy |Tatsu fashion life |U.S. economy |U.S. economy|American Star |American Star |American Tourist |American Tourist |American Film |American Film |The United States soccer team |World Cup |Miss World |Miss World |Popular hairstyle|Popular hairstyle|Fashion home |Tatsu fashion life |World Cup|Wedding Fashion|Hollywood stars |Weight loss of thin |World Miss Universe |Latest movies |Weight loss of thin |

平平 said...

^^ nice blog!! ^@^

徵信, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇

徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,

徵信, 外遇, 離婚, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 征信, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,

平平 said...

^^ very nice

徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,

徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,

花蓮 said...

This will give advertisers multiple new ways to 花蓮民宿get their targeted messages to cell phone users without annoying the clients. 花蓮民宿This creates a whole new platform for advertisers that will far exceed other media. Airtime fees are continuing to decrease while giving the cellular clients more. How long until airtime is free? 花蓮This is a forward thinking, outside the box concept. 花蓮Some companies have spent millions pursuing technology in this sector but花蓮民宿 I have the answer. Can you help me with this or point me in the direction of someone who can? 花蓮美食

Happy New Year 2009! said...

室內設計,室內設計,室內設計,裝潢,室內設計,室內設計室內設計公司
,搬家公司,搬家公司,台北搬家公司,搬家公司,室內設計
這一家租屋網免費刊登不用錢耶
搬家公司,健身,茶葉A片,SEO,SEO,SEO,motel,led手電筒,棧板,二胎,隔熱紙,照明,健身,a383,a383,,二手家具,a383,胸章,車燈,
文山搬家
,兼職小姐,南港搬家,大安區搬家,松山搬家,中山區搬家,八里搬家,
五股搬家,
泰山搬家,大同區搬家,中正區搬家,士林搬家,萬華搬家,

台北搬家公司,台北搬家公司,客人,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,加油棒,台中搬家公司,台北市搬家公司,台北縣搬家公司

夏天 said...

搬家搬家搬家公司 搬家搬家Shade sailnike shoesMBA在职研究生 在职博士徵信社 徵信室內設計室內設計代償房屋貸款信用貸款外遇離婚抓姦外遇蒐證外遇抓姦侵權仿冒應收帳款工商徵信徵信 徵信社外遇徵信徵信社外遇电动隔膜泵自吸泵化工泵离心泵磁力泵螺杆泵水泵隔膜泵气动隔膜泵百家乐 轮盘 21点 德州扑克 百家乐系统 真人娱乐场 百家乐足球德州扑克 电子游戏 英格兰超级联赛 德国甲组联赛 意大利甲组联赛西班牙甲组联赛法国甲组联赛欧冠杯 英超 足球比分 足球彩票 体育彩票 即时比分 免費a片 a片 免費av 色情影片 情色 情色網 色情網站 色情 成人網成人圖片成人影片 18成人 av av女優 avav女優 情慾 走光 做愛 sex H漫 情色 情趣用品 情色 a片 a片 成人網站 成人影片 情趣用品 情趣用品アダルトアダルト アダルトサイト アダルトサイト 情趣用品搬家搬家服務搬家保障搬家網搬家估價徵信徵信的意義徵信服務徵信報導徵信問答徵信知識婚禮佈置 婚禮佈置

綜廉 said...

搬家公司,搬家,搬家公司,清潔公司,搬家,搬家公司,清潔,日本料理,清潔,清潔公司,清潔,看護中心,胎毛筆,清潔公司,會計,公司登記,公司註冊,輕鋼架,搬家公司,月子中心,搬家公司,油漆,輕鋼架天花板輕隔間,搬家公司,搬家公司,搬家,搬家公司,清潔公司,搬家,搬家公司,清潔,日本料理,清潔,清潔公司,清潔,看護中心,胎毛筆,清潔公司,會計,輕鋼架,搬家公司,月子中心,搬家公司,油漆,輕鋼架,輕隔間,天花板,搬家公司,貨運,貨運公司,網頁設計,網頁設計,網頁排名,SEO

★〃花蓮租車〃★ said...

