One of the important functions that a party apparatus performs is to build its bench, shining a brighter light on candidates who might rise to prominence in future election cycles. Would Barack Obama have become the (presumptive) Democratic nominee if not for John Kerry giving him the keynote address at the 2004 convention? Very likely not.
As such, John McCain is smart to meet with Bobby Jindal at his ranch in Sedona this weekend, boosting Jindal's name recognition and placing him on the same pedestal as better-known candidates like Mitt Romney and Charlie Crist. However, it is hard for me to believe that Jindal is under serious considerataion to be McCain's running mate.
Part of the reason why, of course, is that Jindal would seem to take the ticket-balancing idea just a little too far, at least along the dimension of age. At 36, Jindal is literally half of McCain's age, and he has been governor of Louisiana for all of four months. Precisely because of McCain's age, there is likely to be a greater emphasis placed on the readiness of his running mate, and putting Jindal on the ticket would severerly constrain McCain's ability to draw contrasts of experience against Barack Obama.
But the larger reason is that the GOP has bigger things to worry about than pleasing its conservative base. The Republicans enter this election with something like a 10-point disadvantage in party identification. Turning out their base will not be a sufficient strategy for them to win the election. Instead, McCain will need to win the clear majority of independents, or a goodly number of Democrats.
Jindal, however, has a strongly right-wing position on abortion, stating that he is against abortion 100 percent of the time without exception. (Jindal has since sought to clarify his position in the instance where the life of the mother is threatened; this is the subject of an edit war right now on Wikipedia). According to data compiled by PollingReport.com, only 15-20 percent of Americans believe that abortion should be illegal in all cases, such as in cases of rape or incest. Jindal's position would appear to be in that 15-20 percent, and is likely to scare the hell out of independent and moderate women in the suburbs. Without the "security mom" vote, McCain can't win this election.
That is not to categorically rule out the idea of McCain nominating a strongly pro-life conservative. Someone like Mike Huckabee, for instance, has formidable political gifts and is certainly worth his consideration. But given the mood of the electorate, that is more in spite of his position on abortion than because of it.
5.25.2008
McCain-Jindal?
by Nate Silver @ 3:00 PM...see also mccain, party identification, values, vice president
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

34 comments
I disagree, partially, with this part of your post, Poblano:
Precisely because of McCain's age, there is likely to be a greater emphasis placed on the readiness of his running mate.
I think this is one question the TM will be very wary of bringing up; they don't want to insinuate that McCain, or any President, would die in office.
If the question is brought up, I think it will be brought up obliquely and through back channels; almost a whisper campaign, if you will.
No, nobody in the MSM or the campaigns would OPENLY bring up the possibility of McCain dying in office, (just like nobody in their right minds SHOULD bring up talk of assassinations hint, hint, Clinton...) However, even McCain himself has said something to the effect of his age making his VP pick more important. these things may be taboo to bring up openly, but people think about them, and they know how to talk around them.
Honnestly, I think Jindal would be a bad pick for McCain for much simpler, if uglier, reasons: He loses the enthiphob vote (or at least hight turnout thereof), and a large chunk of the "experience" vote.
Jindal (and Crist) are good Governors, but it’s a no-brainer that Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is the best pick for McCain.
An interesting scenario:
Jindal gets picked as VP.
Obama wins.
Jindal gets nominated in 2012.
We have a plausible scenario for an all-non-white presidential election.
As a white guy, I say: 43 in a row was plenty, thanks.
Jindal (potential VP for McCain) converted to Christian religion from Hindu religion and is an opportunist right from the begining on the policies.
Jindal is exactly similar to Clinton who will 'say anything and do anything to win election'.
Shame on Jindal / Clinton.
Jindal would be an intriguing choice, but I agree with your reasoning.
But isn't McCain jumping the gun a little here? Or are these meetings being staged to show bring various constituencies back on board?
McCain would be smart to hold off on making a choice and hope that Obama decids first. If Obama picked a man, McCain would have the chance of selecting a moderate woman and then be in a position to win many of Senator Clinton's supporters.
The oldest first time Presidential nominee picks the youngest Vice Presidential nominee...like that will happen. Particularly when the guys appeal to Independents, women specifically, is very suspect.
