Just fill in the values in yellow.
Friday, May 2, 2008
Make your own North Carolina prediction
-- Poblano at 10:25 AM
Labels: north carolina
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Pollsters and Poll Compilations
Other Resources
Labels
- 12th amendment (1)
- 2004 (1)
- 2012 (1)
- 50-state strategy (2)
- advertising (7)
- african-americans (6)
- alabama (10)
- alaska (5)
- approval ratings (1)
- arg (8)
- arizona (7)
- arkansas (5)
- ballot initiatives (2)
- barr (5)
- battleground states (4)
- best-of (6)
- bounces (10)
- bradley effect (3)
- bush (2)
- california (14)
- cartography (5)
- clinton (36)
- coattails (2)
- colorado (8)
- connecticut (6)
- controversy (23)
- conventions (2)
- debates (3)
- deep south (4)
- defectors (10)
- demographics (18)
- depth of support (5)
- dirty tricks (1)
- education (2)
- edwards (3)
- electoral math (12)
- endgame (4)
- endorsements (3)
- energy (2)
- enthusiasm (2)
- evangelicals (7)
- exit polls (7)
- flip-flops (4)
- florida (24)
- foreign policy (1)
- frontrunner effect (1)
- fundraising (6)
- futures markets (5)
- georgia (13)
- governor (1)
- guardian (1)
- history (9)
- house (2)
- huckabee (1)
- ideology (3)
- illinois (3)
- independents (4)
- indiana (15)
- internal polls (1)
- intrade (6)
- iowa (11)
- iraq (1)
- kansas (8)
- kentucky (13)
- late deciders (1)
- latinos (4)
- libertarians (4)
- lieberman (1)
- likely voters (4)
- limbaugh effect (2)
- liveblog (6)
- louisiana (5)
- magic number (1)
- maine (5)
- massachusetts (10)
- mccain (24)
- meta (35)
- methodology (37)
- michigan (26)
- minnesota (14)
- mississippi (4)
- missouri (10)
- momentum (1)
- montana (11)
- msm (26)
- nader (4)
- national polls (12)
- national security (1)
- nebraska (4)
- nevada (7)
- new hampshire (7)
- new jersey (9)
- new mexico (8)
- new york (17)
- north carolina (31)
- north dakota (4)
- obama (44)
- obamacans (1)
- ohio (19)
- oklahoma (2)
- oregon (19)
- organizing (3)
- partisan (1)
- party identification (10)
- pennsylvania (36)
- pew (3)
- pledged delegates (4)
- political spectrum (3)
- pollster ratings (5)
- pollsters (7)
- pop quiz (2)
- popular vote (11)
- portfolio theory (1)
- prairie states (1)
- primaries (78)
- puerto rico (6)
- q+a (2)
- quinnipiac (1)
- race (5)
- rasmussen (4)
- red states (1)
- religion (1)
- rhode island (2)
- right-track (1)
- robopolls (2)
- roundup (2)
- scenario testing (7)
- senate (13)
- senate polls (2)
- site (57)
- south carolina (5)
- south coast (2)
- south dakota (11)
- southern baptists (5)
- spin (9)
- superdelegates (19)
- survey usa (9)
- swing states (6)
- swing voters (2)
- targeting (1)
- tennessee (3)
- texas (6)
- third parties (5)
- timing bias (2)
- today's polls (107)
- tracking polls (2)
- turnout models (14)
- utah (4)
- values (3)
- vice president (15)
- vice-president (1)
- virginia (12)
- voter suppression (1)
- washington (16)
- west virginia (10)
- wisconsin (14)
- wyoming (1)
- youth vote (4)
- zogby (2)
Blog Archive
Wonks
- Al Giordano
- Andrew Malcolm
- Andrew Romano
- Andrew Sullivan
- Anne Kornblut
- Arianna Huffington
- Ben Smith
- Camille Paglia
- Carl Bernstein
- Charles Franklin
- Charlie Cook
- Chris Bowers
- Chris Cillizza
- Christopher Hayes
- Christopher Hitchens
- Chuck Todd
- Crowley & Schieber
- Dan Balz
- Dana Milbank
- Dave Weigel
- David Brock
- David Broder
- David Brooks
- David Corn
- David Kuo
- David Sirota
- David Yepsen
- Dayn Perry
- Ed Morrissey
- Eugene Robinson
- Ezra Klein
- Frank Rich
- Jay Cost
- Jed Report
- Jeremy Schahill
- Jill Tubman
- Jim Geraghty
- Jon Cohen
- Jon Dickerson
- Jon Ralston
- Jonathan Alter
- Jonathan Chait
- Jonathan Martin
- Josh Marshall
- Julie Mason
- Katrina Vanden Heuvel
- Keith Olbermann
- Kevin Phillips
- Kid Oakland
- Larry Sabato
- Margaret Carlson
- Mark Ambinder
- Mark Blumenthal
- Mark Halperin
- Markos Moulitsas
- Matt Bai
- Matt Stoller
- Matt Taibbi
- Matt Yglesias
- Maureen Dowd
- Michael Barone
- Mike Lux
- P.J. O'Rourke
- Patrick Ottenhoff
- Peggy Noonan
- Robert Reich
- Ron Brownstein
- Ron Fournier
- Ross Douthat
- Ryan Lizza
- Schaller & Schmidt
- Sean Reagan
- Steve Kornacki
- Steve Levitt
- Stuart Rothenberg
- The Guardian
- Todd Beeton
- Tom Jensen
- Zubin Jelveh
19 comments
Cool. Love this tool, and I'm definitely gonna be using zohosheets in the future.