花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花東旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,租車公司,花蓮旅行社,花蓮旅遊景點,花蓮旅遊行程,花蓮旅遊地圖,花蓮一日遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅遊網,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花東旅遊景點,租車,花蓮旅遊,花東旅遊行程,花東旅遊地圖,花蓮租車公司,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車 ,花蓮 租車,花蓮,花蓮旅遊網,花蓮租車網,花蓮,租車,花東 旅遊,花蓮 租車,花蓮,旅遊,租車公司,花蓮,花蓮旅遊,花東旅遊,花蓮地圖,包車,花蓮,旅遊租車,花蓮 租車,租車,花蓮租車資訊網,花蓮 旅遊,租車,花東,花東地圖,租車公司,租車網,花蓮租車旅遊,租車,花蓮,賞鯨,花蓮旅遊租車,花東旅遊,租車網,花蓮海洋公園,租車 ,花蓮 租車,花蓮,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車公司,租車花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅行社,花東旅遊,花蓮包車,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮一日遊,租車服務,花蓮租車公司,花蓮包車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮租車,租車網,花蓮租車公司,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,租車服務,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,租車公司,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮一日遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車網,花蓮租車,花蓮一日遊,租車花蓮,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮包車,花蓮溯溪,花蓮泛舟,花蓮溯溪旅遊網,花蓮旅遊,花蓮民宿,花蓮入口網,花蓮民宿黃頁,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,租車公司,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花東旅遊,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮旅遊,花蓮泛舟,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮溯溪,花蓮泛舟,花蓮泛舟,花蓮溯溪,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花東旅遊,花蓮,花東,花蓮旅遊,花東旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮,花東,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花東旅遊,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮,花東旅遊萬事通,花蓮旅遊,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮包車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅遊網,花蓮太魯閣,花蓮旅遊網,花蓮包車,花東旅遊,花蓮旅遊行程,花蓮旅遊,花蓮 租車,花蓮租車資訊網,花蓮租車旅遊,花蓮旅遊租車,租車,花蓮旅遊推薦,花蓮旅遊包車,花蓮租車,花蓮,花蓮租車,花蓮地圖,花蓮旅遊優惠,花蓮旅遊資訊網,花蓮旅遊景點,賞鯨,花蓮行程,花蓮旅遊,花蓮旅遊租車,花東旅遊景點,花東旅遊行程,花蓮旅遊blog,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,租車,花東旅遊

水玲珑 said...

禹承妍照片吳淑敏寫真n95型口罩 藤原紀香尹雪姬販毒溫昇豪部落格 賈靜雯部落格禹承妍自殺電玩少女瑤瑤開球 吳威廷blog時尚服飾,服裝搭配 祕魯議員萊昂 最新發型 豬哥亮廣告哈拉论坛汽车租赁

vala said...

哈拉論壇范冰冰遭索吻齊秦蕭薔滿文軍吸毒流行髮型瘦身減肥范文芳李銘順李猶龍 blog郭開源照片徐貴櫻照片馮媛甄寫真康乃狄克鬼屋影片議員張瑞山葉家妤和安定亞顏清標部落格辣妹胖妹小麻雀空姐徐煦戈偉如寫真聰明丸 ps旗山鬼屋探險琳賽蘿涵懷孕20屆金曲獎入圍名單朱麗倩照片兼職找戀花范植偉 mv無名挖挖挖女医师翁若蜜樂基兒圖片劉玉璞blog袁彌明圖片椋名凜mv天使與魔鬼影片敗犬女王主題曲星際爭霸電影丁春誠無名高以翔無名電玩美少女瑤瑤薛景求 mv周杰倫 mv羅志祥部落格韓版流星花園 ost熊貓森林遊戲

vala said...