Ain't gonna happen.'
No way. Jindal is brown.
There's no good choice for McCain. He has to pick someone who can bring one of the big groups back on board, and all such candidates will drive off voters from the other two groups. Religious conservatives and Romney or Paul? Corporate clowns and Huckabee or Paul? Right-wing pot smokers and anyone but Paul?
I agree with Sensible Person - Jindal would be an awful pick for McCain because he would suppress the racist vote that he'll need to stay even close to Obama. And at age 36 - he'd be wayyy too young for the "experience" voters.
I definitely agree with 538's opinion that this is just to get Jindal's name out there for future races.
Yeah because anyone that doesn't vote for the messiah must be a racist. Obama supporters that cry racism at every step are only hurting their cause.
Will Moore, Jindal does have to be nominated as VP to run in 2012 (or 2016). It's silly to run for VP when he's just started his term as governor anyway.
Sensible Person, "enthiphob"? Is that supposed to be "ethniphobe"? Even that is virtually unknown. Why not just say "racist"?
Brandon, who suggested such a thing? The point is that some people not voting for Obama are racists. Do you actually disagree?
He's not picking a conservative as his VP. This is all for show so he can claim that he looked at some conservatives before deciding on a moderate. He needs to go for the fences with his choice since he has almost no shot of winning the Presidency. It will be Bloomberg.
Isn't it obvious?
Obama clearly equals change in a Change election cycle. To compete, McCain needs to roll out something big, something new, while not alienating his conservative base.
Meanwhile, Lieberman political future is in doubt, having lost his base in Connecticut. Has anyone else noticed how often Lieberman has been spouting Republican positions and defending McCain lately? Or how much time they are spending together? Lieberman has clearly hitched wagons with McCain, gambling on some quid pro quo I imagine.
By adding a marginally Democratic Senator to his ticket, "maverick" McCain could reignite the adoration of media pundants and capture the attention of undecided independants...
-jon
Jon-
I used to think it would be Lieberman, but the SurveyUSA VP polls have shown that Lieberman actually brings McCain down. I think he's hoping for Secretary of Defense since he's finished in Connecticut. But I was thinking along similar lines and came up with Bloomberg.
No way it will be Bloomberg. Bloomberg is pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro gun control.
If you want about 30% of the Republican party to sit out the election, Bloomberg is a good choice. There would literally be an uprising at the convention.
Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is the darkhorse to be keeping an eye on.
44, female, anti-choice(pro-life), husband a commercial fisherman, oldest son serving in the Army, 80%+ approval rating, helps McCain's fight in the Pacific Northwest - and more ... I've laid out some quick reasons: http://thedeadguy.com/2008/palin-vp
There are a ton of right-wing blogs talking about her for Vice - but almost no one on the left-wing blogs.
"he's brown"
Are we serious? Jindal isn't a bad choice because he's Indian-American. What possible ethnic stereotypes does he have to fight?
He's a terrible choice because of his extremism.
And it doesn't help that even as a fellow Indian-American, I would never vote for the guy.
If Jindal is the Republican bench they need to shine a light on, if he is their candidate of the future, then they are truly doomed to a generation as the minority party.
McBush has a challenge. Jindal's a bad choice for all the reasons Poblano's post made clear. Crist is a problem because of, well, does Larry Craig ring a bell?
He can't pick Huckleberry because he'll lose Michigan and Wisconsin, and he can't pick Romney because he'll lose the Carolinas, Georgia, Missouri, Florida, and maybe even Mississippi and Texas over the Mormon issue.
How about Jeb Bush?
Per the recent SurveyUSA veep polls: the data is remarkably consistent, and not what seems to be expected:
1) The polls show that Obama's pick for running mate is much more important than McCain's pick.
2) If Obama picks Edwards for running mate, he will win. A 10 point swing is insurmountable for Republicans this year.
