Saturday, August 16, 2008

538's Battlegrounds as of Mid-August

Our final deep breath before the VP picks and the conventions is a good time to do the monthly update of battleground states according to our projection model. Mid-September's will come between the conventions and the debates, and mid-October's will come after we know the polling effects from the debate series.

The last month has seen a nearly across-the-board uptick for John McCain. That's his good news. The good news for Barack Obama is that no states have flipped in our projections since mid-July. Since that month showed more of the McCain states inside of five points closer to the dead-even line, it's now Obama whose states are slightly closer to that line. Two Obama-projected states sit on the precipice of flipping: Ohio and Colorado.

The mid-August projection -- using a winner-take-all model rather than the probabilistic version that we usually use here -- remains at Obama 293, McCain 245.

FiveThirtyEight's mid-August Battlegrounds, 136 EVs:



Since McCain's movement was small but consistent, we've added a column for this month called the "McGain." Movement toward McCain is represented by a positive number. The line demarcates McCain-projected states from Obama-projected ones. Although no state has flipped across the line this month, New Hampshire and Iowa found their way inside of five points and Indiana is now projected outside of five points for McCain despite a polling average under two points.

McCain Penumbra States (projected between 5%-10%)
, 40 EVs:



From July, South Carolina, Arizona and Texas have moved into double digit McCain projections, while Indiana joined this group's ranks.

Obama's Penumbra States
(projected between 5%-10%), 66 EVs:



In the last month, Minnesota has made a strong move from double-digit land into this group, going from Obama +11.6 to Obama +6.4. Iowa and New Hampshire graduated to battleground status and the remaining states stayed put. While Minnesota's strong movement isn't good news for Obama, the truth is +6.4 and a far better ground game is still fairly comfortable.

In double-digit base EV projections, Obama leads 165-131. Including Penumbra States, Obama leads 231-171.

Significant Movement:

Obama made incremental gains in our projections for the battlegrounds of Nevada (0.6), Florida (0.4) and Pennsylvania (0.3), but mostly found his numbers slipping elsewhere. The biggest explanation can be found in the Super Tracker. Notice that in mid-July Obama's lead was roughly three points; today it is roughly one point. That two-point slippage tracks with the projection movement this month.




The next time we update our battleground projections roughly 11 days after the final gavel in St. Paul, remember that "par" is a lingering McCain post-convention bounce of just over two points on average; for an explanation why, see yesterday's post on what a convention bounce looks like. That means that if McCain is polling two points higher across the board than he is today, our projection will hold him steady.

This battleground report does not include today's polls, so this is our forecast as of Saturday morning. Colorado and New Mexico have ticked slightly closer; New Hampshire has slightly widened. North Carolina has edged just into the Penumbra category if we were including today's results, and Missouri is now almost there.

The significant story around field organizing will still have its say, mostly separate from the polling model. Remember that a strong field program working against a poor one (without doubt that is the case right now) puts McCain still in the position of either actually getting a field program working at better than 3% of Obama's output or risking these close states tipping in Obama's direction under the polling radar.

20 comments

JSN said...

As long as you come up with an equally catchy name for the reverse, Obamabounce?
McCrumble?

Personally, I didn't know McCain admitted to having cheated on his wife until recently. I swear one party considers that a seriously critical issue.

filistro said...

Antonym of "McGain"... "Omentum!"

filistro said...
This post has been removed by the author.
filistro said...

Though I do like "McCrumble," too. Or how about "McCave"?

BTW, can anybody tell me how to remove an accidental double post? Others seem able to remove posts, but I can't figure out how they do it.

Smitty said...
This post has been removed by the author.
John Nail said...

Sean, the latest CO poll shows the "base" gap manifesting itself in the 45+ Dems.

Is there a way to quantify the base gap by state and in total here to track it post Denver?

Pew had at least a 5% gap in their latest poll and others have had it 6-9.

If the nomination of Hillary and hoopla doesn't close the gap post Denver that seems to me like the killer issue.

Cugel said...

The key in GOTV as Bush proved in 2004 is how good the micro-targeting lists are. This requires a LOT of local outreach.

Basically in Colorado the Obama campaign strategy is to develop a micro-targeted list of every Democratic voter in the state and all the Independents who express an interest in voting for Obama.

They are following up at intervals to make sure the voters have information, that Obama volunteers are grabbed wherever possible and that every identified Obama supporter gets all information about early voting, etc. (Colorado allows you to sign up to receive a mail-in ballot sometime in the middle of October).

So, an efficient ground game here can start banking votes 3 weeks before the election. That's clearly the strategy going in -- to keep refining the lists and make sure that they have adequate follow up to get every potential supporter to the polls, or get them registered and make sure they get absentee ballots, etc.

From my personal experience here they are pretty good at this so far. But, I don't know exactly what sorts of out-reach the McCain camp is doing from their 1 field office.

They have plenty of ads on the air, but turning our your supporters on election day will be key. Obama will have a massive turnout effort here. We'll see how McCain does.

filistro said...

Thanks Smitty, I appreciate the help.

ogre said...

AK shows a net +0.4 despite the Hays polling that came out a couple days ago showing AK at O45/M40?

Did I miss something significant?

PorridgeGun said...

Colorado to McCain: Hands Off Our Water

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/16/16825/8416/570/568960


Could this be a potential deal-breaker, like DHL in Ohio?

winged sevens said...

a little childish all this name-calling. and after such a fine and erudite post by mr nines. pshaw.

winged sevens said...

McFilistro. I'm (not) loving it.

Simon said...

Ogre,

The Hays poll is not included in the projections because it was payed for by a pro-Obama union, and so is possibly and probably biased. I still think that Obama is closer in AK than other polls give him credit, just a feeling, but we need an unbiased poll in AK for that. And for God's sake can we please have a poll in Indiana!

filistro said...

Sorry to have offended you, wingfoot. But if Sean doesn't want us to play with words, he's got to stop tempting us by coining delcious tidbits like "McGain" to indicate GOP improvements in the polls.

eponymous said...

porridge,

No issue is a deal-breaker in any state, especially any issue just breaking in mid-August.

Besides, American elections simply aren't decided on the issues. There is a strong tradition, dating back to Jackson at least, of personality-based voting that is not going to be reversed any time soon. What that translates to today is a competition between the candidates to see who can lie the most effectively about the other's character.

For the most recent cycle, the decision goes to McCain. We'll see how things progress...

TJB said...

You are giving a DEMOCRAT sponsored poll (PPP) 1 and a half times as much strength as a more recent Rasmussen poll in Ohio.

You also are giving PPP more weight than a CBS/Rocky Mt News Poll in Colorado.

I can understand you are admittedly pro-Obama but in this case, your bias is skewing the electoral vote projection.

Simon said...

TJB,

The PPP poll in Ohio had more than twice the sample-space as the Rasmussen poll, and they're only 2 days apart, so that accounts for the difference in weighting.

And if you look at the Pollster ratings, PPP is rated at +1.86, CBS at +2.64. So there's that.