琳賽蘿涵懷孕|馮媛甄寫真|郭開源blog|范文芳李銘順|康乃狄克鬼屋事件 plus|李猶龍mv|

貴櫻照片
|議員張瑞山|葉家妤和安定亞|顏清標部落格|空姐徐煦|

偉如的部落格
|劉玉璞部落格|星座運勢|雙子

座男人
|超級偶像張芸京陳雅倫影片危情謝順福blog蔣萬安 blog劉文正 mv謝順福blog蔣萬安 blog高以翔圖片男紀香blog守護甜心漫畫王祖賢mv迷你漢堡余筱萍的照片猴頭菇食譜東部巨型蜘蛛羅家英 only you楓之穀遊戲薛景求mv史蒂芬金黑塔郭翰陽mv無名挖挖挖王傑莫綺雯mtv大堡礁島主 clare范植偉的照片朱麗倩的近況Makiyo milkiway吴亭欣bt迷霧驚魂報稅軟體瘦大腿的方法狼愛豬影片 狼愛豬影片 山田優 real you 禹承妍照片吳淑敏寫真n95型口罩 藤原紀香尹雪姬販毒溫昇豪部落格 賈靜雯部落格禹承妍自殺電玩少女瑤瑤開球 吳威廷blog時尚服飾,服裝搭配 祕魯議員萊昂 最新發型 豬哥亮廣告哈拉论坛汽车租赁

loving said...

劉家肉粽韓國總統盧武鉉海賊王漫畫黃海寧部落格暮光之城結局無名正妹牆跑跑卡丁車官方98基測錄取pr值skype 中文版下載kmplayer繁體中文版下載PPS網絡電視下載Photoshop免費下載照片的眼睫毛製作方法98基測錄取pr值skype 中文版下載kmplayer繁體中文版下載PPS網絡電視下載Photoshop免費下載吳亭欣 blog挪亞方舟歌詞tvb 劇集show girl 張維庭王尹平真空 v薇琪性感照sweety 劉品言曾之喬陳亭妃 wiki呂韻季blog女駭客陳師迪林奇葳 wretch天使的跪座疣柄魔芋glamorous 平子理沙全慧珍圖片涂醒哲 sars關淑怡 mv吉娃娃達人林順輝吳亭欣 33c

loving said...

薇琪性感照|
show girl 張維庭|sweety 劉品言曾之喬|“鄭尚宮”呂韻季|陳亭妃 wik|全慧珍結婚|陳師迪部落格|天使的跪座|王尹平真空 v|平子理沙寫真|疣柄魔芋|關淑怡 mv|林順輝blog|涂醒哲 sars|孫樂欣 and 馮媛甄|黃海寧部落格|天母 sogo百|五股基隆冰雹

酒店上班請找艾葳 said...

艾葳酒店經紀公司提供專業的酒店經紀, 酒店上班小姐,八大行業,酒店兼職,傳播妹,或者想要到打工兼差打工,兼差,或者八大行業,酒店兼職,想去酒店上班, 日式酒店,制服酒店,ktv酒店,禮服店,整天穿得水水漂漂的,還是想去制服店上班小姐,水水們如果想要擁有打工工作、晚上兼差工作兼差打工假日兼職兼職工作酒店兼差兼差打工兼差日領工作晚上兼差工作酒店工作酒店上班酒店打工兼職兼差兼差工作酒店上班等,想了解酒店相關工作特種行業內容,想兼職工作日領假日兼職兼差打工、或晚班兼職想擁有快速賺錢又有保障的工作嗎???又可以現領請找專業又有保障的艾葳酒店經紀公司!

艾葳酒店經紀是合法的公司工作環境高雅時尚,無業績壓力,無脫秀無喝酒壓力,高層次會員制客源,工作輕鬆,可日領現領
一般的酒店經紀只會在水水們第一次上班和領薪水時出現而已,對水水們的上班安全一點保障都沒有!艾葳酒店經紀公司的水水們上班時全程媽咪作陪,不需擔心!只提供最優質的酒店上班,酒店上班,酒店打工環境、上班條件給水水們。心動嗎!? 趕快來填寫你的酒店上班履歷表

水水們妳有缺現領、有兼職缺錢卡奴的煩腦嗎?想到日本留學缺錢嗎?妳是傳播妹??想要擁有高時薪又輕鬆的夜間兼職工作,打工機會和,假日打工,假日兼職賺錢的機會嗎??想實現夢想卻又缺錢沒錢嗎!??
艾葳酒店台北酒店經紀招兵買馬!!徵專業的酒店打工,想要去酒店的水水,想要短期日領,酒店日領,禮服酒店,制服店,酒店經紀,ktv酒店,便服店,酒店工作,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店經紀人,
等相關服務 幫您快速的實現您的夢想~!!

freefun0616 said...

酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,

,