3) McCain's best polling is for: Mike Huckabee (surprisingly). What's more, Huckabee improves his numbers the most in California, Pennsylvania, and New Mexico, but not much in Virginia. My hypothesis for the reason that people outside the Bible belt (i.e., the votes McCain needs anyway) are most likely to be more pro-Huckabee has to do with the perception of the Republican party: in the South, the Republican party is primarily perceived as the party of social conservativism, while elsewhere, economic and military concerns may dominate. Elsewhere, Huckabee's socially right policies will prove popular (don't think that the value voters, who are much more likely to base their vote on social issues than their left counterparts, have disappeared).
4) The people want a name they know in politics, and that name can't be Mitt Romney.
The chances of McCain looking at this poll and picking Huckabee? About 0%. The chances of picking Romney? About 50%. He's been running an awful campaign so far (e.g., spending 1 month campaigning in the South and states like Kentucky; going to Michigan and talking about non-economic issues, trying to veer further to the [i]right[/i] even after securing the Republican nomination, etc.); he has the worst campaign staff in my memory. Someone please call Karl Rove!
The chances of Obama picking up Edwards? Darned good - his staff actually has brains and has worked well. I give it near 50%.
KCinDC, don't you think there are also black Obama voters that are voting for him ONLY because he is black? You can cry racism so can I.
My take in Jindal: I agree 1000% that this is over-balancing the ticket, and it would hurt him (it wouldn't help turn out the racist vote either). However, his pro-life policies will have little effect: let's not forget how Barack Obama voted to make it legal to allow a unwanted, but born alive fetus to die (a position surely held by les than 15% of the electorate) - this hasn't hurt him (yet) though.
Brandon: I'm not claiming that everyone who doesn't vote for obama is racist. However, the fact that he is black has something to do with why a lot of people aren't. And as for your "black racism" charge: are you seriously suggesting that a substantial portion of the black voters voting for Obama wouldn't vote for a white candidate, just because they were white? Because a good 6% of Americans WAS willing to admit that they wouldn't vote for a black man in the latest Gallup poll on the issue.
As for my use of the term "ethniphobe..." I intentionally used that term because I think a lot of it's slightly more complex than pure racism (although there probably is some of that involved.) Basically, it's that people are afraid of anything "other" in a cultural sense. It's partially his race, but then it's partially his name, partially the muslim smear, partially the Rev Wright thing... each one feeds of the other, and it creates this image in many people's mind of someone "other" a threat to "mainstream" (and yes, white) America. So it's not much BETTER than pure racism, but it is more complex.
Jindal doesn't have a muslim smear or an insane former pastor yet, but he does have a name that a lot of these "ethnophobic" people would find scary. I don't think he'd necessarily even get some of the same hysterical myths propagated about himself, but it would slow the momentum of the anti-Obama ethnophobia.
Yes, that is what I am saying. You had black people voting for Obama over Clinton just because he was black. If a white candidate got 95% of the white vote against a black candidate, everyone would be crying racism. Why isn't the reverse true when a black candidate gets 95% of the black vote against a white candidate?
Brandon, my point here is, Most of Obama's black supporters didn't refuse to vote for Kerry in '04 because he was white. Racism (and all forms of bigotry, for that matter) is a negative concept i.e. you vote AGAINST someone because of their race, not for them because of it. If both candidates were black, the racists would stay home or vote third party, whereas when they have both been white, that mostly hasn't been the case the other way around. I don't want to make a big deal out of the racism thing, because I don't think it's a big deal, but I'm not gonna be naive by pretending it doesn't exist.
I think everyone is missing the point. MacCain lost the Louisiana primary by 1% to Huckabee. Maybe he wants to get to know a suscessful Louisiana Republican.
Brandon:
African-Americans tend to vote near 90-10 for the Democratic candidate every single election. That's why they are considered the most loyal voting bloc in the Democratic party.
Now.. just because they vote in those strong numbers for the first viable African-American candidate does not make those voters racist. Historically, white democratic Presidential candidates get strong black support.
I feel, on the other hand, that any John Smith black candidate would do just as poorly as Obama in Appalachia.
Obama is clearly the biggest pro-death candidate in this field, so I think McCain picks someone to help him with the "base." Jindal is a good choice, but will alienate some.
I like Pawlenty, or Palin.