Cool.
I'm getting Clinton +0.2, which may be a bit of a stretch.
Edwards is not on the ballot.
Just replace "John Edwards" with "Uncommitted/Gravel" (which are both on the ballot).
Incidentally, I'm getting Obama +15.7% (I project that African American turnout will be about 38%, which is about 75% of the portion of Kerry's vote which was African American in North Carolina).
Despite his turbulent weeks, it will be double digits for Obama - by God's special grace.
In a moment of honesty, John McCain agrees that the war in Iraq was for oil. There's no way he's going to spin this - unless he thinks the American people are fools.
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/MCCAIN_IRAQ_WAR_WAS_FOR_OIL
Well, this tool is the best demonstration possible that Obama ain't gonna lose NC. My conservative hypotheses are 33% Black turnout, Clinton winning non-Blacks 2 to 1 and Obama winning Blacks 9 to 1. Obama still wins by 4.
The early voting so far has close to 39% African-Americans voting. It won't necessarily be that high in total, but it would appear to be a sign that either African-Americans are more engaged in the election on average or Obama's get out the vote operation is a little better than Clinton's. I figure 35% African-Americans breaking 91-9 for Obama and Clinton winning whites 63-37 for an 11.8% Obama win.
meh
It is a delegate race first and foremost. Can you have it pump out the delegate numbers for me?
Sweet. I'm getting +13 Obama here, hopefully it'll be even higher.
@ bedir:
CNN has a delegate calculator on their site (I don't have an exact link). You can calculate %s here and plug them in over there for all the states that are left.
CNN's delegate calculator acts as if all delegates are at-large.
So it isn't really a useful tool.
True enough. But it's something. It gives a rough idea. And with randomly declaring superdelegates thrown in the mix, any model a week or so out is only going to be so accurate.
Technically it´s nothing special, but that tool is nice.
I just wanted to report a new NY poll:
RasmussenReports, Obama +17, Clinton +29, taken 4/299, n=500
I am really hoping you will turn your demographics model on NC with a district by district prediction like you did for Penn.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/1/145210/9316/925/503525
This should be accurate as well.
Love the tool! My prediction is:
White vote:
Clinton:
67%
Obama:
32%
Black turnout = 35%
Black vote:
Clinton:
10%
Obama:
90%
End result:
Clinton - 47.1%
Obama - 52.3%
= Obama +5.2%
I actually think the black vote might be 91% for Obama. I think it'll be 89% for black women, and 93% for black men. I think black women make up a much larger percentage of the black turnout, though.
actually you can use the CNN or Forbes delegate counter just pretend the percentages means percentage of delegates instead of popular vote. Thats what i did and got some numbers pretty close to the actual results
Whites: Clinton 70 percent
Blacks: Clinton 15 percent
Turnout for Blacks: 35 percent
Pay attention to how many Hispanics turn out. NC has a larger Hispanic population than most people realize.
People forget that there a lot of people in NC who are registered Democrats who haven't voted Democrat in 30 years but will turn out to vote against Obama because he is black. They wouldn't dare vote for Clinton in the Fall but they will do everything they can to make sure a Black person does not get the nomination. Sad but true
Post a Comment