徵信社, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 外遇沖開, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信
徵信, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵信,徵信網, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵, 徵信公司, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵, 徵
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,美國aneros,rudeboy,英國rudeboy,英國Rocksoff,德國Fun Factory,Fun Factory,英國甜筒造型按摩座,甜筒造型按摩座,英國Rock Chic ,瑞典 Lelo ,英國Emotional Bliss,英國 E.B,荷蘭 Natural Contours,荷蘭 N C,美國 OhMiBod,美國 OMB,Naughti Nano ,音樂按摩棒,ipod按摩棒,美國 The Screaming O,美國TSO,美國TOPCO,美國Doc Johnson,美國CA Exotic,美國CEN,美國Nasstoy,美國Tonguejoy,英國Je Joue,美國Pipe Dream,美國California Exotic,美國NassToys,美國Vibropod,美國Penthouse,仿真按摩棒,矽膠按摩棒,猛男倒模,真人倒模,仿真倒模,PJUR,Zestra,適趣液,穿戴套具,日本NPG,雙頭龍,FANCARNAL,日本NIPPORI,日本GEL,日本Aqua Style,美國WET,費洛蒙,費洛蒙香水,仿真名器,av女優,打炮,做愛,性愛,口交,吹喇叭,肛交,魔女訓練大師,無線跳蛋,有線跳蛋,震動棒,震動保險套,震動套,TOY-情趣用品,情趣用品網,情趣購物網,成人用品網,情趣用品討論,成人購物網,鎖精套,鎖精環,持久環,持久套,拉珠,逼真按摩棒,名器,超名器,逼真老二,電動自慰,自慰,打手槍,仿真女郎,SM道具,SM,性感內褲,仿真按摩棒,pornograph,hunter系列,h動畫,成人動畫,成人卡通,情色動畫,情色卡通,色情動畫,色情卡通,無修正,禁斷,人妻,極悪調教,姦淫,近親相姦,顏射,盜攝,偷拍,本土自拍,素人自拍,公園露出,街道露出,野外露出,誘姦,迷姦,輪姦,凌辱,痴漢,痴女,素人娘,中出,巨乳,調教,潮吹,av,a片,成人影片,成人影音,線上影片,成人光碟,成人無碼,成人dvd,情色影音,情色影片,情色dvd,情色光碟,航空版,薄碼,色情dvd,色情影音,色情光碟,線上A片,免費A片,A片下載,成人電影,色情電影,TOKYO HOT,SKY ANGEL,一本道,SOD,S1,ALICE JAPAN,皇冠系列,老虎系列,東京熱,亞熱,武士系列,新潮館,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套,G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,生日精品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票號碼,夜市,統一發票對獎,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解,av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情, 股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上掃毒,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,火車,房屋,情趣用品,情趣,情趣商品,情趣網站,跳蛋,按摩棒,充氣娃娃,自慰套, G點,性感內衣,情趣內衣,角色扮演,生日禮物,精品,禮品,自慰,打手槍,潮吹,高潮,後庭,情色論譠,影片下載,遊戲下載,手機鈴聲,音樂下載,開獎號碼,統一發票,夜市,保險套,做愛,減肥,美容,瘦身,當舖,軟體下載,汽車,機車,手機,來電答鈴,週年慶,美食,徵信社,網頁設計,網站設計,室內設計,靈異照片,同志,聊天室,運動彩券,,大樂透,威力彩,搬家公司,除蟲,偷拍,自拍,無名破解, av女優,小說,民宿,大樂透開獎號碼,大樂透中獎號碼,威力彩開獎號碼,討論區,痴漢,懷孕,美女交友,交友,日本av ,日本,機票,香水,股市,股市行情,股市分析,租房子,成人影片,免費影片,醫學美容,免費算命,算命,姓名配對,姓名學,姓名學免費,遊戲,好玩遊戲,好玩遊戲區,線上遊戲,新遊戲,漫畫,線上漫畫,動畫,成人圖片,桌布,桌布下載,電視節目表,線上電視,線上a片,線上a片,線上翻譯,購物車,身分證製造機,身分證產生器,手機,二手車,中古車,法拍屋,歌詞,音樂,音樂網,借錢,房屋,街頭籃球,找工作,旅行社,六合彩,整型,水噹噹,貸款,貸款,信用貸款,宜蘭民宿,花蓮民宿,未婚聯誼,網路購物,珠海,下川島,常平,珠海,澳門機票,香港機票,婚友,婚友社,未婚聯誼,交友,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友社,婚友,婚友社,單身聯誼,婚友,未婚聯誼,婚友社,未婚聯誼,單身聯誼,單身聯誼,婚友,單身聯誼,未婚聯誼,婚友,交友,交友,婚友社,婚友社,婚友社,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,大陸新娘,越南新娘,越南新娘,外籍新娘,外籍新娘,台中坐月子中心,搬家公司,搬家,搬家,搬家公司,線上客服,網頁設計,線上客服,網頁設計,網頁設計,土地貸款,免費資源,電腦教學,wordpress,人工植牙,關鍵字,關鍵字,seo,seo,網路排名,自然排序,網路排名軟體,
^^ nice blog!! thanks a lot! ^^
徵信, 徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,
徵信, 外遇, 離婚, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信社, 征信, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 征信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,
^^ nice blog!! ^@^
徵信, 徵信, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 感情挽回, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 挽回感情, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信, 捉姦, 徵信公司, 通姦, 通姦罪, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 捉姦, 監聽, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 外遇問題, 徵信, 捉姦, 女人徵信, 女子徵信, 外遇問題, 女子徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 徵信公司, 徵信網, 外遇蒐證, 抓姦, 抓猴, 捉猴, 調查跟蹤, 反跟蹤, 感情挽回, 挽回感情, 婚姻挽回, 挽回婚姻, 外遇沖開, 抓姦, 女子徵信, 外遇蒐證, 外遇, 通姦, 通姦罪, 贍養費, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信公司, 女人徵信, 外遇
徵信, 徵信網, 徵信社, 徵信網, 外遇, 徵信, 徵信社, 抓姦, 徵信, 女人徵信, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 徵信公司, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 女人徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 女子徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社,
艾葳酒店經紀公司提供專業的酒店經紀, 酒店上班小姐,八大行業,酒店兼職,傳播妹,或者想要到打工兼差、打工,兼差,或者八大行業,酒店兼職,想去酒店上班, 日式酒店,制服酒店,ktv酒店,禮服店,整天穿得水水漂漂的,還是想去制服店當上班小姐,水水們如果想要擁有打工工作、晚上兼差工作、兼差打工、假日兼職、兼職工作、酒店兼差、兼差、打工兼差、日領工作、晚上兼差工作、酒店工作、酒店上班、酒店打工、兼職、兼差、兼差工作、酒店上班等,想了解酒店相關工作和特種行業內容,想兼職工作日領、假日兼職、兼差打工、或晚班兼職想擁有快速賺錢又有保障的工作嗎???又可以現領請找專業又有保障的艾葳酒店經紀公司!
艾葳酒店經紀是合法的公司工作環境高雅時尚,無業績壓力,無脫秀無喝酒壓力,高層次會員制客源,工作輕鬆,可日領、現領。
一般的酒店經紀只會在水水們第一次上班和領薪水時出現而已,對水水們的上班安全一點保障都沒有!艾葳酒店經紀公司的水水們上班時全程媽咪作陪,不需擔心!只提供最優質的酒店上班,酒店上班,酒店打工環境、上班條件給水水們。心動嗎!? 趕快來填寫你的酒店上班履歷表
水水們妳有缺現領、有兼職、缺錢卡奴的煩腦嗎?想到日本留學缺錢嗎?妳是傳播妹??想要擁有高時薪又輕鬆的夜間兼職工作,打工機會和,假日打工,假日兼職賺錢的機會嗎??想實現夢想卻又缺錢沒錢嗎!??
艾葳酒店台北酒店經紀招兵買馬!!徵專業的酒店打工,想要去酒店的水水,想要短期日領,酒店日領,禮服酒店,制服店,酒店經紀,ktv酒店,便服店,酒店工作,禮服店,酒店小姐,酒店經紀人,
等相關服務 幫您快速的實現您的夢想~!!
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
菲
梵,
Post a Comment